Cargando…
'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations
In the study and treatment of psychosis, emotional intelligence (EI) and thinking styles are important patient characteristics for successful outcomes in clinical intervention. Anticipation of unpredictable stimuli (AUS) may be understood as an anomalous perception and anomalous cognition in which a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11303 |
_version_ | 1784826044969123840 |
---|---|
author | Escolà-Gascón, Álex Wright, Abigail C. Houran, James |
author_facet | Escolà-Gascón, Álex Wright, Abigail C. Houran, James |
author_sort | Escolà-Gascón, Álex |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the study and treatment of psychosis, emotional intelligence (EI) and thinking styles are important patient characteristics for successful outcomes in clinical intervention. Anticipation of unpredictable stimuli (AUS) may be understood as an anomalous perception and anomalous cognition in which an individual supposedly senses and recognizes future stimuli in an unexpected way, also referred to as “hunches or premonitions.” This examined the roles of EI and thinking styles in AUSs in convenience samples of healthy participants (n = 237) versus patients diagnosed with psychosis (n = 118). We adjusted several quadratic and exponential regression models according to the obtained functions. Group means were also compared to examine differences in EI scores for participants with psychosis compared to healthy participants. In the healthy group, EI predicted AUSs with a weight between 42% and 58%. Thinking styles were not correlated with AUSs. However, EI was not correlated with AUSs in the clinical group. Patients with psychosis tended to score higher on AUSs and lower on EI and thinking styles compared to participants in the healthy group. We discuss EI as a variable that can contextualize some anomalous perceptions which are otherwise difficult to classify or measure within the classic psychosis continuum model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9641201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96412012022-11-15 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations Escolà-Gascón, Álex Wright, Abigail C. Houran, James Heliyon Research Article In the study and treatment of psychosis, emotional intelligence (EI) and thinking styles are important patient characteristics for successful outcomes in clinical intervention. Anticipation of unpredictable stimuli (AUS) may be understood as an anomalous perception and anomalous cognition in which an individual supposedly senses and recognizes future stimuli in an unexpected way, also referred to as “hunches or premonitions.” This examined the roles of EI and thinking styles in AUSs in convenience samples of healthy participants (n = 237) versus patients diagnosed with psychosis (n = 118). We adjusted several quadratic and exponential regression models according to the obtained functions. Group means were also compared to examine differences in EI scores for participants with psychosis compared to healthy participants. In the healthy group, EI predicted AUSs with a weight between 42% and 58%. Thinking styles were not correlated with AUSs. However, EI was not correlated with AUSs in the clinical group. Patients with psychosis tended to score higher on AUSs and lower on EI and thinking styles compared to participants in the healthy group. We discuss EI as a variable that can contextualize some anomalous perceptions which are otherwise difficult to classify or measure within the classic psychosis continuum model. Elsevier 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9641201/ /pubmed/36387525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11303 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Escolà-Gascón, Álex Wright, Abigail C. Houran, James 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
title | 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
title_full | 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
title_fullStr | 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
title_full_unstemmed | 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
title_short | 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
title_sort | 'feeling' or 'sensing' the future? testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT escolagasconalex feelingorsensingthefuturetestingforanomalouscognitionsinclinicalversushealthypopulations AT wrightabigailc feelingorsensingthefuturetestingforanomalouscognitionsinclinicalversushealthypopulations AT houranjames feelingorsensingthefuturetestingforanomalouscognitionsinclinicalversushealthypopulations |