Cargando…

Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND: The study aims to compare the prognostic performance of conventional scoring systems to a machine learning (ML) model on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to discriminate between the patients with and without major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and to find the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba, Fazeli, Amir, Hedayat, Behnam, Mokhtari, Hamid, Jalali, Arash, Ahmadi, Pooria, Chalian, Hamid, Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi, Shirani, Shapour, Omidi, Negar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386332
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.994483
_version_ 1784826541654409216
author Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba
Fazeli, Amir
Hedayat, Behnam
Mokhtari, Hamid
Jalali, Arash
Ahmadi, Pooria
Chalian, Hamid
Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Shirani, Shapour
Omidi, Negar
author_facet Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba
Fazeli, Amir
Hedayat, Behnam
Mokhtari, Hamid
Jalali, Arash
Ahmadi, Pooria
Chalian, Hamid
Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Shirani, Shapour
Omidi, Negar
author_sort Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aims to compare the prognostic performance of conventional scoring systems to a machine learning (ML) model on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to discriminate between the patients with and without major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and to find the most important contributing factor of MACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November to December 2019, 500 of 1586 CCTA scans were included and analyzed, then six conventional scores were calculated for each participant, and seven ML models were designed. Our study endpoints were all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, late coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. Score performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: Of 500 patients (mean age: 60 ± 10; 53.8% male subjects) referred for CCTA, 416 patients have met inclusion criteria, 46 patients with early (<90 days) cardiac evaluation (due to the inability to clarify the reason for the assessment, deterioration of the symptoms vs. the CCTA result), and 38 patients because of missed follow-up were not enrolled in the final analysis. Forty-six patients (11.0%) developed MACE within 20.5 ± 7.9 months of follow-up. Compared to conventional scores, ML models showed better performance, except only one model which is eXtreme Gradient Boosting had lower performance than conventional scoring systems (AUC:0.824, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.701–0.947). Between ML models, random forest, ensemble with generalized linear, and ensemble with naive Bayes were shown to have higher prognostic performance (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85–0.99, AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.98, and AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82–0.97), respectively. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) had the highest correlation with MACE. CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional scoring system, ML models using CCTA scans show improved prognostic prediction for MACE. Anatomical features were more important than clinical characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96435002022-11-15 Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba Fazeli, Amir Hedayat, Behnam Mokhtari, Hamid Jalali, Arash Ahmadi, Pooria Chalian, Hamid Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi Shirani, Shapour Omidi, Negar Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: The study aims to compare the prognostic performance of conventional scoring systems to a machine learning (ML) model on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to discriminate between the patients with and without major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and to find the most important contributing factor of MACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November to December 2019, 500 of 1586 CCTA scans were included and analyzed, then six conventional scores were calculated for each participant, and seven ML models were designed. Our study endpoints were all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, late coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. Score performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: Of 500 patients (mean age: 60 ± 10; 53.8% male subjects) referred for CCTA, 416 patients have met inclusion criteria, 46 patients with early (<90 days) cardiac evaluation (due to the inability to clarify the reason for the assessment, deterioration of the symptoms vs. the CCTA result), and 38 patients because of missed follow-up were not enrolled in the final analysis. Forty-six patients (11.0%) developed MACE within 20.5 ± 7.9 months of follow-up. Compared to conventional scores, ML models showed better performance, except only one model which is eXtreme Gradient Boosting had lower performance than conventional scoring systems (AUC:0.824, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.701–0.947). Between ML models, random forest, ensemble with generalized linear, and ensemble with naive Bayes were shown to have higher prognostic performance (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85–0.99, AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.98, and AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82–0.97), respectively. Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) had the highest correlation with MACE. CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional scoring system, ML models using CCTA scans show improved prognostic prediction for MACE. Anatomical features were more important than clinical characteristics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9643500/ /pubmed/36386332 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.994483 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ghorashi, Fazeli, Hedayat, Mokhtari, Jalali, Ahmadi, Chalian, Bragazzi, Shirani and Omidi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba
Fazeli, Amir
Hedayat, Behnam
Mokhtari, Hamid
Jalali, Arash
Ahmadi, Pooria
Chalian, Hamid
Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Shirani, Shapour
Omidi, Negar
Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
title Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
title_full Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
title_fullStr Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
title_short Comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
title_sort comparison of conventional scoring systems to machine learning models for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386332
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.994483
work_keys_str_mv AT ghorashiseyyedmojtaba comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT fazeliamir comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT hedayatbehnam comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT mokhtarihamid comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT jalaliarash comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT ahmadipooria comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT chalianhamid comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT bragazzinicolaluigi comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT shiranishapour comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography
AT omidinegar comparisonofconventionalscoringsystemstomachinelearningmodelsforthepredictionofmajoradversecardiovasculareventsinpatientsundergoingcoronarycomputedtomographyangiography