Cargando…

Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis

OBJECTIVE: To explore patients’ with asplenia and general practitioners’ (GPs) (1) perceptions of a novel, Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-based, educational intervention which targets to increase adherence to post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS) prevention measures and (2) their experience in implem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anka, Natascha, Glattacker, Manuela, Farin-Glattacker, Erik, Camp, Johannes, Rieg, Siegbert, Bayrhuber, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060492
_version_ 1784826713109168128
author Anka, Natascha
Glattacker, Manuela
Farin-Glattacker, Erik
Camp, Johannes
Rieg, Siegbert
Bayrhuber, Marianne
author_facet Anka, Natascha
Glattacker, Manuela
Farin-Glattacker, Erik
Camp, Johannes
Rieg, Siegbert
Bayrhuber, Marianne
author_sort Anka, Natascha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore patients’ with asplenia and general practitioners’ (GPs) (1) perceptions of a novel, Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-based, educational intervention which targets to increase adherence to post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS) prevention measures and (2) their experience in implementing prevention measures following this intervention. DESIGN: A process evaluation conducted on average 3.5 (for patients) and 3.8 (for GPs) months after the intervention between January 2020 and April 2021 individually by means of semi-structured guideline-based telephone interviews. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer subsample of N=25 patients with asplenia and N=8 GPs who received the intervention. Inclusion criteria were met by prior participation in the intervention (German-speaking, of full age and insured by the cooperating health insurance). Patient selection was done by purposeful selection aiming at maximum variability in terms of adherence to preventative measures prior to intervention participation. Participating GPs are a non-purposeful selected convenience sample. For reasons of data protection, no personal data was collected. RESULTS: The intervention was positively evaluated and its personal relevancy for patients and for the GPs’ professional work became apparent. The intervention promoted risk awareness, intention to action, action planning and subsequently, improved adherence to preventative measures. Helpful factors for implementation among the patients were social support by relatives and GPs. Barriers to adherence identified in both groups can be divided into patient-attributed (eg, comorbidities), doctor-related (eg, lack of knowledge or support) as well as contextual factors (eg, vaccine supply constraints). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a patient and GP perceived benefit of the intervention, but still identify prevailing barriers to implementation. In a further step, a quantitative evaluation of the intervention will be conducted and recommendations for integrating the intervention in usual care will be made. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00015238.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9644314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96443142022-11-15 Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis Anka, Natascha Glattacker, Manuela Farin-Glattacker, Erik Camp, Johannes Rieg, Siegbert Bayrhuber, Marianne BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVE: To explore patients’ with asplenia and general practitioners’ (GPs) (1) perceptions of a novel, Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-based, educational intervention which targets to increase adherence to post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS) prevention measures and (2) their experience in implementing prevention measures following this intervention. DESIGN: A process evaluation conducted on average 3.5 (for patients) and 3.8 (for GPs) months after the intervention between January 2020 and April 2021 individually by means of semi-structured guideline-based telephone interviews. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer subsample of N=25 patients with asplenia and N=8 GPs who received the intervention. Inclusion criteria were met by prior participation in the intervention (German-speaking, of full age and insured by the cooperating health insurance). Patient selection was done by purposeful selection aiming at maximum variability in terms of adherence to preventative measures prior to intervention participation. Participating GPs are a non-purposeful selected convenience sample. For reasons of data protection, no personal data was collected. RESULTS: The intervention was positively evaluated and its personal relevancy for patients and for the GPs’ professional work became apparent. The intervention promoted risk awareness, intention to action, action planning and subsequently, improved adherence to preventative measures. Helpful factors for implementation among the patients were social support by relatives and GPs. Barriers to adherence identified in both groups can be divided into patient-attributed (eg, comorbidities), doctor-related (eg, lack of knowledge or support) as well as contextual factors (eg, vaccine supply constraints). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a patient and GP perceived benefit of the intervention, but still identify prevailing barriers to implementation. In a further step, a quantitative evaluation of the intervention will be conducted and recommendations for integrating the intervention in usual care will be made. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00015238. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9644314/ /pubmed/36351729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060492 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Anka, Natascha
Glattacker, Manuela
Farin-Glattacker, Erik
Camp, Johannes
Rieg, Siegbert
Bayrhuber, Marianne
Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
title Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
title_full Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
title_short Patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
title_sort patients’ with asplenia and doctors’ experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060492
work_keys_str_mv AT ankanatascha patientswithaspleniaanddoctorsexperiencesinimplementingpreventativemeasuresfollowinganoveleducationalinterventionaqualitativeanalysis
AT glattackermanuela patientswithaspleniaanddoctorsexperiencesinimplementingpreventativemeasuresfollowinganoveleducationalinterventionaqualitativeanalysis
AT faringlattackererik patientswithaspleniaanddoctorsexperiencesinimplementingpreventativemeasuresfollowinganoveleducationalinterventionaqualitativeanalysis
AT campjohannes patientswithaspleniaanddoctorsexperiencesinimplementingpreventativemeasuresfollowinganoveleducationalinterventionaqualitativeanalysis
AT riegsiegbert patientswithaspleniaanddoctorsexperiencesinimplementingpreventativemeasuresfollowinganoveleducationalinterventionaqualitativeanalysis
AT bayrhubermarianne patientswithaspleniaanddoctorsexperiencesinimplementingpreventativemeasuresfollowinganoveleducationalinterventionaqualitativeanalysis