Cargando…

Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research

BACKGROUND: Although pediatric flexible-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has developed into a standard in dysphagia diagnostics, there are no valid protocols and procedures for children available to date. OBJECTIVE: This systematic PROSPERO-registered review aimed to identify implementatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zang, Jana, Kiehn, Saskia, Flügel, Till, Koseki, Jana-Christiane, Nießen, Almut, Kim, Susan Hyoungeun, Pflug, Christina, Nienstedt, Julie Cläre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35430715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10446-0
_version_ 1784826462245748736
author Zang, Jana
Kiehn, Saskia
Flügel, Till
Koseki, Jana-Christiane
Nießen, Almut
Kim, Susan Hyoungeun
Pflug, Christina
Nienstedt, Julie Cläre
author_facet Zang, Jana
Kiehn, Saskia
Flügel, Till
Koseki, Jana-Christiane
Nießen, Almut
Kim, Susan Hyoungeun
Pflug, Christina
Nienstedt, Julie Cläre
author_sort Zang, Jana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although pediatric flexible-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has developed into a standard in dysphagia diagnostics, there are no valid protocols and procedures for children available to date. OBJECTIVE: This systematic PROSPERO-registered review aimed to identify implementation protocols for pediatric FEES described in research studies, and to analyze them in detail concerning procedural steps, equipment, and reported outcome. METHODS: Included were all studies reporting a pediatric FEES protocol for children aged 0–18 years, if they described at least two criteria defined in advance. The databases MEDLINE and CINHAL were searched systematically from January 2000 to February 2021. Risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. A narrative synthesis of the FEES protocols was conducted and the results compared in tabular form. RESULTS: In total 22 studies were included, reporting on FEES in 1547 infants, children, and adolescents with a wide range of diagnoses. It was possible to identify protocols related to all age groups in general as well as to particular groups such as breastfed or bottle-fed infants. None of the included studies demonstrated a good methodological quality; all studies had missing data. Uniform implementation for sub-groups could not be determined. The reported outcome of FEES examinations could not be compared. DISCUSSION: None of the included studies showed good methodological quality and a significant amount of data were missing; the review still offers a systematic basis for future research to close the serious gap in the area of pediatric FEES. A proposal is made for a minimum requirement for pediatric FEES protocols in scientific studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96431732022-11-15 Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research Zang, Jana Kiehn, Saskia Flügel, Till Koseki, Jana-Christiane Nießen, Almut Kim, Susan Hyoungeun Pflug, Christina Nienstedt, Julie Cläre Dysphagia Original Article BACKGROUND: Although pediatric flexible-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has developed into a standard in dysphagia diagnostics, there are no valid protocols and procedures for children available to date. OBJECTIVE: This systematic PROSPERO-registered review aimed to identify implementation protocols for pediatric FEES described in research studies, and to analyze them in detail concerning procedural steps, equipment, and reported outcome. METHODS: Included were all studies reporting a pediatric FEES protocol for children aged 0–18 years, if they described at least two criteria defined in advance. The databases MEDLINE and CINHAL were searched systematically from January 2000 to February 2021. Risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. A narrative synthesis of the FEES protocols was conducted and the results compared in tabular form. RESULTS: In total 22 studies were included, reporting on FEES in 1547 infants, children, and adolescents with a wide range of diagnoses. It was possible to identify protocols related to all age groups in general as well as to particular groups such as breastfed or bottle-fed infants. None of the included studies demonstrated a good methodological quality; all studies had missing data. Uniform implementation for sub-groups could not be determined. The reported outcome of FEES examinations could not be compared. DISCUSSION: None of the included studies showed good methodological quality and a significant amount of data were missing; the review still offers a systematic basis for future research to close the serious gap in the area of pediatric FEES. A proposal is made for a minimum requirement for pediatric FEES protocols in scientific studies. Springer US 2022-04-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9643173/ /pubmed/35430715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10446-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zang, Jana
Kiehn, Saskia
Flügel, Till
Koseki, Jana-Christiane
Nießen, Almut
Kim, Susan Hyoungeun
Pflug, Christina
Nienstedt, Julie Cläre
Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research
title Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research
title_full Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research
title_fullStr Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research
title_short Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research
title_sort implementation of pediatric flexible-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: a systematic review and recommendations for future research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35430715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10446-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zangjana implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT kiehnsaskia implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT flugeltill implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT kosekijanachristiane implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT nießenalmut implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT kimsusanhyoungeun implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT pflugchristina implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT nienstedtjulieclare implementationofpediatricflexibleendoscopicevaluationofswallowingasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfutureresearch