Cargando…
Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial
INTRODUCTION: Supplemental oxygen is commonly used in trauma patients, although it may lead to hyperoxaemia that has been associated with pulmonary complications and increased mortality. The primary objective of this trial, TRAUMOX2, is to compare a restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategy the fir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064047 |
_version_ | 1784826718705418240 |
---|---|
author | Baekgaard, Josefine Arleth, Tobias Siersma, Volkert Hinkelbein, Jochen Yücetepe, Sirin Klimek, Markus van Vledder, Mark G Van Lieshout, Esther M M Mikkelsen, Søren Zwisler, Stine Thorhauge Andersen, Mikkel Fenger-Eriksen, Christian Isbye, Dan L Rasmussen, Lars S Steinmetz, Jacob |
author_facet | Baekgaard, Josefine Arleth, Tobias Siersma, Volkert Hinkelbein, Jochen Yücetepe, Sirin Klimek, Markus van Vledder, Mark G Van Lieshout, Esther M M Mikkelsen, Søren Zwisler, Stine Thorhauge Andersen, Mikkel Fenger-Eriksen, Christian Isbye, Dan L Rasmussen, Lars S Steinmetz, Jacob |
author_sort | Baekgaard, Josefine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Supplemental oxygen is commonly used in trauma patients, although it may lead to hyperoxaemia that has been associated with pulmonary complications and increased mortality. The primary objective of this trial, TRAUMOX2, is to compare a restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategy the first 8 hours following trauma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TRAUMOX2 is an investigator-initiated, international, parallel-grouped, superiority, outcome assessor-blinded and analyst-blinded, randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Adult patients with suspected major trauma are randomised to eight hours of a restrictive or liberal oxygen strategy. The restrictive group receives the lowest dosage of oxygen (>21%) that ensures an SpO(2) of 94%. The liberal group receives 12–15 L O(2)/min or FiO(2)=0.6–1.0. The primary outcome is a composite of 30-day mortality and/or development of major respiratory complications (pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome). With 710 participants in each arm, we will be able to detect a 33% risk reduction with a restrictive oxygen strategy if the incidence of our primary outcome is 15% in the liberal group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: TRAUMOX2 is carried out in accordance with the Helsinki II Declaration. It has been approved by the Danish Committee on Health Research Ethics for the Capital Region (H-21018062) and The Danish Medicines Agency, as well as the Dutch Medical Research Ethics Committee Erasmus MS (NL79921.078.21 and MEC-2021-0932). A website (www.traumox2.org) is available for updates and study results will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2021-000556-19; NCT05146700. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9644337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96443372022-11-15 Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial Baekgaard, Josefine Arleth, Tobias Siersma, Volkert Hinkelbein, Jochen Yücetepe, Sirin Klimek, Markus van Vledder, Mark G Van Lieshout, Esther M M Mikkelsen, Søren Zwisler, Stine Thorhauge Andersen, Mikkel Fenger-Eriksen, Christian Isbye, Dan L Rasmussen, Lars S Steinmetz, Jacob BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Supplemental oxygen is commonly used in trauma patients, although it may lead to hyperoxaemia that has been associated with pulmonary complications and increased mortality. The primary objective of this trial, TRAUMOX2, is to compare a restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategy the first 8 hours following trauma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TRAUMOX2 is an investigator-initiated, international, parallel-grouped, superiority, outcome assessor-blinded and analyst-blinded, randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Adult patients with suspected major trauma are randomised to eight hours of a restrictive or liberal oxygen strategy. The restrictive group receives the lowest dosage of oxygen (>21%) that ensures an SpO(2) of 94%. The liberal group receives 12–15 L O(2)/min or FiO(2)=0.6–1.0. The primary outcome is a composite of 30-day mortality and/or development of major respiratory complications (pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome). With 710 participants in each arm, we will be able to detect a 33% risk reduction with a restrictive oxygen strategy if the incidence of our primary outcome is 15% in the liberal group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: TRAUMOX2 is carried out in accordance with the Helsinki II Declaration. It has been approved by the Danish Committee on Health Research Ethics for the Capital Region (H-21018062) and The Danish Medicines Agency, as well as the Dutch Medical Research Ethics Committee Erasmus MS (NL79921.078.21 and MEC-2021-0932). A website (www.traumox2.org) is available for updates and study results will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2021-000556-19; NCT05146700. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9644337/ /pubmed/36344005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064047 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesia Baekgaard, Josefine Arleth, Tobias Siersma, Volkert Hinkelbein, Jochen Yücetepe, Sirin Klimek, Markus van Vledder, Mark G Van Lieshout, Esther M M Mikkelsen, Søren Zwisler, Stine Thorhauge Andersen, Mikkel Fenger-Eriksen, Christian Isbye, Dan L Rasmussen, Lars S Steinmetz, Jacob Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title | Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the TRAUMOX2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen strategies for trauma patients — the traumox2 trial: protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Anaesthesia |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baekgaardjosefine comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT arlethtobias comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT siersmavolkert comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT hinkelbeinjochen comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT yucetepesirin comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT klimekmarkus comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT vanvleddermarkg comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT vanlieshoutesthermm comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT mikkelsensøren comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT zwislerstinethorhauge comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT andersenmikkel comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT fengereriksenchristian comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT isbyedanl comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT rasmussenlarss comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT steinmetzjacob comparingrestrictiveversusliberaloxygenstrategiesfortraumapatientsthetraumox2trialprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial |