Cargando…

'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations

In the study and treatment of psychosis, emotional intelligence (EI) and thinking styles are important patient characteristics for successful outcomes in clinical intervention. Anticipation of unpredictable stimuli (AUS) may be understood as an anomalous perception and anomalous cognition in which a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escolà-Gascón, Álex, Wright, Abigail C., Houran, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11303
_version_ 1784826044969123840
author Escolà-Gascón, Álex
Wright, Abigail C.
Houran, James
author_facet Escolà-Gascón, Álex
Wright, Abigail C.
Houran, James
author_sort Escolà-Gascón, Álex
collection PubMed
description In the study and treatment of psychosis, emotional intelligence (EI) and thinking styles are important patient characteristics for successful outcomes in clinical intervention. Anticipation of unpredictable stimuli (AUS) may be understood as an anomalous perception and anomalous cognition in which an individual supposedly senses and recognizes future stimuli in an unexpected way, also referred to as “hunches or premonitions.” This examined the roles of EI and thinking styles in AUSs in convenience samples of healthy participants (n = 237) versus patients diagnosed with psychosis (n = 118). We adjusted several quadratic and exponential regression models according to the obtained functions. Group means were also compared to examine differences in EI scores for participants with psychosis compared to healthy participants. In the healthy group, EI predicted AUSs with a weight between 42% and 58%. Thinking styles were not correlated with AUSs. However, EI was not correlated with AUSs in the clinical group. Patients with psychosis tended to score higher on AUSs and lower on EI and thinking styles compared to participants in the healthy group. We discuss EI as a variable that can contextualize some anomalous perceptions which are otherwise difficult to classify or measure within the classic psychosis continuum model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9641201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96412012022-11-15 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations Escolà-Gascón, Álex Wright, Abigail C. Houran, James Heliyon Research Article In the study and treatment of psychosis, emotional intelligence (EI) and thinking styles are important patient characteristics for successful outcomes in clinical intervention. Anticipation of unpredictable stimuli (AUS) may be understood as an anomalous perception and anomalous cognition in which an individual supposedly senses and recognizes future stimuli in an unexpected way, also referred to as “hunches or premonitions.” This examined the roles of EI and thinking styles in AUSs in convenience samples of healthy participants (n = 237) versus patients diagnosed with psychosis (n = 118). We adjusted several quadratic and exponential regression models according to the obtained functions. Group means were also compared to examine differences in EI scores for participants with psychosis compared to healthy participants. In the healthy group, EI predicted AUSs with a weight between 42% and 58%. Thinking styles were not correlated with AUSs. However, EI was not correlated with AUSs in the clinical group. Patients with psychosis tended to score higher on AUSs and lower on EI and thinking styles compared to participants in the healthy group. We discuss EI as a variable that can contextualize some anomalous perceptions which are otherwise difficult to classify or measure within the classic psychosis continuum model. Elsevier 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9641201/ /pubmed/36387525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11303 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Escolà-Gascón, Álex
Wright, Abigail C.
Houran, James
'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
title 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
title_full 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
title_fullStr 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
title_full_unstemmed 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
title_short 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
title_sort 'feeling' or 'sensing' the future? testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11303
work_keys_str_mv AT escolagasconalex feelingorsensingthefuturetestingforanomalouscognitionsinclinicalversushealthypopulations
AT wrightabigailc feelingorsensingthefuturetestingforanomalouscognitionsinclinicalversushealthypopulations
AT houranjames feelingorsensingthefuturetestingforanomalouscognitionsinclinicalversushealthypopulations