Cargando…

Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study

BACKGROUND: Uptake of risk-reducing surgery has increased among women at high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We sought to characterise familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes in a population-based study after accounting for gynaecological surgeries, including bilateral oophorectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnard, Mollie E, Meeks, Huong, Jarboe, Elke A, Albro, James, Camp, Nicola J, Doherty, Jennifer A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108402
_version_ 1784826567874052096
author Barnard, Mollie E
Meeks, Huong
Jarboe, Elke A
Albro, James
Camp, Nicola J
Doherty, Jennifer A
author_facet Barnard, Mollie E
Meeks, Huong
Jarboe, Elke A
Albro, James
Camp, Nicola J
Doherty, Jennifer A
author_sort Barnard, Mollie E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uptake of risk-reducing surgery has increased among women at high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We sought to characterise familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes in a population-based study after accounting for gynaecological surgeries, including bilateral oophorectomy. METHODS: We compared risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in relatives of 3536 epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 1966–2016 and relatives of 35 326 matched controls. We used Cox competing risk models, incorporating bilateral oophorectomy as a competing risk, to estimate the relative risk of ovarian cancer in first-degree (FDR), second-degree (SDR) and third-degree (TDR) relatives from 1966 to 2016. We also estimated relative risks in time periods before (1966–1994, 1995–2004) and after (2005–2016) formal recommendations were made for prophylactic oophorectomy among women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. RESULTS: The relative risks of epithelial ovarian cancer in FDRs, SDRs and TDRs of cases versus controls were 1.68 (95% CI 1.39 to 2.04), 1.51 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.75) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.48), respectively. Relative risks were greatest for high-grade serous, mucinous and ‘other epithelial’ histotypes. Relative risks were attenuated for case FDRs, but not for SDRs or TDRs, from 2005 onwards, consistent with the timing of recommendations for prophylactic surgery. CONCLUSION: Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer extends to TDRs, especially for high-grade serous and mucinous histotypes. Distant relatives share genes but minimal environment, highlighting the importance of germline inherited genetics in ovarian cancer aetiology. Increased ovarian cancer risk in distant relatives has implications for counselling and recommendations for prophylactic surgeries that, from our data, appear only to reach FDRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96436672023-02-01 Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study Barnard, Mollie E Meeks, Huong Jarboe, Elke A Albro, James Camp, Nicola J Doherty, Jennifer A J Med Genet Cancer Genetics BACKGROUND: Uptake of risk-reducing surgery has increased among women at high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We sought to characterise familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes in a population-based study after accounting for gynaecological surgeries, including bilateral oophorectomy. METHODS: We compared risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in relatives of 3536 epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 1966–2016 and relatives of 35 326 matched controls. We used Cox competing risk models, incorporating bilateral oophorectomy as a competing risk, to estimate the relative risk of ovarian cancer in first-degree (FDR), second-degree (SDR) and third-degree (TDR) relatives from 1966 to 2016. We also estimated relative risks in time periods before (1966–1994, 1995–2004) and after (2005–2016) formal recommendations were made for prophylactic oophorectomy among women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. RESULTS: The relative risks of epithelial ovarian cancer in FDRs, SDRs and TDRs of cases versus controls were 1.68 (95% CI 1.39 to 2.04), 1.51 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.75) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.48), respectively. Relative risks were greatest for high-grade serous, mucinous and ‘other epithelial’ histotypes. Relative risks were attenuated for case FDRs, but not for SDRs or TDRs, from 2005 onwards, consistent with the timing of recommendations for prophylactic surgery. CONCLUSION: Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer extends to TDRs, especially for high-grade serous and mucinous histotypes. Distant relatives share genes but minimal environment, highlighting the importance of germline inherited genetics in ovarian cancer aetiology. Increased ovarian cancer risk in distant relatives has implications for counselling and recommendations for prophylactic surgeries that, from our data, appear only to reach FDRs. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9643667/ /pubmed/35534206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108402 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cancer Genetics
Barnard, Mollie E
Meeks, Huong
Jarboe, Elke A
Albro, James
Camp, Nicola J
Doherty, Jennifer A
Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
title Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
title_full Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
title_fullStr Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
title_short Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
title_sort familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study
topic Cancer Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108402
work_keys_str_mv AT barnardmolliee familialriskofepithelialovariancancerafteraccountingforgynaecologicalsurgeryapopulationbasedstudy
AT meekshuong familialriskofepithelialovariancancerafteraccountingforgynaecologicalsurgeryapopulationbasedstudy
AT jarboeelkea familialriskofepithelialovariancancerafteraccountingforgynaecologicalsurgeryapopulationbasedstudy
AT albrojames familialriskofepithelialovariancancerafteraccountingforgynaecologicalsurgeryapopulationbasedstudy
AT campnicolaj familialriskofepithelialovariancancerafteraccountingforgynaecologicalsurgeryapopulationbasedstudy
AT dohertyjennifera familialriskofepithelialovariancancerafteraccountingforgynaecologicalsurgeryapopulationbasedstudy