Cargando…

Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms

Low-code software development (LCSD) is an emerging approach to democratize application development for software practitioners from diverse backgrounds. LCSD platforms promote rapid application development with a drag-and-drop interface and minimal programming by hand. As it is a relatively new para...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alamin, Md Abdullah Al, Uddin, Gias, Malakar, Sanjay, Afroz, Sadia, Haider, Tameem, Iqbal, Anindya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10244-0
_version_ 1784826625600258048
author Alamin, Md Abdullah Al
Uddin, Gias
Malakar, Sanjay
Afroz, Sadia
Haider, Tameem
Iqbal, Anindya
author_facet Alamin, Md Abdullah Al
Uddin, Gias
Malakar, Sanjay
Afroz, Sadia
Haider, Tameem
Iqbal, Anindya
author_sort Alamin, Md Abdullah Al
collection PubMed
description Low-code software development (LCSD) is an emerging approach to democratize application development for software practitioners from diverse backgrounds. LCSD platforms promote rapid application development with a drag-and-drop interface and minimal programming by hand. As it is a relatively new paradigm, it is vital to study developers’ difficulties when adopting LCSD platforms. Software engineers frequently use the online developer forum Stack Overflow (SO) to seek assistance with technical issues. We observe a growing body of LCSD-related posts in SO. This paper presents an empirical study of around 33K SO posts (questions + accepted answers) containing discussions of 38 popular LCSD platforms. We use Topic Modeling to determine the topics discussed in those posts. Additionally, we examine how these topics are spread across the various phases of the agile software development life cycle (SDLC) and which part of LCSD is the most popular and challenging. Our study offers several interesting findings. First, we find 40 LCSD topics that we group into five categories: Application Customization, Database and File Management, Platform Adoption, Platform Maintenance, and Third-party API Integration. Second, while the Application Customization (30%) and Data Storage (25%) topic categories are the most common, inquiries relating to several other categories (e.g., the Platform Adoption topic category) have gained considerable attention in recent years. Third, all topic categories are evolving rapidly, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Fourth, the How-type questions are prevalent in all topics, but the What-type and Why-type (i.e., detail information for clarification) questions are more prevalent in the Platform Adoption and Platform Maintenance category. Fifth, LCSD practitioners find topics related to Platform Query the most popular, while topics related to Message Queue and Library Dependency Management as the most difficult to get accepted answers to. Sixth, the Why-type and What-type questions and Agile Maintenance and Deployment phase are the most challenging among practitioners. The findings of this study have implications for all three LCSD stakeholders: LCSD platform vendors, LCSD developers/practitioners, Researchers, and Educators. Researchers and LCSD platform vendors can collaborate to improve different aspects of LCSD, such as better tutorial-based documentation, testing, and DevOps support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96439112022-11-14 Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms Alamin, Md Abdullah Al Uddin, Gias Malakar, Sanjay Afroz, Sadia Haider, Tameem Iqbal, Anindya Empir Softw Eng Article Low-code software development (LCSD) is an emerging approach to democratize application development for software practitioners from diverse backgrounds. LCSD platforms promote rapid application development with a drag-and-drop interface and minimal programming by hand. As it is a relatively new paradigm, it is vital to study developers’ difficulties when adopting LCSD platforms. Software engineers frequently use the online developer forum Stack Overflow (SO) to seek assistance with technical issues. We observe a growing body of LCSD-related posts in SO. This paper presents an empirical study of around 33K SO posts (questions + accepted answers) containing discussions of 38 popular LCSD platforms. We use Topic Modeling to determine the topics discussed in those posts. Additionally, we examine how these topics are spread across the various phases of the agile software development life cycle (SDLC) and which part of LCSD is the most popular and challenging. Our study offers several interesting findings. First, we find 40 LCSD topics that we group into five categories: Application Customization, Database and File Management, Platform Adoption, Platform Maintenance, and Third-party API Integration. Second, while the Application Customization (30%) and Data Storage (25%) topic categories are the most common, inquiries relating to several other categories (e.g., the Platform Adoption topic category) have gained considerable attention in recent years. Third, all topic categories are evolving rapidly, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Fourth, the How-type questions are prevalent in all topics, but the What-type and Why-type (i.e., detail information for clarification) questions are more prevalent in the Platform Adoption and Platform Maintenance category. Fifth, LCSD practitioners find topics related to Platform Query the most popular, while topics related to Message Queue and Library Dependency Management as the most difficult to get accepted answers to. Sixth, the Why-type and What-type questions and Agile Maintenance and Deployment phase are the most challenging among practitioners. The findings of this study have implications for all three LCSD stakeholders: LCSD platform vendors, LCSD developers/practitioners, Researchers, and Educators. Researchers and LCSD platform vendors can collaborate to improve different aspects of LCSD, such as better tutorial-based documentation, testing, and DevOps support. Springer US 2022-11-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9643911/ /pubmed/36407813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10244-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Alamin, Md Abdullah Al
Uddin, Gias
Malakar, Sanjay
Afroz, Sadia
Haider, Tameem
Iqbal, Anindya
Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
title Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
title_full Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
title_fullStr Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
title_full_unstemmed Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
title_short Developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
title_sort developer discussion topics on the adoption and barriers of low code software development platforms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10244-0
work_keys_str_mv AT alaminmdabdullahal developerdiscussiontopicsontheadoptionandbarriersoflowcodesoftwaredevelopmentplatforms
AT uddingias developerdiscussiontopicsontheadoptionandbarriersoflowcodesoftwaredevelopmentplatforms
AT malakarsanjay developerdiscussiontopicsontheadoptionandbarriersoflowcodesoftwaredevelopmentplatforms
AT afrozsadia developerdiscussiontopicsontheadoptionandbarriersoflowcodesoftwaredevelopmentplatforms
AT haidertameem developerdiscussiontopicsontheadoptionandbarriersoflowcodesoftwaredevelopmentplatforms
AT iqbalanindya developerdiscussiontopicsontheadoptionandbarriersoflowcodesoftwaredevelopmentplatforms