Cargando…

Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis

BACKGROUND: Our aims were to examine themes of the most difficult or distressing events reported by healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in two US health care systems in order to identify common themes and then to relate them to both behavioral theory and measures of anxiety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burstyn, Igor, Holt, Karyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01075-x
_version_ 1784826648164564992
author Burstyn, Igor
Holt, Karyn
author_facet Burstyn, Igor
Holt, Karyn
author_sort Burstyn, Igor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aims were to examine themes of the most difficult or distressing events reported by healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in two US health care systems in order to identify common themes and then to relate them to both behavioral theory and measures of anxiety and depression. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of nurses and physicians during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. An emailed recruitment letter was sent, with about half choosing to supply open-ended responses relevant to thematic analysis. We measured symptoms of anxiety and depression separately, captured demographics, and asked two open-ended questions regarding events that were the most difficult or stressful, and reinforced pride. We reported descriptive statistics and coded thematic categories for their continuum “pride” and “distress” the factors related to fostering well-being according to the Self-Determination Theory. RESULTS: Themes that emerged from these narratives were congruent with prediction of Self-Determination theory that autonomy-supportive experiences will foster pride, while autonomy-thwarting experiences will cause distress. Those who reported distressful events were more anxious and depressed compared to those who did not. Among those who reported incidences that reinforced pride in the profession, depression was rarer compared to those who did not. These trends were evident after allowing for medical history and other covariates in logistic regressions. CONCLUSION: Causal claims from our analysis should be made with caution due to the cross-sectional research design. Understanding perceptions of the pandemic by nurses and physicians may help identify and manage sources of distress, and suggest means of mitigating the risk of mental health distress through autonomy-supportive policies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-01075-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9643994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96439942022-11-14 Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis Burstyn, Igor Holt, Karyn BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Our aims were to examine themes of the most difficult or distressing events reported by healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in two US health care systems in order to identify common themes and then to relate them to both behavioral theory and measures of anxiety and depression. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of nurses and physicians during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. An emailed recruitment letter was sent, with about half choosing to supply open-ended responses relevant to thematic analysis. We measured symptoms of anxiety and depression separately, captured demographics, and asked two open-ended questions regarding events that were the most difficult or stressful, and reinforced pride. We reported descriptive statistics and coded thematic categories for their continuum “pride” and “distress” the factors related to fostering well-being according to the Self-Determination Theory. RESULTS: Themes that emerged from these narratives were congruent with prediction of Self-Determination theory that autonomy-supportive experiences will foster pride, while autonomy-thwarting experiences will cause distress. Those who reported distressful events were more anxious and depressed compared to those who did not. Among those who reported incidences that reinforced pride in the profession, depression was rarer compared to those who did not. These trends were evident after allowing for medical history and other covariates in logistic regressions. CONCLUSION: Causal claims from our analysis should be made with caution due to the cross-sectional research design. Understanding perceptions of the pandemic by nurses and physicians may help identify and manage sources of distress, and suggest means of mitigating the risk of mental health distress through autonomy-supportive policies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-01075-x. BioMed Central 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9643994/ /pubmed/36348425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01075-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Burstyn, Igor
Holt, Karyn
Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
title Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
title_full Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
title_fullStr Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
title_short Pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two US healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
title_sort pride and adversity among nurses and physicians during the pandemic in two us healthcare systems: a mixed methods analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01075-x
work_keys_str_mv AT burstynigor prideandadversityamongnursesandphysiciansduringthepandemicintwoushealthcaresystemsamixedmethodsanalysis
AT holtkaryn prideandadversityamongnursesandphysiciansduringthepandemicintwoushealthcaresystemsamixedmethodsanalysis