Robotic approach for pediatric pulmonary resection: preliminary investigation and comparative study with thoracoscopic approach

BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive pulmonary resection in children is challenging, irrespective of whether it is conducted using a robot or a thoracoscope. This study presents the preliminary results of pediatric robotic pulmonary resection (RPR) and comparison outcomes with conventional thoracoscopic pulmonary resection (TPR). METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in patients underwent RPR (RPR group; n=30) and TPR (TPR group; n=44). The clinical data, including operative time, post-operative body temperature, surgical complications, surgeon’s workload (by NASA-TLX), postoperative hospital stay, and scar score (using the SCAR scale), of both the RPR and TPR groups were collected and compared. RESULTS: Both groups had similar age and weight. The youngest patient belonged to the RPR group and was 6 months old and weighed 8 kg. One case in the RPR group and two in the TPR group were converted to thoracotomy. RPR had a longer total operative time (148.3±36.8 min), but a shorter pure operative time (103.9±28.5 min) than those of the TPR group [118.3±22.5 (P<0.001) and 111.4±18.3 min (P=0.045), respectively]. Compared to the TPR group, fewer patients in the RPR group reported fever postoperatively (2/29 vs. 11/42, P=0.039). The workload of the surgeons was also lower in the RPR group (55.2±4.7 vs. 62.9±6.0, P<0.01). No significant difference was observed in perioperative complications, drainage length, postoperative hospital stays, and scar score of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and effectiveness of the robotic approach are similar to those of the thoracoscopic surgery for pediatric pulmonary resection in children heavier than 8 kg. In addition, the robotic approach shows improved operative dissection efficiency and accuracy for patients and reduced workload for surgeons. Hence, it is beneficial to both surgeons and patients.