Cargando…

Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?

BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines recommend the following size cut-offs based on sonographic appearances for subjecting nodules to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy: low risk: 15 mm and intermediate risk and high risk: 10 mm. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a ‘real-world’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ioakim, Stamatina, Syed, Akheel A, Zavros, George, Picolos, Michalis, Persani, Luca, Kyriacou, Angelos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-22-0163
_version_ 1784826161149247488
author Ioakim, Stamatina
Syed, Akheel A
Zavros, George
Picolos, Michalis
Persani, Luca
Kyriacou, Angelos
author_facet Ioakim, Stamatina
Syed, Akheel A
Zavros, George
Picolos, Michalis
Persani, Luca
Kyriacou, Angelos
author_sort Ioakim, Stamatina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines recommend the following size cut-offs based on sonographic appearances for subjecting nodules to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy: low risk: 15 mm and intermediate risk and high risk: 10 mm. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a ‘real-world’ study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the ATA cut-offs against increased thresholds, in the interest of safely limiting FNAs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 604 nodules which were sonographically risk-stratified as per the ATA Guidelines and subsequently subjected to ultrasound-guided FNA. Nodules were cytologically stratified into ‘benign’ (Bethesda class 2) and ‘non-benign’ (Bethesda classes 3–6). We obtained the negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, FNAs that could be spared, missed ‘non-benign’ cytologies and missed carcinomas on histology, according to the ATA cut-offs compared to higher cut-offs. RESULTS: In low-risk nodules, the high performance of NPV (≈91%) is unaffected by increasing the cut-off to 25 mm, and accuracy improves by 39.4%; 46.8% of FNAs could be spared at the expense of few missed B3–B6 cytologies (7.9%) and no missed carcinomas. In intermediate-risk nodules, a 15 mm cut-off increases the NPV by 11.3% and accuracy by 40.7%. The spared FNAs approach 50%, while B3–B6 cytologies are minimal, with no missed carcinomas. In high-risk nodules, low NPV (<35%) and accuracy (<46%) were obtained regardless of cut-off. Moreover, the spared FNAs achieved at higher cut-offs involved numerous missed ‘non-benign’ cytologies and carcinomas. CONCLUSION: It would be clinically safe to increase the ATA cut-offs for FNA in low-risk nodules to 25 mm and in intermediate-risk nodules to 15 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9641794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96417942022-11-14 Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA? Ioakim, Stamatina Syed, Akheel A Zavros, George Picolos, Michalis Persani, Luca Kyriacou, Angelos Eur Thyroid J Research BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines recommend the following size cut-offs based on sonographic appearances for subjecting nodules to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy: low risk: 15 mm and intermediate risk and high risk: 10 mm. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a ‘real-world’ study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the ATA cut-offs against increased thresholds, in the interest of safely limiting FNAs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 604 nodules which were sonographically risk-stratified as per the ATA Guidelines and subsequently subjected to ultrasound-guided FNA. Nodules were cytologically stratified into ‘benign’ (Bethesda class 2) and ‘non-benign’ (Bethesda classes 3–6). We obtained the negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, FNAs that could be spared, missed ‘non-benign’ cytologies and missed carcinomas on histology, according to the ATA cut-offs compared to higher cut-offs. RESULTS: In low-risk nodules, the high performance of NPV (≈91%) is unaffected by increasing the cut-off to 25 mm, and accuracy improves by 39.4%; 46.8% of FNAs could be spared at the expense of few missed B3–B6 cytologies (7.9%) and no missed carcinomas. In intermediate-risk nodules, a 15 mm cut-off increases the NPV by 11.3% and accuracy by 40.7%. The spared FNAs approach 50%, while B3–B6 cytologies are minimal, with no missed carcinomas. In high-risk nodules, low NPV (<35%) and accuracy (<46%) were obtained regardless of cut-off. Moreover, the spared FNAs achieved at higher cut-offs involved numerous missed ‘non-benign’ cytologies and carcinomas. CONCLUSION: It would be clinically safe to increase the ATA cut-offs for FNA in low-risk nodules to 25 mm and in intermediate-risk nodules to 15 mm. Bioscientifica Ltd 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9641794/ /pubmed/36215117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-22-0163 Text en © The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Ioakim, Stamatina
Syed, Akheel A
Zavros, George
Picolos, Michalis
Persani, Luca
Kyriacou, Angelos
Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?
title Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?
title_full Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?
title_fullStr Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?
title_full_unstemmed Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?
title_short Real-world application of ATA Guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for FNA?
title_sort real-world application of ata guidelines in over 600 aspirated thyroid nodules: is it time to change the size cut-offs for fna?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-22-0163
work_keys_str_mv AT ioakimstamatina realworldapplicationofataguidelinesinover600aspiratedthyroidnodulesisittimetochangethesizecutoffsforfna
AT syedakheela realworldapplicationofataguidelinesinover600aspiratedthyroidnodulesisittimetochangethesizecutoffsforfna
AT zavrosgeorge realworldapplicationofataguidelinesinover600aspiratedthyroidnodulesisittimetochangethesizecutoffsforfna
AT picolosmichalis realworldapplicationofataguidelinesinover600aspiratedthyroidnodulesisittimetochangethesizecutoffsforfna
AT persaniluca realworldapplicationofataguidelinesinover600aspiratedthyroidnodulesisittimetochangethesizecutoffsforfna
AT kyriacouangelos realworldapplicationofataguidelinesinover600aspiratedthyroidnodulesisittimetochangethesizecutoffsforfna