Cargando…
How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: To be able to help and save lives, laypersons are recommended to undergo first aid trainings. The aim of this review was to explore the variety of the elements of the measuring systems to assess the effects of first aid trainings on different aspects of first aid skills including practic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01043-z |
_version_ | 1784826201447071744 |
---|---|
author | Minna, Sihvo Leena, Hiltunen Tommi, Kärkkäinen |
author_facet | Minna, Sihvo Leena, Hiltunen Tommi, Kärkkäinen |
author_sort | Minna, Sihvo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To be able to help and save lives, laypersons are recommended to undergo first aid trainings. The aim of this review was to explore the variety of the elements of the measuring systems to assess the effects of first aid trainings on different aspects of first aid skills including practical skills, knowledge, and emotional perspectives. METHODS: This systematic literature review used Scopus and PubMed databases and searched for studies published between January, 2000, and December, 2020. Out of 2,162 studies meeting the search criteria, 15 studies with quantitative and repeatable evaluation methods to assess first aid skills after first aid training for adults were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Practical skills, especially on the ability to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to use an automated external defibrillator, were the most studied first aid skills after first aid training. This evaluation was based on several standardized measurements and assessed often with the help of a combination of resuscitation manikin and observer. Evaluation methods of performance in other emergency situations are not well standardized. Questionnaires used to assess knowledge of first aid, though seemingly based on guidelines, were also not standardized, either. Emotional aspects of first aid (willingness or self-confidence) were evaluated by highly simplified questionnaires, and answers were graded by five-point Likert scale. CONCLUSION: According to our review, the focus of evaluation methods after first aid training has been on practical skills and especially on CPR. Though the evaluation of first-aid knowledge seems to be straightforward, it is not performed systematically. Evaluation methods for emotional aspects are highly simplified. Overall, standardized measurements and evaluation methods to assess all aspects of first aid skills are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01043-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9641962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96419622022-11-15 How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review Minna, Sihvo Leena, Hiltunen Tommi, Kärkkäinen Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: To be able to help and save lives, laypersons are recommended to undergo first aid trainings. The aim of this review was to explore the variety of the elements of the measuring systems to assess the effects of first aid trainings on different aspects of first aid skills including practical skills, knowledge, and emotional perspectives. METHODS: This systematic literature review used Scopus and PubMed databases and searched for studies published between January, 2000, and December, 2020. Out of 2,162 studies meeting the search criteria, 15 studies with quantitative and repeatable evaluation methods to assess first aid skills after first aid training for adults were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Practical skills, especially on the ability to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to use an automated external defibrillator, were the most studied first aid skills after first aid training. This evaluation was based on several standardized measurements and assessed often with the help of a combination of resuscitation manikin and observer. Evaluation methods of performance in other emergency situations are not well standardized. Questionnaires used to assess knowledge of first aid, though seemingly based on guidelines, were also not standardized, either. Emotional aspects of first aid (willingness or self-confidence) were evaluated by highly simplified questionnaires, and answers were graded by five-point Likert scale. CONCLUSION: According to our review, the focus of evaluation methods after first aid training has been on practical skills and especially on CPR. Though the evaluation of first-aid knowledge seems to be straightforward, it is not performed systematically. Evaluation methods for emotional aspects are highly simplified. Overall, standardized measurements and evaluation methods to assess all aspects of first aid skills are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01043-z. BioMed Central 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9641962/ /pubmed/36348427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01043-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Minna, Sihvo Leena, Hiltunen Tommi, Kärkkäinen How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
title | How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
title_full | How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
title_short | How to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
title_sort | how to evaluate first aid skills after training: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01043-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minnasihvo howtoevaluatefirstaidskillsaftertrainingasystematicreview AT leenahiltunen howtoevaluatefirstaidskillsaftertrainingasystematicreview AT tommikarkkainen howtoevaluatefirstaidskillsaftertrainingasystematicreview |