Cargando…

Preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants at Debre Markos town public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study design 2021

OBJECTIVE: To assess the preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants in Debre Markos town public health facilities, northwest Ethiopia, 2021. METHOD: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 8 January 2021 to 28 February 2021 at Debre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negash Dechasa, Abraham, Mulaw Endale, Zerfu, Sertsu Gerbi, Addisu, Bekele Sime, Habtamu, Ayanaw Kassie, Belayneh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36385788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121221135024
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants in Debre Markos town public health facilities, northwest Ethiopia, 2021. METHOD: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 8 January 2021 to 28 February 2021 at Debre Markos town public health facilities. A total of 662 study participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Pretested interviewer-administered structured questionnaires were used for data collection. Data were entered using Epi Data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were applied to identify factors associated with birth attendant gender preference. Association was described by the “odd ratio” along with a 95% confidence interval. Finally, a P value < 0.05 in the adjusted analysis was used to declare a significant association. RESULT: In this study, 644 women participated making a response rate of 97.3%. Of the total study participants, 108 (16.8%; 95% confidence interval: 13.8–19.4) preferred male birth attendants, while 232 (36%; 95% confidence interval: 32.5–39.8) preferred female birth attendants. Age (15–24) (adjusted odds ratio = 4.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.79, 12.94), no formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.32, 6.52), and primary education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 5.47) were significantly associated with female birth attendant preference. A lack of formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.68), secondary education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.71), and history of assisted vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio = 3.72; 95% confidence interval: 1.40, 9.87) were significantly associated with a male birth attendant preference. CONCLUSION: A female birth attendant is preferred by almost one-third of pregnant mothers, while one-sixth preferred a male. The clients who were younger in age and lower in educational status were more likely to prefer female birth attendants, whereas those who had a history of assisted vaginal delivery were more likely to prefer male birth attendants. To have a mother in the continuum of care, it is crucial to take her preferences into account when providing services.