Current status of robot‐assisted surgery in the clinical application of trauma orthopedics in China: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To elaborate on the development and characteristics of trauma orthopedic robots and their real curative effect in a clinical application through the collection and analysis of relevant literature and reported clinical results. METHOD: We conducted the Embase, ScienceDirect, Pubmed, Medline, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP search of the literature on robotic‐assisted surgery in trauma orthopedics in China. We combined search terms with “robotic surgery/artificial intelligence surgery/navigation surgery,” “trauma/trauma orthopedics,” and “China/Chinese.” The exclusion criteria were: (1) articles in languages other than English or Chinese, (2) articles focused on other topics other than robotic‐assisted surgery in trauma orthopedics of China, (3) article types were not clinical studies (reviews, basic research, etc.), and (4) articles were not included in the Chinese core journals or science citation index. Authors, type of surgery, robot type, and clinical research results were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: There were three categories of surgical robots in the clinical application of trauma orthopedics (TiRobot, electromagnetic navigation surgical robots, and small medical robots developed by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital). In terms of blood loss, the fluoroscopy time, and fluoroscopy frequency, most studies found that the robot group was significantly better than the traditional group. CONCLUSIONS: Robot‐assisted surgery has obvious advantages in accuracy, stability, and reducing intraoperative radiation exposure, but there is no final conclusion about functional recovery.