Cargando…
Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation
Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical ut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.979448 |
_version_ | 1784826036187299840 |
---|---|
author | Roller, Roland Mayrdorfer, Manuel Duettmann, Wiebke Naik, Marcel G. Schmidt, Danilo Halleck, Fabian Hummel, Patrik Burchardt, Aljoscha Möller, Sebastian Dabrock, Peter Osmanodja, Bilgin Budde, Klemens |
author_facet | Roller, Roland Mayrdorfer, Manuel Duettmann, Wiebke Naik, Marcel G. Schmidt, Danilo Halleck, Fabian Hummel, Patrik Burchardt, Aljoscha Möller, Sebastian Dabrock, Peter Osmanodja, Bilgin Budde, Klemens |
author_sort | Roller, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical utility. We present a newly developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for detection of patients at risk for rejection and death-censored graft failure. The CDSS is based on clinical routine data including 1,516 kidney transplant recipients and more than 100,000 data points. In a reader study we compare the performance of physicians at a nephrology department with and without the CDSS. Internal validation shows AUC-ROC scores of 0.83 for rejection, and 0.95 for graft failure. The reader study shows that predictions by physicians converge toward the CDSS. However, performance does not improve (AUC–ROC; 0.6413 vs. 0.6314 for rejection; 0.8072 vs. 0.7778 for graft failure). Finally, the study shows that the CDSS detects partially different patients at risk compared to physicians. This indicates that the combination of both, medical professionals and a CDSS might help detect more patients at risk for graft failure. However, the question of how to integrate such a system efficiently into clinical practice remains open. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9641169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96411692022-11-15 Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation Roller, Roland Mayrdorfer, Manuel Duettmann, Wiebke Naik, Marcel G. Schmidt, Danilo Halleck, Fabian Hummel, Patrik Burchardt, Aljoscha Möller, Sebastian Dabrock, Peter Osmanodja, Bilgin Budde, Klemens Front Public Health Public Health Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical utility. We present a newly developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for detection of patients at risk for rejection and death-censored graft failure. The CDSS is based on clinical routine data including 1,516 kidney transplant recipients and more than 100,000 data points. In a reader study we compare the performance of physicians at a nephrology department with and without the CDSS. Internal validation shows AUC-ROC scores of 0.83 for rejection, and 0.95 for graft failure. The reader study shows that predictions by physicians converge toward the CDSS. However, performance does not improve (AUC–ROC; 0.6413 vs. 0.6314 for rejection; 0.8072 vs. 0.7778 for graft failure). Finally, the study shows that the CDSS detects partially different patients at risk compared to physicians. This indicates that the combination of both, medical professionals and a CDSS might help detect more patients at risk for graft failure. However, the question of how to integrate such a system efficiently into clinical practice remains open. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9641169/ /pubmed/36388342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.979448 Text en Copyright © 2022 Roller, Mayrdorfer, Duettmann, Naik, Schmidt, Halleck, Hummel, Burchardt, Möller, Dabrock, Osmanodja and Budde. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Roller, Roland Mayrdorfer, Manuel Duettmann, Wiebke Naik, Marcel G. Schmidt, Danilo Halleck, Fabian Hummel, Patrik Burchardt, Aljoscha Möller, Sebastian Dabrock, Peter Osmanodja, Bilgin Budde, Klemens Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
title | Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
title_full | Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
title_short | Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
title_sort | evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.979448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rollerroland evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT mayrdorfermanuel evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT duettmannwiebke evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT naikmarcelg evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT schmidtdanilo evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT halleckfabian evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT hummelpatrik evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT burchardtaljoscha evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT mollersebastian evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT dabrockpeter evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT osmanodjabilgin evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation AT buddeklemens evaluationofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemfordetectionofpatientsatriskafterkidneytransplantation |