Cargando…

Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography

BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a complementary role in the assessment of pulmonary nodules/masses which potentially indicate to cancer. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosis of pulmonary nodules/masses. METHODS: Sixty-e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Shuyi, Shan, Fei, Shi, Yuxin, Liu, Tiefu, Wang, Qingle, Zhang, Haoling, Zhang, Xingwei, Yang, Shan, Zhang, Zhiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389319
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-370
_version_ 1784826081358905344
author Yang, Shuyi
Shan, Fei
Shi, Yuxin
Liu, Tiefu
Wang, Qingle
Zhang, Haoling
Zhang, Xingwei
Yang, Shan
Zhang, Zhiyong
author_facet Yang, Shuyi
Shan, Fei
Shi, Yuxin
Liu, Tiefu
Wang, Qingle
Zhang, Haoling
Zhang, Xingwei
Yang, Shan
Zhang, Zhiyong
author_sort Yang, Shuyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a complementary role in the assessment of pulmonary nodules/masses which potentially indicate to cancer. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosis of pulmonary nodules/masses. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with computed tomography (CT)-detected pulmonary nodules/masses underwent 3T MRI (T1-VIBE, T1-starVIBE, T2-fBLADE turbo spin-echo, and T2-SPACE). The detection rate was calculated for each of the different subgroups of pulmonary nodules according to lung imaging reporting and data system (Lung-RADS). The four MRI sequences were compared in terms of detection rate and image quality-signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and 5-point scoring scale. Agreement of lesion size measurement between CT and MRI was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The picture-SNR, lesion-SNR and CNR of each sequence were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In total, 232 pulmonary lesions were detected by CT. The CT showed 86 solid nodules (SNs) <6 mm, 15 SNs between 6–8 mm, 35 SNs between 8–15 mm, and 52 SNs between 15–30 mm. The T1-VIBE, T1-starVIBE, T2-fBLADE TSE and T2-SPACE sequences accurately detected 141 SNs (141/188, 75%/83.3%), 150 SNs (150/188, 79.8%/100%), 166 SNs (166/188, 88.3%/66.7%) and 169 SNs (169/188, 89.9%/53.3%), respectively. Four ground glass nodules (GGNs) (4/6) were detected by T2-fBLADE TSE. Twelve part-solid nodules (PSNs) (12/22) were detected by T1-VIBE and 20 PSNs (20/22) by T2-SPACE. A total of 100 lesions (2.2±1.4 cm, 0.8–7.3 cm) were accurately detected and measured by the four MRI sequences with ICC >0.96. The picture-SNR, lesion-SNR and CNR by T1-starVIBE were higher than those by T1-VIBE (P<0.001). The lesion-SNR and CNR by T2-fBLADE TSE were higher than those by T2-SPACE (P=0.006, 0.038). 86% of images by T1-starVIBE, 92% by T2-fBLADE TSE, 90% by T2-SPACE and 93% by T1-VIBE were scored 3 or more. CONCLUSIONS: MRI achieves high sensitivity and specificity for different type of pulmonary nodules detection and is an effective alternative to CT as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary nodules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9641349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96413492022-11-15 Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography Yang, Shuyi Shan, Fei Shi, Yuxin Liu, Tiefu Wang, Qingle Zhang, Haoling Zhang, Xingwei Yang, Shan Zhang, Zhiyong J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a complementary role in the assessment of pulmonary nodules/masses which potentially indicate to cancer. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosis of pulmonary nodules/masses. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with computed tomography (CT)-detected pulmonary nodules/masses underwent 3T MRI (T1-VIBE, T1-starVIBE, T2-fBLADE turbo spin-echo, and T2-SPACE). The detection rate was calculated for each of the different subgroups of pulmonary nodules according to lung imaging reporting and data system (Lung-RADS). The four MRI sequences were compared in terms of detection rate and image quality-signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and 5-point scoring scale. Agreement of lesion size measurement between CT and MRI was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The picture-SNR, lesion-SNR and CNR of each sequence were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In total, 232 pulmonary lesions were detected by CT. The CT showed 86 solid nodules (SNs) <6 mm, 15 SNs between 6–8 mm, 35 SNs between 8–15 mm, and 52 SNs between 15–30 mm. The T1-VIBE, T1-starVIBE, T2-fBLADE TSE and T2-SPACE sequences accurately detected 141 SNs (141/188, 75%/83.3%), 150 SNs (150/188, 79.8%/100%), 166 SNs (166/188, 88.3%/66.7%) and 169 SNs (169/188, 89.9%/53.3%), respectively. Four ground glass nodules (GGNs) (4/6) were detected by T2-fBLADE TSE. Twelve part-solid nodules (PSNs) (12/22) were detected by T1-VIBE and 20 PSNs (20/22) by T2-SPACE. A total of 100 lesions (2.2±1.4 cm, 0.8–7.3 cm) were accurately detected and measured by the four MRI sequences with ICC >0.96. The picture-SNR, lesion-SNR and CNR by T1-starVIBE were higher than those by T1-VIBE (P<0.001). The lesion-SNR and CNR by T2-fBLADE TSE were higher than those by T2-SPACE (P=0.006, 0.038). 86% of images by T1-starVIBE, 92% by T2-fBLADE TSE, 90% by T2-SPACE and 93% by T1-VIBE were scored 3 or more. CONCLUSIONS: MRI achieves high sensitivity and specificity for different type of pulmonary nodules detection and is an effective alternative to CT as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary nodules. AME Publishing Company 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9641349/ /pubmed/36389319 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-370 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Shuyi
Shan, Fei
Shi, Yuxin
Liu, Tiefu
Wang, Qingle
Zhang, Haoling
Zhang, Xingwei
Yang, Shan
Zhang, Zhiyong
Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
title Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in routine diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a comparison with computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389319
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-370
work_keys_str_mv AT yangshuyi sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT shanfei sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT shiyuxin sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT liutiefu sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT wangqingle sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT zhanghaoling sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT zhangxingwei sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT yangshan sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT zhangzhiyong sensitivityandspecificityofmagneticresonanceimaginginroutinediagnosisofpulmonarylesionsacomparisonwithcomputedtomography