Cargando…

Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation (USGPIVC) benefits patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) through visualising otherwise non‐visible and non‐palpable veins. Supervised live‐case training is an important component of learning this skill, but supervisor ava...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Nathan, Thomas, Joel, Woods, Christine, Rickard, Claire, Marsh, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12318
_version_ 1784826742126411776
author Peters, Nathan
Thomas, Joel
Woods, Christine
Rickard, Claire
Marsh, Nicole
author_facet Peters, Nathan
Thomas, Joel
Woods, Christine
Rickard, Claire
Marsh, Nicole
author_sort Peters, Nathan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation (USGPIVC) benefits patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) through visualising otherwise non‐visible and non‐palpable veins. Supervised live‐case training is an important component of learning this skill, but supervisor availability can present a barrier limiting or delaying staff completing their training. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the first‐attempt success rate of newly trained USGPIVC inserters using remote supervision and timely written feedback based on app‐based screen recordings taken during insertion. Secondary aims were overall procedural success, and inserter and patient experiences. METHODS: This study is an observational cohort study carried out between October and December 2021. Fourteen newly trained junior medical officers (JMOs) were eligible to utilise USGPIVC on a minimum of five consenting patients while simultaneously recording the ultrasound screen during insertion to capture their technique. Feedback was generated following expert review of these recordings against a standardised feedback tool. RESULTS: Average first‐attempt success was 71% (n = 72) in the 102 patients recruited. The average time for JMOs to receive feedback was 30 h, and 13 JMOs (93%) felt well supported and completed the remote training pathway. The majority of patients were female (n = 59; 58%), were aged 41–80 years (n = 75; 74%) and had ≥2 risk factors for DIVA (n = 57; 56%). CONCLUSIONS: First‐attempt success rates were similar when comparing remote supervision used in this study to direct supervision used by other studies.This finding supports incorporating remote supervision into training guidelines for USGPIVC as an alternative method of supervision, particularly when supervisor availability is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9644440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96444402023-09-16 Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience Peters, Nathan Thomas, Joel Woods, Christine Rickard, Claire Marsh, Nicole Australas J Ultrasound Med Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation (USGPIVC) benefits patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) through visualising otherwise non‐visible and non‐palpable veins. Supervised live‐case training is an important component of learning this skill, but supervisor availability can present a barrier limiting or delaying staff completing their training. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the first‐attempt success rate of newly trained USGPIVC inserters using remote supervision and timely written feedback based on app‐based screen recordings taken during insertion. Secondary aims were overall procedural success, and inserter and patient experiences. METHODS: This study is an observational cohort study carried out between October and December 2021. Fourteen newly trained junior medical officers (JMOs) were eligible to utilise USGPIVC on a minimum of five consenting patients while simultaneously recording the ultrasound screen during insertion to capture their technique. Feedback was generated following expert review of these recordings against a standardised feedback tool. RESULTS: Average first‐attempt success was 71% (n = 72) in the 102 patients recruited. The average time for JMOs to receive feedback was 30 h, and 13 JMOs (93%) felt well supported and completed the remote training pathway. The majority of patients were female (n = 59; 58%), were aged 41–80 years (n = 75; 74%) and had ≥2 risk factors for DIVA (n = 57; 56%). CONCLUSIONS: First‐attempt success rates were similar when comparing remote supervision used in this study to direct supervision used by other studies.This finding supports incorporating remote supervision into training guidelines for USGPIVC as an alternative method of supervision, particularly when supervisor availability is limited. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9644440/ /pubmed/36405792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12318 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Peters, Nathan
Thomas, Joel
Woods, Christine
Rickard, Claire
Marsh, Nicole
Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
title Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
title_full Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
title_fullStr Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
title_full_unstemmed Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
title_short Remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: A prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
title_sort remotely supervised ultrasound‐guided peripheral intravenous cannulation training: a prospective cohort study examining success rates and patient experience
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36405792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12318
work_keys_str_mv AT petersnathan remotelysupervisedultrasoundguidedperipheralintravenouscannulationtrainingaprospectivecohortstudyexaminingsuccessratesandpatientexperience
AT thomasjoel remotelysupervisedultrasoundguidedperipheralintravenouscannulationtrainingaprospectivecohortstudyexaminingsuccessratesandpatientexperience
AT woodschristine remotelysupervisedultrasoundguidedperipheralintravenouscannulationtrainingaprospectivecohortstudyexaminingsuccessratesandpatientexperience
AT rickardclaire remotelysupervisedultrasoundguidedperipheralintravenouscannulationtrainingaprospectivecohortstudyexaminingsuccessratesandpatientexperience
AT marshnicole remotelysupervisedultrasoundguidedperipheralintravenouscannulationtrainingaprospectivecohortstudyexaminingsuccessratesandpatientexperience