Cargando…

Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model

The BEEHAVE model simulates the population dynamics and foraging activity of a single honey bee colony (Apis mellifera) in great detail. Although it still makes numerous simplifying assumptions, it appears to capture a wide range of empirical observations. It could, therefore, in principle, also be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schödl, Isabel, Odemer, Richard, Becher, Matthias A., Berg, Stefan, Otten, Christoph, Grimm, Volker, Groeneveld, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9456
_version_ 1784826448429711360
author Schödl, Isabel
Odemer, Richard
Becher, Matthias A.
Berg, Stefan
Otten, Christoph
Grimm, Volker
Groeneveld, Jürgen
author_facet Schödl, Isabel
Odemer, Richard
Becher, Matthias A.
Berg, Stefan
Otten, Christoph
Grimm, Volker
Groeneveld, Jürgen
author_sort Schödl, Isabel
collection PubMed
description The BEEHAVE model simulates the population dynamics and foraging activity of a single honey bee colony (Apis mellifera) in great detail. Although it still makes numerous simplifying assumptions, it appears to capture a wide range of empirical observations. It could, therefore, in principle, also be used as a tool in beekeeper education, as it allows the implementation and comparison of different management options. Here, we focus on treatments aimed at controlling the mite Varroa destructor. However, since BEEHAVE was developed in the UK, mite treatment includes the use of a synthetic acaricide, which is not part of Good Beekeeping Practice in Germany. A practice that consists of drone brood removal from April to June, treatment with formic acid in August/September, and treatment with oxalic acid in November/December. We implemented these measures, focusing on the timing, frequency, and spacing between drone brood removals. The effect of drone brood removal and acid treatment, individually or in combination, on a mite‐infested colony was examined. We quantify the efficacy of Varroa mite control as the reduction of mites in treated bee colonies compared to untreated bee colonies. We found that drone brood removal was very effective, reducing mites by 90% at the end of the first simulation year after the introduction of mites. This value was significantly higher than the 50–67% reduction expected by bee experts and confirmed by empirical studies. However, literature reports varying percent reductions in mite numbers from 10 to 85% after drone brood removal. The discrepancy between model results, empirical data, and expert estimates indicate that these three sources should be reviewed and refined, as all are based on simplifying assumptions. These results and the adaptation of BEEHAVE to the Good Beekeeping Practice are a decisive step forward for the future use of BEEHAVE in beekeeper education in Germany and anywhere where organic acids and drone brood removal are utilized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96430732022-11-14 Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model Schödl, Isabel Odemer, Richard Becher, Matthias A. Berg, Stefan Otten, Christoph Grimm, Volker Groeneveld, Jürgen Ecol Evol Research Articles The BEEHAVE model simulates the population dynamics and foraging activity of a single honey bee colony (Apis mellifera) in great detail. Although it still makes numerous simplifying assumptions, it appears to capture a wide range of empirical observations. It could, therefore, in principle, also be used as a tool in beekeeper education, as it allows the implementation and comparison of different management options. Here, we focus on treatments aimed at controlling the mite Varroa destructor. However, since BEEHAVE was developed in the UK, mite treatment includes the use of a synthetic acaricide, which is not part of Good Beekeeping Practice in Germany. A practice that consists of drone brood removal from April to June, treatment with formic acid in August/September, and treatment with oxalic acid in November/December. We implemented these measures, focusing on the timing, frequency, and spacing between drone brood removals. The effect of drone brood removal and acid treatment, individually or in combination, on a mite‐infested colony was examined. We quantify the efficacy of Varroa mite control as the reduction of mites in treated bee colonies compared to untreated bee colonies. We found that drone brood removal was very effective, reducing mites by 90% at the end of the first simulation year after the introduction of mites. This value was significantly higher than the 50–67% reduction expected by bee experts and confirmed by empirical studies. However, literature reports varying percent reductions in mite numbers from 10 to 85% after drone brood removal. The discrepancy between model results, empirical data, and expert estimates indicate that these three sources should be reviewed and refined, as all are based on simplifying assumptions. These results and the adaptation of BEEHAVE to the Good Beekeeping Practice are a decisive step forward for the future use of BEEHAVE in beekeeper education in Germany and anywhere where organic acids and drone brood removal are utilized. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9643073/ /pubmed/36381398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9456 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Schödl, Isabel
Odemer, Richard
Becher, Matthias A.
Berg, Stefan
Otten, Christoph
Grimm, Volker
Groeneveld, Jürgen
Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model
title Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model
title_full Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model
title_fullStr Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model
title_short Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model
title_sort simulation of varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: demonstration of good beekeeping practice for germany in the beehave model
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9456
work_keys_str_mv AT schodlisabel simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel
AT odemerrichard simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel
AT bechermatthiasa simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel
AT bergstefan simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel
AT ottenchristoph simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel
AT grimmvolker simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel
AT groeneveldjurgen simulationofvarroamitecontrolinhoneybeecolonieswithoutsyntheticacaricidesdemonstrationofgoodbeekeepingpracticeforgermanyinthebeehavemodel