Practice of Health Care Governance among South Wollo Department Heads and Managers of Public Health Institutions, Northeast Ethiopia

OBJECTIVE: Governance in health care generally means strengthening leadership and governance functions, improving systems, and having both central and local governments jointly take responsibility for overall health system performance. More than half of the world’s population has expressed distrust of state institutions including the health sector. Ethiopia, like other African countries, faces many challenges in the process of good governance building. The aim of this study was to assess the practices health care governance in the South Wollo Zone health sectors, Northeast Ethiopia. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted in the South Wollo from 15 May to 15 June 2021. A simple random sampling technique was used, and the data were collected using a structured survey. The data were entered into Epi data version 4.6 for cleaning and exported to SPSS v.25 for further analysis. We performed binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors of governance practices. Variables with p values less than 0.05 during multivariable logistic regression analysis were declared statistically significant. RESULTS: A 96.75% (387) of the study participants completed the study questionnaires. Out of these, 37.98% (95% confidence interval: 33.1%, 42.9%) have been found practicing good governance in the health sector. Having had training (adjusted odds ratio = 7.92, 95% confidence interval: 4.04, 15.51), having job descriptions (adjusted odds ratio = 2.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 4.09), opportunity to share with peers (adjusted odds ratio = 6.64, 95% confidence interval: 3.02, 14.62), political interference (adjusted odds ratio = 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.22, 0.71), and age < 25 years (adjusted odds ratio = 0.13, 95% confidence interval: 0.02, 0.77) were found to have a statistically significant association with the governance practice of managers. CONCLUSION: The overall practice of governance was found poor in light of the national and World Health Organization standards for health sector Governance. Having had training, having job descriptions and the opportunity to share with peers significantly increased the odds of good governance while political interference and young age significantly decreased the odds of good governance. Managers could implement training, write job descriptions, and encourage sharing with peers to improve governance.