Cargando…
10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students
OBJECTIVES: The progress test (PT) is a comprehensive examination that is designed to match the knowledge acquisition necessary at graduation and monitors progress during the entire period of an undergraduate program. Qassim College of Medicine (QCM) began using the multi-institutional PT in the Kin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taibah University
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36398029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.07.008 |
_version_ | 1784826551044407296 |
---|---|
author | Alamro, Ahmad S. Alghasham, Abdullah A. Al-Shobaili, Hani A. Alhomaidan, Homaidan T. Salem, Tarek A. Wadi, Majed M. Saleh, Mohamed N. |
author_facet | Alamro, Ahmad S. Alghasham, Abdullah A. Al-Shobaili, Hani A. Alhomaidan, Homaidan T. Salem, Tarek A. Wadi, Majed M. Saleh, Mohamed N. |
author_sort | Alamro, Ahmad S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The progress test (PT) is a comprehensive examination that is designed to match the knowledge acquisition necessary at graduation and monitors progress during the entire period of an undergraduate program. Qassim College of Medicine (QCM) began using the multi-institutional PT in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This study aimed to determine if the PT can be utilized to assess the progress of medical students at different Saudi medical colleges with different educational approaches, as well as whether this testing modality could be accepted by other colleges. METHODS: Beside the establishment of a PT committee, comprehensive blueprinting was crafted to sample 200 A-type multiple choice questions (MCQs) from different disciplines. The PT is a paper-and-pencil model and is answered in a 4-h period. All PT items followed a uniform design. RESULTS: In total, 13 rounds of the progress test have been conducted. The number of participating colleges increased from three (with 285 students) in the first test (May 2012) to more than 20 (with >6000 students) in the ninth round (February 2017). The average % scores for first-year students ranged from 3.0% to 7.9% while the average scores for fifth-year students ranged from 34.0% to 43.0%. CONCLUSION: The conduction of this meticulously crafted test to evaluate knowledge achievement at medical graduation is a fruitful tool and helps to provide constructive feedback for test-takers and other stakeholders relating to their relative positions among other fellows at the national level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9643539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taibah University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96435392022-11-16 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students Alamro, Ahmad S. Alghasham, Abdullah A. Al-Shobaili, Hani A. Alhomaidan, Homaidan T. Salem, Tarek A. Wadi, Majed M. Saleh, Mohamed N. J Taibah Univ Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The progress test (PT) is a comprehensive examination that is designed to match the knowledge acquisition necessary at graduation and monitors progress during the entire period of an undergraduate program. Qassim College of Medicine (QCM) began using the multi-institutional PT in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This study aimed to determine if the PT can be utilized to assess the progress of medical students at different Saudi medical colleges with different educational approaches, as well as whether this testing modality could be accepted by other colleges. METHODS: Beside the establishment of a PT committee, comprehensive blueprinting was crafted to sample 200 A-type multiple choice questions (MCQs) from different disciplines. The PT is a paper-and-pencil model and is answered in a 4-h period. All PT items followed a uniform design. RESULTS: In total, 13 rounds of the progress test have been conducted. The number of participating colleges increased from three (with 285 students) in the first test (May 2012) to more than 20 (with >6000 students) in the ninth round (February 2017). The average % scores for first-year students ranged from 3.0% to 7.9% while the average scores for fifth-year students ranged from 34.0% to 43.0%. CONCLUSION: The conduction of this meticulously crafted test to evaluate knowledge achievement at medical graduation is a fruitful tool and helps to provide constructive feedback for test-takers and other stakeholders relating to their relative positions among other fellows at the national level. Taibah University 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9643539/ /pubmed/36398029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.07.008 Text en © 2022 [The Author/The Authors] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alamro, Ahmad S. Alghasham, Abdullah A. Al-Shobaili, Hani A. Alhomaidan, Homaidan T. Salem, Tarek A. Wadi, Majed M. Saleh, Mohamed N. 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students |
title | 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students |
title_full | 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students |
title_fullStr | 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students |
title_full_unstemmed | 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students |
title_short | 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students |
title_sort | 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for saudi medical students |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36398029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.07.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alamroahmads 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents AT alghashamabdullaha 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents AT alshobailihania 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents AT alhomaidanhomaidant 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents AT salemtareka 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents AT wadimajedm 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents AT salehmohamedn 10yearsofexperienceinadoptingimplementingandevaluatingprogresstestingforsaudimedicalstudents |