Cargando…

Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective method for preventing rabies, a highly fatal infection in exposed persons. Malaysia is currently using the purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV). Nonetheless, there are other commercially available vaccine types and regimens. This system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Norfazilah, Nawi, Azmawati Mohammed, Jamhari, Mohd Nazrin, Nurumal, Siti Rohani, Mansor, Juliana, Zamzuri, Mohd ‘Ammar Ihsan Ahmad, Yin, Teh Li, Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407746
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i5.9412
_version_ 1784826476923715584
author Ahmad, Norfazilah
Nawi, Azmawati Mohammed
Jamhari, Mohd Nazrin
Nurumal, Siti Rohani
Mansor, Juliana
Zamzuri, Mohd ‘Ammar Ihsan Ahmad
Yin, Teh Li
Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat
author_facet Ahmad, Norfazilah
Nawi, Azmawati Mohammed
Jamhari, Mohd Nazrin
Nurumal, Siti Rohani
Mansor, Juliana
Zamzuri, Mohd ‘Ammar Ihsan Ahmad
Yin, Teh Li
Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat
author_sort Ahmad, Norfazilah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective method for preventing rabies, a highly fatal infection in exposed persons. Malaysia is currently using the purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV). Nonetheless, there are other commercially available vaccine types and regimens. This systematic review aimed at comparing the effectiveness of the different PEP vaccines, regimens and routes of administration among Asian populations. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles reporting on the effectiveness of PEP vaccination against rabies among Asian populations between 2015 and 2019. RESULTS: Our search identified 11 relevant studies. Majority of study either used PCECV or PVRV type of vaccine, with different regimes and method. All are non-inferior to the other. Most of the studies recorded adequate response by Day 14 of vaccination. Nonetheless, the intradermal (ID) vaccination used minimal volume of vaccine used in all settings, thus cost less and the concurrent administration of RIG to the wound(s) doesn’t affect the RVNA GMT response. CONCLUSION: PCECV, using either the Essen or Zagreb regimen, might be a useful alternative for the healthy population in the context of PVRV shortage, especially during an outbreak. Use of the Zagreb or Thai Red Cross (TRC) regimens can be considered (either PVRV or PCECV), as both demonstrate good immunogenic outcomes in Asian populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96432352022-11-18 Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review Ahmad, Norfazilah Nawi, Azmawati Mohammed Jamhari, Mohd Nazrin Nurumal, Siti Rohani Mansor, Juliana Zamzuri, Mohd ‘Ammar Ihsan Ahmad Yin, Teh Li Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat Iran J Public Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective method for preventing rabies, a highly fatal infection in exposed persons. Malaysia is currently using the purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV). Nonetheless, there are other commercially available vaccine types and regimens. This systematic review aimed at comparing the effectiveness of the different PEP vaccines, regimens and routes of administration among Asian populations. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles reporting on the effectiveness of PEP vaccination against rabies among Asian populations between 2015 and 2019. RESULTS: Our search identified 11 relevant studies. Majority of study either used PCECV or PVRV type of vaccine, with different regimes and method. All are non-inferior to the other. Most of the studies recorded adequate response by Day 14 of vaccination. Nonetheless, the intradermal (ID) vaccination used minimal volume of vaccine used in all settings, thus cost less and the concurrent administration of RIG to the wound(s) doesn’t affect the RVNA GMT response. CONCLUSION: PCECV, using either the Essen or Zagreb regimen, might be a useful alternative for the healthy population in the context of PVRV shortage, especially during an outbreak. Use of the Zagreb or Thai Red Cross (TRC) regimens can be considered (either PVRV or PCECV), as both demonstrate good immunogenic outcomes in Asian populations. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9643235/ /pubmed/36407746 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i5.9412 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ahmad et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ahmad, Norfazilah
Nawi, Azmawati Mohammed
Jamhari, Mohd Nazrin
Nurumal, Siti Rohani
Mansor, Juliana
Zamzuri, Mohd ‘Ammar Ihsan Ahmad
Yin, Teh Li
Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat
Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review
title Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review
title_full Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review
title_short Post-Exposure Prophylactic Vaccination against Rabies: A Systematic Review
title_sort post-exposure prophylactic vaccination against rabies: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407746
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i5.9412
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadnorfazilah postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT nawiazmawatimohammed postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT jamharimohdnazrin postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT nurumalsitirohani postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT mansorjuliana postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT zamzurimohdammarihsanahmad postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT yintehli postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview
AT hassanmohdrohaizat postexposureprophylacticvaccinationagainstrabiesasystematicreview