Cargando…

How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is common after radical prostatectomy, but effective treatment options for men with BCR after curative treatment remain controversial. Although prostate-specific antigen is widely used as a surrogate marker for prostate cancer survival, it cannot fully differentiate betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Won Tae, Kim, Jiyeon, Kim, Wun-Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347548
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20220294
_version_ 1784826579830964224
author Kim, Won Tae
Kim, Jiyeon
Kim, Wun-Jae
author_facet Kim, Won Tae
Kim, Jiyeon
Kim, Wun-Jae
author_sort Kim, Won Tae
collection PubMed
description Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is common after radical prostatectomy, but effective treatment options for men with BCR after curative treatment remain controversial. Although prostate-specific antigen is widely used as a surrogate marker for prostate cancer survival, it cannot fully differentiate between prostate-cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Thus, it is challenging for physicians to determine the timing of treatment to halt or slow the clinical progression of disease in patients with BCR while avoiding overtreatment for patients whose disease may not progress beyond BCR. Adjuvant therapy for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy in intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer has a benefit in terms of disease progression and survival but is not recommended in low-risk prostate cancer because of the significant adverse effects related to radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is also recommended for patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy. Several options for management of BCR after radical prostatectomy include SRT to the prostatic bed and/or pelvis, continuous or intermittent ADT, or observation. Patients’ comorbidity, preferences, and cancer-related factors must be considered when deciding the best management strategy. Modern imaging technology such as positron emission tomography imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive regions enables earlier detection of disease progression, thus enhancing decision making for future disease management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96437242022-11-18 How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy? Kim, Won Tae Kim, Jiyeon Kim, Wun-Jae Investig Clin Urol Review Article Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is common after radical prostatectomy, but effective treatment options for men with BCR after curative treatment remain controversial. Although prostate-specific antigen is widely used as a surrogate marker for prostate cancer survival, it cannot fully differentiate between prostate-cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Thus, it is challenging for physicians to determine the timing of treatment to halt or slow the clinical progression of disease in patients with BCR while avoiding overtreatment for patients whose disease may not progress beyond BCR. Adjuvant therapy for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy in intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer has a benefit in terms of disease progression and survival but is not recommended in low-risk prostate cancer because of the significant adverse effects related to radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is also recommended for patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy. Several options for management of BCR after radical prostatectomy include SRT to the prostatic bed and/or pelvis, continuous or intermittent ADT, or observation. Patients’ comorbidity, preferences, and cancer-related factors must be considered when deciding the best management strategy. Modern imaging technology such as positron emission tomography imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive regions enables earlier detection of disease progression, thus enhancing decision making for future disease management. The Korean Urological Association 2022-11 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9643724/ /pubmed/36347548 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20220294 Text en © The Korean Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kim, Won Tae
Kim, Jiyeon
Kim, Wun-Jae
How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
title How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
title_full How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
title_fullStr How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
title_full_unstemmed How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
title_short How can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
title_sort how can we best manage biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347548
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20220294
work_keys_str_mv AT kimwontae howcanwebestmanagebiochemicalfailureafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kimjiyeon howcanwebestmanagebiochemicalfailureafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kimwunjae howcanwebestmanagebiochemicalfailureafterradicalprostatectomy