Cargando…

The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel analytical approach for randomized controlled trials that are underpowered because of low participant enrollment or engagement. DATA SOURCES: Reanalysis of data for 805 patients randomized as part of a pilot complex care intervention in 2015–2016 in a large delivery s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, John L., Davis, Anna C., Schneider, Eric C., Hull, Michaela M., McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35752926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14014
_version_ 1784826450025644032
author Adams, John L.
Davis, Anna C.
Schneider, Eric C.
Hull, Michaela M.
McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Adams, John L.
Davis, Anna C.
Schneider, Eric C.
Hull, Michaela M.
McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Adams, John L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel analytical approach for randomized controlled trials that are underpowered because of low participant enrollment or engagement. DATA SOURCES: Reanalysis of data for 805 patients randomized as part of a pilot complex care intervention in 2015–2016 in a large delivery system. In the pilot randomized trial, only 64.6% of patients assigned to the intervention group participated. STUDY DESIGN: A case study and simulation. The “Distillation Method” capitalizes on the frequently observed correlation between the probability of subjects' participation or engagement in the intervention and the magnitude of benefit they experience. The novel method involves three stages: first, it uses baseline covariates to generate predicted probabilities of participation. Next, these are used to produce nested subsamples of the randomized intervention and control groups that are more concentrated with subjects who were likely to participate/engage. Finally, for the outcomes of interest, standard statistical methods are used to re‐evaluate intervention effectiveness in these concentrated subsets. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We assembled secondary data on patients who were randomized to the pilot intervention for one year prior to randomization and two follow‐up years. Data included program enrollment status, membership data, demographics, utilization, costs, and clinical data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using baseline covariates only, Generalized Boosted Regression Models predicting program enrollment performed well (AUC 0.884). We then distilled the full randomized sample to increasing levels of concentration and reanalyzed program outcomes. We found statistically significant differences in outpatient utilization and emergency department utilization (both follow‐up years), and in total costs (follow‐up year two only) at select levels of population concentration. CONCLUSIONS: By offering an internally valid analytic framework, the Distillation Method can increase the power to detect effects by redefining the estimand to subpopulations with higher enrollment probabilities and stronger average treatment effects while maintaining the original randomization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96430922022-11-14 The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted Adams, John L. Davis, Anna C. Schneider, Eric C. Hull, Michaela M. McGlynn, Elizabeth A. Health Serv Res Methods Corner OBJECTIVE: To introduce a novel analytical approach for randomized controlled trials that are underpowered because of low participant enrollment or engagement. DATA SOURCES: Reanalysis of data for 805 patients randomized as part of a pilot complex care intervention in 2015–2016 in a large delivery system. In the pilot randomized trial, only 64.6% of patients assigned to the intervention group participated. STUDY DESIGN: A case study and simulation. The “Distillation Method” capitalizes on the frequently observed correlation between the probability of subjects' participation or engagement in the intervention and the magnitude of benefit they experience. The novel method involves three stages: first, it uses baseline covariates to generate predicted probabilities of participation. Next, these are used to produce nested subsamples of the randomized intervention and control groups that are more concentrated with subjects who were likely to participate/engage. Finally, for the outcomes of interest, standard statistical methods are used to re‐evaluate intervention effectiveness in these concentrated subsets. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We assembled secondary data on patients who were randomized to the pilot intervention for one year prior to randomization and two follow‐up years. Data included program enrollment status, membership data, demographics, utilization, costs, and clinical data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using baseline covariates only, Generalized Boosted Regression Models predicting program enrollment performed well (AUC 0.884). We then distilled the full randomized sample to increasing levels of concentration and reanalyzed program outcomes. We found statistically significant differences in outpatient utilization and emergency department utilization (both follow‐up years), and in total costs (follow‐up year two only) at select levels of population concentration. CONCLUSIONS: By offering an internally valid analytic framework, the Distillation Method can increase the power to detect effects by redefining the estimand to subpopulations with higher enrollment probabilities and stronger average treatment effects while maintaining the original randomization. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-07-19 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9643092/ /pubmed/35752926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14014 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Corner
Adams, John L.
Davis, Anna C.
Schneider, Eric C.
Hull, Michaela M.
McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
title The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
title_full The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
title_fullStr The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
title_full_unstemmed The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
title_short The distillation method: A novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
title_sort distillation method: a novel approach for analyzing randomized trials when exposure to the intervention is diluted
topic Methods Corner
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35752926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14014
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsjohnl thedistillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT davisannac thedistillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT schneiderericc thedistillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT hullmichaelam thedistillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT mcglynnelizabetha thedistillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT adamsjohnl distillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT davisannac distillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT schneiderericc distillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT hullmichaelam distillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted
AT mcglynnelizabetha distillationmethodanovelapproachforanalyzingrandomizedtrialswhenexposuretotheinterventionisdiluted