Cargando…
Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9642836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012 |
_version_ | 1784826395957919744 |
---|---|
author | Quinn, Laura Veenith, Tonny Bion, Julian Hemming, Karla Whitehouse, Tony Lilford, Richard |
author_facet | Quinn, Laura Veenith, Tonny Bion, Julian Hemming, Karla Whitehouse, Tony Lilford, Richard |
author_sort | Quinn, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Meta-analysis of randomised trials is typically performed using a frequentist approach, and although reporting confidence intervals, interpretation is usually based on statistical significance. To provide a robust basis for clinical decision-making, we completed the search used from the previous review and analysed the data using Bayesian methods to estimate posterior probabilities of the effect of early tracheostomy on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The search was completed for RCTS comparing early vs late tracheostomy in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library in June 2022. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes short-term mortality, VAP, duration of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. A Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with uninformative priors. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals were reported alongside posterior probabilities for any benefit (RR<1; SMD<0), a small benefit (number needed to treat, 200; SMD<–0.5), or modest benefit (number needed to treat, 100; SMD<–1). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs with 3508 patients were included. Comparing patients with early vs late tracheostomy, the posterior probabilities for any benefit, small benefit, and modest benefit, respectively, were: 99%, 99%, and 99% for short-term mortality; 94%, 78%, and 51% for VAP; 97%, 43%, and 1% for duration of mechanical ventilation; and 97%, 75%, and 27% and for length of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian meta-analysis suggests a high probability that early tracheostomy compared with delayed tracheostomy has at least some benefit across all clinical outcomes considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9642836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96428362022-11-15 Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients Quinn, Laura Veenith, Tonny Bion, Julian Hemming, Karla Whitehouse, Tony Lilford, Richard Br J Anaesth Review Article BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Meta-analysis of randomised trials is typically performed using a frequentist approach, and although reporting confidence intervals, interpretation is usually based on statistical significance. To provide a robust basis for clinical decision-making, we completed the search used from the previous review and analysed the data using Bayesian methods to estimate posterior probabilities of the effect of early tracheostomy on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The search was completed for RCTS comparing early vs late tracheostomy in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library in June 2022. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes short-term mortality, VAP, duration of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. A Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with uninformative priors. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals were reported alongside posterior probabilities for any benefit (RR<1; SMD<0), a small benefit (number needed to treat, 200; SMD<–0.5), or modest benefit (number needed to treat, 100; SMD<–1). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs with 3508 patients were included. Comparing patients with early vs late tracheostomy, the posterior probabilities for any benefit, small benefit, and modest benefit, respectively, were: 99%, 99%, and 99% for short-term mortality; 94%, 78%, and 51% for VAP; 97%, 43%, and 1% for duration of mechanical ventilation; and 97%, 75%, and 27% and for length of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian meta-analysis suggests a high probability that early tracheostomy compared with delayed tracheostomy has at least some benefit across all clinical outcomes considered. Elsevier 2022-11 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9642836/ /pubmed/36163077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Quinn, Laura Veenith, Tonny Bion, Julian Hemming, Karla Whitehouse, Tony Lilford, Richard Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients |
title | Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients |
title_full | Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients |
title_fullStr | Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients |
title_short | Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients |
title_sort | bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in icu patients |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9642836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quinnlaura bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients AT veenithtonny bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients AT bionjulian bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients AT hemmingkarla bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients AT whitehousetony bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients AT lilfordrichard bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients |