Cargando…

Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT

OBJECTIVES: Interest in less than full-time training (LTFT) is growing among doctors in training. LTFT applications have previously been limited to fulfilment of specific criteria such as childcare or health reasons, but Health Education for England (HEE) has recently completed a pilot into LTFT for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cathcart, Jennifer, Mayne, Kaitlin J, Hull, Richard, Jones, Michael, Miller, Alastair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064518
_version_ 1784826723152429056
author Cathcart, Jennifer
Mayne, Kaitlin J
Hull, Richard
Jones, Michael
Miller, Alastair
author_facet Cathcart, Jennifer
Mayne, Kaitlin J
Hull, Richard
Jones, Michael
Miller, Alastair
author_sort Cathcart, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Interest in less than full-time training (LTFT) is growing among doctors in training. LTFT applications have previously been limited to fulfilment of specific criteria such as childcare or health reasons, but Health Education for England (HEE) has recently completed a pilot into LTFT for a third category: lifestyle choice. This was recognised as an opportunity to canvas trainee perspectives and intentions on LTFT and implications for workforce planning. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of UK trainees via an online questionnaire. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The survey was distributed via email to trainees in all specialities and stages of training across the UK. The survey focused on three key themes: experiences of current LTFT trainees, perspectives of trainees considering LTFT in the future and experience of working with LTFT colleagues. RESULTS: Responses were received from 783 trainees across the UK, with most responses received from physician trainees (76%). Current LTFT trainees represented one-third of respondents. Of those not currently working LTFT, 75% expressed an intention to do so in future with lifestyle being the most common reason. Almost half of this group were concerned about the impact on their training. Stigma, reduced training opportunities, prolonged training and the application process were commonly cited barriers. These difficulties were experienced by several current LTFT trainees, 32% of whom described a negative impact on their training. Almost two-thirds (62%) of respondents stated they wish to work LTFT as a consultant. CONCLUSION: Systems must adapt to increase access to LTFT training to promote trainee well-being and retention. Progress is being made and we suggest HEE’s category three pilot be rolled out across the UK as a priority. Workforce planning needs to consider the substantial rise in popularity of LTFT among trainees to offset any shortfalls in the present and future workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9644354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96443542022-11-15 Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT Cathcart, Jennifer Mayne, Kaitlin J Hull, Richard Jones, Michael Miller, Alastair BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: Interest in less than full-time training (LTFT) is growing among doctors in training. LTFT applications have previously been limited to fulfilment of specific criteria such as childcare or health reasons, but Health Education for England (HEE) has recently completed a pilot into LTFT for a third category: lifestyle choice. This was recognised as an opportunity to canvas trainee perspectives and intentions on LTFT and implications for workforce planning. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of UK trainees via an online questionnaire. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The survey was distributed via email to trainees in all specialities and stages of training across the UK. The survey focused on three key themes: experiences of current LTFT trainees, perspectives of trainees considering LTFT in the future and experience of working with LTFT colleagues. RESULTS: Responses were received from 783 trainees across the UK, with most responses received from physician trainees (76%). Current LTFT trainees represented one-third of respondents. Of those not currently working LTFT, 75% expressed an intention to do so in future with lifestyle being the most common reason. Almost half of this group were concerned about the impact on their training. Stigma, reduced training opportunities, prolonged training and the application process were commonly cited barriers. These difficulties were experienced by several current LTFT trainees, 32% of whom described a negative impact on their training. Almost two-thirds (62%) of respondents stated they wish to work LTFT as a consultant. CONCLUSION: Systems must adapt to increase access to LTFT training to promote trainee well-being and retention. Progress is being made and we suggest HEE’s category three pilot be rolled out across the UK as a priority. Workforce planning needs to consider the substantial rise in popularity of LTFT among trainees to offset any shortfalls in the present and future workforce. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9644354/ /pubmed/36343992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064518 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Cathcart, Jennifer
Mayne, Kaitlin J
Hull, Richard
Jones, Michael
Miller, Alastair
Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT
title Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT
title_full Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT
title_fullStr Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT
title_full_unstemmed Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT
title_short Less than full-time training (LTFT), is this the new norm? A cross-sectional study using a UK-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for LTFT
title_sort less than full-time training (ltft), is this the new norm? a cross-sectional study using a uk-wide online survey to evaluate trainees’ views and intentions for ltft
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064518
work_keys_str_mv AT cathcartjennifer lessthanfulltimetrainingltftisthisthenewnormacrosssectionalstudyusingaukwideonlinesurveytoevaluatetraineesviewsandintentionsforltft
AT maynekaitlinj lessthanfulltimetrainingltftisthisthenewnormacrosssectionalstudyusingaukwideonlinesurveytoevaluatetraineesviewsandintentionsforltft
AT hullrichard lessthanfulltimetrainingltftisthisthenewnormacrosssectionalstudyusingaukwideonlinesurveytoevaluatetraineesviewsandintentionsforltft
AT jonesmichael lessthanfulltimetrainingltftisthisthenewnormacrosssectionalstudyusingaukwideonlinesurveytoevaluatetraineesviewsandintentionsforltft
AT milleralastair lessthanfulltimetrainingltftisthisthenewnormacrosssectionalstudyusingaukwideonlinesurveytoevaluatetraineesviewsandintentionsforltft