Cargando…

Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients

BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinn, Laura, Veenith, Tonny, Bion, Julian, Hemming, Karla, Whitehouse, Tony, Lilford, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9642836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012
_version_ 1784826395957919744
author Quinn, Laura
Veenith, Tonny
Bion, Julian
Hemming, Karla
Whitehouse, Tony
Lilford, Richard
author_facet Quinn, Laura
Veenith, Tonny
Bion, Julian
Hemming, Karla
Whitehouse, Tony
Lilford, Richard
author_sort Quinn, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Meta-analysis of randomised trials is typically performed using a frequentist approach, and although reporting confidence intervals, interpretation is usually based on statistical significance. To provide a robust basis for clinical decision-making, we completed the search used from the previous review and analysed the data using Bayesian methods to estimate posterior probabilities of the effect of early tracheostomy on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The search was completed for RCTS comparing early vs late tracheostomy in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library in June 2022. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes short-term mortality, VAP, duration of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. A Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with uninformative priors. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals were reported alongside posterior probabilities for any benefit (RR<1; SMD<0), a small benefit (number needed to treat, 200; SMD<–0.5), or modest benefit (number needed to treat, 100; SMD<–1). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs with 3508 patients were included. Comparing patients with early vs late tracheostomy, the posterior probabilities for any benefit, small benefit, and modest benefit, respectively, were: 99%, 99%, and 99% for short-term mortality; 94%, 78%, and 51% for VAP; 97%, 43%, and 1% for duration of mechanical ventilation; and 97%, 75%, and 27% and for length of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian meta-analysis suggests a high probability that early tracheostomy compared with delayed tracheostomy has at least some benefit across all clinical outcomes considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9642836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96428362022-11-15 Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients Quinn, Laura Veenith, Tonny Bion, Julian Hemming, Karla Whitehouse, Tony Lilford, Richard Br J Anaesth Review Article BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Meta-analysis of randomised trials is typically performed using a frequentist approach, and although reporting confidence intervals, interpretation is usually based on statistical significance. To provide a robust basis for clinical decision-making, we completed the search used from the previous review and analysed the data using Bayesian methods to estimate posterior probabilities of the effect of early tracheostomy on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The search was completed for RCTS comparing early vs late tracheostomy in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library in June 2022. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes short-term mortality, VAP, duration of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. A Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with uninformative priors. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals were reported alongside posterior probabilities for any benefit (RR<1; SMD<0), a small benefit (number needed to treat, 200; SMD<–0.5), or modest benefit (number needed to treat, 100; SMD<–1). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs with 3508 patients were included. Comparing patients with early vs late tracheostomy, the posterior probabilities for any benefit, small benefit, and modest benefit, respectively, were: 99%, 99%, and 99% for short-term mortality; 94%, 78%, and 51% for VAP; 97%, 43%, and 1% for duration of mechanical ventilation; and 97%, 75%, and 27% and for length of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian meta-analysis suggests a high probability that early tracheostomy compared with delayed tracheostomy has at least some benefit across all clinical outcomes considered. Elsevier 2022-11 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9642836/ /pubmed/36163077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Quinn, Laura
Veenith, Tonny
Bion, Julian
Hemming, Karla
Whitehouse, Tony
Lilford, Richard
Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
title Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
title_full Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
title_fullStr Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
title_short Bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in ICU patients
title_sort bayesian analysis of a systematic review of early versus late tracheostomy in icu patients
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9642836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.012
work_keys_str_mv AT quinnlaura bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients
AT veenithtonny bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients
AT bionjulian bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients
AT hemmingkarla bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients
AT whitehousetony bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients
AT lilfordrichard bayesiananalysisofasystematicreviewofearlyversuslatetracheostomyinicupatients