Cargando…

Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A biopsychosocial rehabilitation is recommended for chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP); however, its effectiveness compared to the traditional supervised exercise therapy of CNLBP treatment is still unclear. METHODS: This was a parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hrkać, Antonija, Bilić, Darko, Černy-Obrdalj, Edita, Baketarić, Ivan, Puljak, Livia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05908-3
_version_ 1784826188197265408
author Hrkać, Antonija
Bilić, Darko
Černy-Obrdalj, Edita
Baketarić, Ivan
Puljak, Livia
author_facet Hrkać, Antonija
Bilić, Darko
Černy-Obrdalj, Edita
Baketarić, Ivan
Puljak, Livia
author_sort Hrkać, Antonija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A biopsychosocial rehabilitation is recommended for chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP); however, its effectiveness compared to the traditional supervised exercise therapy of CNLBP treatment is still unclear. METHODS: This was a parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial. The sample consisted of 180 participants of both sexes, aged ≥18 years, with CNLBP for ≥3 months. Using web randomization and concealed allocation, they were assigned to three groups; graded activity receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy, group-based combined exercise therapy and education (GA; n = 59), supervised group-based combined exercise therapy and education (SET; n = 63), and a control group receiving usual care (n = 58). Interventions were administered for 4 weeks (8 sessions). The primary outcome was pain intensity. Outcome measures were collected baseline, after interventions (4 weeks), and during two follow-up periods (3 and 6 months). RESULTS: After the intervention, GA had a significant large effect on pain reduction compared to the control group (MD of 22.64 points; 95% CI = 16.10 to 29.19; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 1.70), as well as SET compared with the control group (MD of 21.08 points; 95% CI = 14.64 to 27.52; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 1.39), without significant difference between two intervention groups. At 3 and 6 months of follow-up, GA had a statistically significantly better effect in reducing pain, disability and fear-avoidance beliefs, and improving spinal extensor endurance, range of extension and quality of life compared to SET and the control group. A statistically significantly better effect of SET compared with the control group was found in reducing pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and improving the physical component of quality of life. Harms were not reported. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that graded activity and group-based supervised exercise therapy have beneficial effects over the control group in the treatment of CNLBP. The graded activity was more beneficial than supervised group-based exercise therapy only during the follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04023162; registration date: 17/07/2019). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05908-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9641911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96419112022-11-15 Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Hrkać, Antonija Bilić, Darko Černy-Obrdalj, Edita Baketarić, Ivan Puljak, Livia BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: A biopsychosocial rehabilitation is recommended for chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP); however, its effectiveness compared to the traditional supervised exercise therapy of CNLBP treatment is still unclear. METHODS: This was a parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial. The sample consisted of 180 participants of both sexes, aged ≥18 years, with CNLBP for ≥3 months. Using web randomization and concealed allocation, they were assigned to three groups; graded activity receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy, group-based combined exercise therapy and education (GA; n = 59), supervised group-based combined exercise therapy and education (SET; n = 63), and a control group receiving usual care (n = 58). Interventions were administered for 4 weeks (8 sessions). The primary outcome was pain intensity. Outcome measures were collected baseline, after interventions (4 weeks), and during two follow-up periods (3 and 6 months). RESULTS: After the intervention, GA had a significant large effect on pain reduction compared to the control group (MD of 22.64 points; 95% CI = 16.10 to 29.19; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 1.70), as well as SET compared with the control group (MD of 21.08 points; 95% CI = 14.64 to 27.52; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 1.39), without significant difference between two intervention groups. At 3 and 6 months of follow-up, GA had a statistically significantly better effect in reducing pain, disability and fear-avoidance beliefs, and improving spinal extensor endurance, range of extension and quality of life compared to SET and the control group. A statistically significantly better effect of SET compared with the control group was found in reducing pain, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, and improving the physical component of quality of life. Harms were not reported. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that graded activity and group-based supervised exercise therapy have beneficial effects over the control group in the treatment of CNLBP. The graded activity was more beneficial than supervised group-based exercise therapy only during the follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04023162; registration date: 17/07/2019). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05908-3. BioMed Central 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9641911/ /pubmed/36348309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05908-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hrkać, Antonija
Bilić, Darko
Černy-Obrdalj, Edita
Baketarić, Ivan
Puljak, Livia
Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of supervised exercise therapy with or without biopsychosocial approach for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05908-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hrkacantonija comparisonofsupervisedexercisetherapywithorwithoutbiopsychosocialapproachforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bilicdarko comparisonofsupervisedexercisetherapywithorwithoutbiopsychosocialapproachforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cernyobrdaljedita comparisonofsupervisedexercisetherapywithorwithoutbiopsychosocialapproachforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baketaricivan comparisonofsupervisedexercisetherapywithorwithoutbiopsychosocialapproachforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT puljaklivia comparisonofsupervisedexercisetherapywithorwithoutbiopsychosocialapproachforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial