Cargando…
Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity
STUDY OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to summarize instruments that measure one or more domains of sleep health (i.e. duration, quality, efficiency, timing, daytime sleepiness and sleep-related behaviors) in a general population of 4–12-year old children, and to assess these instruments’ content valid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36087112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsac215 |
_version_ | 1784826676196147200 |
---|---|
author | Inhulsen, Maj-Britt M R van Stralen, Maartje M Terwee, Caroline B Ujcic-Voortman, Joanne K Seidell, Jacob C Busch, Vincent |
author_facet | Inhulsen, Maj-Britt M R van Stralen, Maartje M Terwee, Caroline B Ujcic-Voortman, Joanne K Seidell, Jacob C Busch, Vincent |
author_sort | Inhulsen, Maj-Britt M R |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to summarize instruments that measure one or more domains of sleep health (i.e. duration, quality, efficiency, timing, daytime sleepiness and sleep-related behaviors) in a general population of 4–12-year old children, and to assess these instruments’ content validity. Other measurement properties were evaluated for instruments with indications of sufficient content validity. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and EmBase. Methodological quality, content validity, and other measurement properties were assessed via the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Instruments with indications of sufficient content validity (i.e. relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility) were further evaluated on other measurement properties (i.e. other aspects of validity, reliability, responsiveness). A modified GRADE approach was applied to determine the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty instruments, containing 36 subscales, were included. None of the instruments measured all sleep health domains. For five (subscales of) instruments sufficient relevance and comprehensibility was found. The quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. For these five instruments all additional measurement properties were assessed. Sufficient results were found for structural validity (n = 1), internal consistency (n = 1), and construct validity (n = 1), with quality of evidence ranging from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS: Several (subscales of) instruments measuring domains of child sleep health showed good promise, demonstrating sufficient relevance, comprehensibility, and some also sufficient results on other measurement properties. However, more high quality studies on instrument development and the evaluation of measurement properties are required. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021224109 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9644118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96441182022-11-14 Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity Inhulsen, Maj-Britt M R van Stralen, Maartje M Terwee, Caroline B Ujcic-Voortman, Joanne K Seidell, Jacob C Busch, Vincent Sleep Sleep, Health, and Disease STUDY OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to summarize instruments that measure one or more domains of sleep health (i.e. duration, quality, efficiency, timing, daytime sleepiness and sleep-related behaviors) in a general population of 4–12-year old children, and to assess these instruments’ content validity. Other measurement properties were evaluated for instruments with indications of sufficient content validity. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and EmBase. Methodological quality, content validity, and other measurement properties were assessed via the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Instruments with indications of sufficient content validity (i.e. relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility) were further evaluated on other measurement properties (i.e. other aspects of validity, reliability, responsiveness). A modified GRADE approach was applied to determine the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty instruments, containing 36 subscales, were included. None of the instruments measured all sleep health domains. For five (subscales of) instruments sufficient relevance and comprehensibility was found. The quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. For these five instruments all additional measurement properties were assessed. Sufficient results were found for structural validity (n = 1), internal consistency (n = 1), and construct validity (n = 1), with quality of evidence ranging from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS: Several (subscales of) instruments measuring domains of child sleep health showed good promise, demonstrating sufficient relevance, comprehensibility, and some also sufficient results on other measurement properties. However, more high quality studies on instrument development and the evaluation of measurement properties are required. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021224109 Oxford University Press 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9644118/ /pubmed/36087112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsac215 Text en © Sleep Research Society 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sleep, Health, and Disease Inhulsen, Maj-Britt M R van Stralen, Maartje M Terwee, Caroline B Ujcic-Voortman, Joanne K Seidell, Jacob C Busch, Vincent Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
title | Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
title_full | Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
title_fullStr | Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
title_short | Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
title_sort | measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: a systematic review of instruments and their content validity |
topic | Sleep, Health, and Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36087112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsac215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inhulsenmajbrittmr measuringsleephealthinprimaryschoolagedchildrenasystematicreviewofinstrumentsandtheircontentvalidity AT vanstralenmaartjem measuringsleephealthinprimaryschoolagedchildrenasystematicreviewofinstrumentsandtheircontentvalidity AT terweecarolineb measuringsleephealthinprimaryschoolagedchildrenasystematicreviewofinstrumentsandtheircontentvalidity AT ujcicvoortmanjoannek measuringsleephealthinprimaryschoolagedchildrenasystematicreviewofinstrumentsandtheircontentvalidity AT seidelljacobc measuringsleephealthinprimaryschoolagedchildrenasystematicreviewofinstrumentsandtheircontentvalidity AT buschvincent measuringsleephealthinprimaryschoolagedchildrenasystematicreviewofinstrumentsandtheircontentvalidity |