Cargando…
Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing
Despite continued attention, finding adequate criteria for distinguishing “good” from “bad” scholarly journals remains an elusive goal. In this essay, I propose a solution informed by the work of Imre Lakatos and his methodology of scientific research programmes (MSRP). I begin by reviewing several...
Autor principal: | Dunleavy, Daniel J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13194-022-00492-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A longitudinal study of independent scholar-published open access journals
por: Björk, Bo-Christer, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Currie’s “Journal”
por: Osler, William
Publicado: (1919) -
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CELL AND ITS VITAL PROCESSES
por: Flemming, Walther
Publicado: (1965) -
Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal: A Time of Transition
por: McDade, Joseph E., et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2014)