Cargando…

Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey

Background:  Knowing the needs of the bioimaging community with respect to research data management (RDM) is essential for identifying measures that enable adoption of the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles for microscopy and bioimage analysis data across disciplines. As...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Christian, Hanne, Janina, Moore, Josh, Meesters, Christian, Ferrando-May, Elisa, Weidtkamp-Peters, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405555
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121714.2
_version_ 1784826022447808512
author Schmidt, Christian
Hanne, Janina
Moore, Josh
Meesters, Christian
Ferrando-May, Elisa
Weidtkamp-Peters, Stefanie
author_facet Schmidt, Christian
Hanne, Janina
Moore, Josh
Meesters, Christian
Ferrando-May, Elisa
Weidtkamp-Peters, Stefanie
author_sort Schmidt, Christian
collection PubMed
description Background:  Knowing the needs of the bioimaging community with respect to research data management (RDM) is essential for identifying measures that enable adoption of the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles for microscopy and bioimage analysis data across disciplines. As an initiative within Germany's National Research Data Infrastructure, we conducted this community survey in summer 2021 to assess the state of the art of bioimaging RDM and the community needs. Methods: An online survey was conducted with a mixed question-type design. We created a questionnaire tailored to relevant topics of the bioimaging community, including specific questions on bioimaging methods and bioimage analysis, as well as more general questions on RDM principles and tools. 203 survey entries were included in the analysis covering the perspectives from various life and biomedical science disciplines and from participants at different career levels. Results: The results highlight the importance and value of bioimaging RDM and data sharing. However, the practical implementation of FAIR practices is impeded by technical hurdles, lack of knowledge, and insecurity about the legal aspects of data sharing. The survey participants request metadata guidelines and annotation tools and endorse the usage of image data management platforms. At present, OMERO (Open Microscopy Environment Remote Objects) is the best known and most widely used platform. Most respondents rely on image processing and analysis, which they regard as the most time-consuming step of the bioimage data workflow. While knowledge about and implementation of electronic lab notebooks and data management plans is limited, respondents acknowledge their potential value for data handling and publication. Conclusion: The bioimaging community acknowledges and endorses the value of RDM and data sharing. Still, there is a need for information, guidance, and standardization to foster the adoption of FAIR data handling. This survey may help inspiring targeted measures to close this gap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9641114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96411142022-11-17 Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey Schmidt, Christian Hanne, Janina Moore, Josh Meesters, Christian Ferrando-May, Elisa Weidtkamp-Peters, Stefanie F1000Res Research Article Background:  Knowing the needs of the bioimaging community with respect to research data management (RDM) is essential for identifying measures that enable adoption of the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles for microscopy and bioimage analysis data across disciplines. As an initiative within Germany's National Research Data Infrastructure, we conducted this community survey in summer 2021 to assess the state of the art of bioimaging RDM and the community needs. Methods: An online survey was conducted with a mixed question-type design. We created a questionnaire tailored to relevant topics of the bioimaging community, including specific questions on bioimaging methods and bioimage analysis, as well as more general questions on RDM principles and tools. 203 survey entries were included in the analysis covering the perspectives from various life and biomedical science disciplines and from participants at different career levels. Results: The results highlight the importance and value of bioimaging RDM and data sharing. However, the practical implementation of FAIR practices is impeded by technical hurdles, lack of knowledge, and insecurity about the legal aspects of data sharing. The survey participants request metadata guidelines and annotation tools and endorse the usage of image data management platforms. At present, OMERO (Open Microscopy Environment Remote Objects) is the best known and most widely used platform. Most respondents rely on image processing and analysis, which they regard as the most time-consuming step of the bioimage data workflow. While knowledge about and implementation of electronic lab notebooks and data management plans is limited, respondents acknowledge their potential value for data handling and publication. Conclusion: The bioimaging community acknowledges and endorses the value of RDM and data sharing. Still, there is a need for information, guidance, and standardization to foster the adoption of FAIR data handling. This survey may help inspiring targeted measures to close this gap. F1000 Research Limited 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9641114/ /pubmed/36405555 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121714.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Schmidt C et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmidt, Christian
Hanne, Janina
Moore, Josh
Meesters, Christian
Ferrando-May, Elisa
Weidtkamp-Peters, Stefanie
Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey
title Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey
title_full Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey
title_fullStr Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey
title_full_unstemmed Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey
title_short Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey
title_sort research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 nfdi4bioimage community survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405555
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121714.2
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtchristian researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey
AT hannejanina researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey
AT moorejosh researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey
AT meesterschristian researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey
AT ferrandomayelisa researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey
AT weidtkamppetersstefanie researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey
AT researchdatamanagementforbioimagingthe2021nfdi4bioimagecommunitysurvey