Cargando…

Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Virtual Patients (VPs) have been receiving considerable attention in medical education as an authentic learning and teaching approach. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of using different approaches of conduction of virtual patients (VPs) on students’ cognitive load and situational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuoad, Sura Ali, El-Sayed, Walid, Marei, Hesham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8
_version_ 1784826197873524736
author Fuoad, Sura Ali
El-Sayed, Walid
Marei, Hesham
author_facet Fuoad, Sura Ali
El-Sayed, Walid
Marei, Hesham
author_sort Fuoad, Sura Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Virtual Patients (VPs) have been receiving considerable attention in medical education as an authentic learning and teaching approach. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of using different approaches of conduction of virtual patients (VPs) on students’ cognitive load and situational interest. METHODS: The study is an experimental study. Two different cohorts have participated during the academic year 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. The first cohort (Group 1) was exposed to a lecture followed by an independent VPs session, and the second cohort (Group 2) was exposed to a collaborative VPs session. The situational interest and Cognitive load were compared between the two groups. All sessions are about one topic related to maxillofacial trauma. RESULTS: Findings showed that there was no significant difference between the median score of the situational interest at repeated time points during the Collaborative VPs (Group 2). However, in group 1, there was a significant difference between the median score of situational interest at repeated time points during independent VPs where the lowest score was found to be at the end of the session. Also, results showed that the collaborative VPs (Group 2) showed a high median score of situational interest than both lecture and independent VPs (Group 1). Furthermore, the study showed that there is no significant difference in the intrinsic cognitive load among the three sessions. However, the extraneous cognitive load was low in collaborative VPs (Group 2) than in both lecture and independent VPs sessions (Group 1). CONCLUSION: The use of VPs in a collaborative interactive learning activity is more effective than its use as an independent learning activity in enhancing students’ situational interest and reducing cognitive load. However, giving independent VPs after the lecture with the same topic is considered a limitation of the study as this can affect the situational interest of the students by filling their gab of knowledge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9641945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96419452022-11-15 Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study Fuoad, Sura Ali El-Sayed, Walid Marei, Hesham BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Virtual Patients (VPs) have been receiving considerable attention in medical education as an authentic learning and teaching approach. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of using different approaches of conduction of virtual patients (VPs) on students’ cognitive load and situational interest. METHODS: The study is an experimental study. Two different cohorts have participated during the academic year 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. The first cohort (Group 1) was exposed to a lecture followed by an independent VPs session, and the second cohort (Group 2) was exposed to a collaborative VPs session. The situational interest and Cognitive load were compared between the two groups. All sessions are about one topic related to maxillofacial trauma. RESULTS: Findings showed that there was no significant difference between the median score of the situational interest at repeated time points during the Collaborative VPs (Group 2). However, in group 1, there was a significant difference between the median score of situational interest at repeated time points during independent VPs where the lowest score was found to be at the end of the session. Also, results showed that the collaborative VPs (Group 2) showed a high median score of situational interest than both lecture and independent VPs (Group 1). Furthermore, the study showed that there is no significant difference in the intrinsic cognitive load among the three sessions. However, the extraneous cognitive load was low in collaborative VPs (Group 2) than in both lecture and independent VPs sessions (Group 1). CONCLUSION: The use of VPs in a collaborative interactive learning activity is more effective than its use as an independent learning activity in enhancing students’ situational interest and reducing cognitive load. However, giving independent VPs after the lecture with the same topic is considered a limitation of the study as this can affect the situational interest of the students by filling their gab of knowledge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8. BioMed Central 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9641945/ /pubmed/36344961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fuoad, Sura Ali
El-Sayed, Walid
Marei, Hesham
Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
title Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
title_full Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
title_fullStr Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
title_short Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
title_sort effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student’s situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03831-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fuoadsuraali effectofdifferentteachinglearningapproachesusingvirtualpatientsonstudentssituationalinterestandcognitiveloadacomparativestudy
AT elsayedwalid effectofdifferentteachinglearningapproachesusingvirtualpatientsonstudentssituationalinterestandcognitiveloadacomparativestudy
AT mareihesham effectofdifferentteachinglearningapproachesusingvirtualpatientsonstudentssituationalinterestandcognitiveloadacomparativestudy