Cargando…
Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
We aimed to validate and prove the novel risk score models of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-specific disease risk group (AML-DRG) and AML-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-composite risk (AML-HCT-CR) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20735-1 |
_version_ | 1784826550526410752 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Weijie Li, Xiaoning Zhang, Ran Bian, Zhilei Zhang, Suping Li, Li Xing, Haizhou Liu, Changfeng Xie, Xinsheng Jiang, Zhongxing Fang, Xiaosheng Wan, Dingming Yu, Jifeng |
author_facet | Cao, Weijie Li, Xiaoning Zhang, Ran Bian, Zhilei Zhang, Suping Li, Li Xing, Haizhou Liu, Changfeng Xie, Xinsheng Jiang, Zhongxing Fang, Xiaosheng Wan, Dingming Yu, Jifeng |
author_sort | Cao, Weijie |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to validate and prove the novel risk score models of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-specific disease risk group (AML-DRG) and AML-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-composite risk (AML-HCT-CR) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT). Among the 172 AML patients analysed, 48.3% (n = 83) were females. Median age was 31.5 years (range 14 to 62 years), two patients was more than 60 years old (1.2%). Median follow-up was 44 months (range 1 to 94 months). According to the AML-DRG model, 109, 49 and 14 patients were in low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. According to the AML-HCT-CR model, 108, 30, 20 and 14 patients were in low-, intermediate-, high- and very high-risk group, respectively. Our results showed that the AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models significantly predicted cumulative incidence of relapse (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). But AML-DRG model was not associated with NRM (p = 0.072). Univariate analysis showed that the AML-DRG model could better stratify AML patients into different risk groups compared to the AML-HCT-CR model. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognostic impact of AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models on post-transplant OS was independent to age, sex, conditioning type, transplant modality, and stem cell source (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models can be used to effectively predict post-transplant survival in patients with AML receiving AHCT. Compared to AML-HCT-CR score, the AML-DRG score allows better stratification and improved survival prediction of AML patients post-transplant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9643536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96435362022-11-15 Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Cao, Weijie Li, Xiaoning Zhang, Ran Bian, Zhilei Zhang, Suping Li, Li Xing, Haizhou Liu, Changfeng Xie, Xinsheng Jiang, Zhongxing Fang, Xiaosheng Wan, Dingming Yu, Jifeng Sci Rep Article We aimed to validate and prove the novel risk score models of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-specific disease risk group (AML-DRG) and AML-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-composite risk (AML-HCT-CR) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT). Among the 172 AML patients analysed, 48.3% (n = 83) were females. Median age was 31.5 years (range 14 to 62 years), two patients was more than 60 years old (1.2%). Median follow-up was 44 months (range 1 to 94 months). According to the AML-DRG model, 109, 49 and 14 patients were in low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. According to the AML-HCT-CR model, 108, 30, 20 and 14 patients were in low-, intermediate-, high- and very high-risk group, respectively. Our results showed that the AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models significantly predicted cumulative incidence of relapse (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). But AML-DRG model was not associated with NRM (p = 0.072). Univariate analysis showed that the AML-DRG model could better stratify AML patients into different risk groups compared to the AML-HCT-CR model. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognostic impact of AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models on post-transplant OS was independent to age, sex, conditioning type, transplant modality, and stem cell source (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR models can be used to effectively predict post-transplant survival in patients with AML receiving AHCT. Compared to AML-HCT-CR score, the AML-DRG score allows better stratification and improved survival prediction of AML patients post-transplant. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9643536/ /pubmed/36347881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20735-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Cao, Weijie Li, Xiaoning Zhang, Ran Bian, Zhilei Zhang, Suping Li, Li Xing, Haizhou Liu, Changfeng Xie, Xinsheng Jiang, Zhongxing Fang, Xiaosheng Wan, Dingming Yu, Jifeng Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title | Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_full | Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_fullStr | Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_short | Prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (AML-DRG and AML-HCT-CR) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
title_sort | prognostic prediction of novel risk scores (aml-drg and aml-hct-cr) in acute myeloid leukemia patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20735-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoweijie prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT lixiaoning prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT zhangran prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT bianzhilei prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT zhangsuping prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT lili prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT xinghaizhou prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT liuchangfeng prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT xiexinsheng prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT jiangzhongxing prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT fangxiaosheng prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT wandingming prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT yujifeng prognosticpredictionofnovelriskscoresamldrgandamlhctcrinacutemyeloidleukemiapatientswithallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation |