Cargando…
Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence suggests data and insights from the clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries are not being fully utilised, leaving health service managers, clinicians and providers without clear guidance on how best to improve healthcare delivery. This lack of upta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1 |
_version_ | 1784826752849149952 |
---|---|
author | Dempsey, Kathy Ferguson, Caleb Walczak, Adam Middleton, Sandy Levi, Christopher Morton, Rachael L. |
author_facet | Dempsey, Kathy Ferguson, Caleb Walczak, Adam Middleton, Sandy Levi, Christopher Morton, Rachael L. |
author_sort | Dempsey, Kathy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence suggests data and insights from the clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries are not being fully utilised, leaving health service managers, clinicians and providers without clear guidance on how best to improve healthcare delivery. This lack of uptake of existing research knowledge represents low value to the healthcare system and needs to change. METHODS: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were systematically searched. Included studies were published between 2000 and 2020 reporting on the attributes, evidence usage and impact of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries on health service delivery. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles including one randomised controlled trial, eight before-and-after studies, eight case studies/reviews, five surveys and four interview studies, covering a wide range of medical conditions and conducted in the USA, Australia and Europe, were identified. Five complementary strategies were derived to maximise the likelihood of best practice health service delivery: (1) feedback and transparency, (2) intervention sustainability, (3) clinical practice guideline adherence, (4) productive partnerships and (5) whole-of-team approach. CONCLUSION: These five strategies, used in context-relevant combinations, are most likely to support the application of existing high-quality data, adding value to health service delivery. The review highlighted the limitations of study design in opportunistic registry studies that do not produce clear, usable evidence to guide changes to health service implementation practices. Recommendations include exploration of innovative methodologies, improved coordination of national registries and the use of incentives to encourage guideline adherence and wider dissemination of strategies used by successful registries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9644489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96444892022-11-15 Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review Dempsey, Kathy Ferguson, Caleb Walczak, Adam Middleton, Sandy Levi, Christopher Morton, Rachael L. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence suggests data and insights from the clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries are not being fully utilised, leaving health service managers, clinicians and providers without clear guidance on how best to improve healthcare delivery. This lack of uptake of existing research knowledge represents low value to the healthcare system and needs to change. METHODS: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were systematically searched. Included studies were published between 2000 and 2020 reporting on the attributes, evidence usage and impact of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registries on health service delivery. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles including one randomised controlled trial, eight before-and-after studies, eight case studies/reviews, five surveys and four interview studies, covering a wide range of medical conditions and conducted in the USA, Australia and Europe, were identified. Five complementary strategies were derived to maximise the likelihood of best practice health service delivery: (1) feedback and transparency, (2) intervention sustainability, (3) clinical practice guideline adherence, (4) productive partnerships and (5) whole-of-team approach. CONCLUSION: These five strategies, used in context-relevant combinations, are most likely to support the application of existing high-quality data, adding value to health service delivery. The review highlighted the limitations of study design in opportunistic registry studies that do not produce clear, usable evidence to guide changes to health service implementation practices. Recommendations include exploration of innovative methodologies, improved coordination of national registries and the use of incentives to encourage guideline adherence and wider dissemination of strategies used by successful registries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9644489/ /pubmed/36352475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dempsey, Kathy Ferguson, Caleb Walczak, Adam Middleton, Sandy Levi, Christopher Morton, Rachael L. Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review |
title | Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review |
title_full | Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review |
title_short | Which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? A systematic review |
title_sort | which strategies support the effective use of clinical practice guidelines and clinical quality registry data to inform health service delivery? a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02104-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dempseykathy whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview AT fergusoncaleb whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview AT walczakadam whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview AT middletonsandy whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview AT levichristopher whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview AT mortonrachaell whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview AT whichstrategiessupporttheeffectiveuseofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandclinicalqualityregistrydatatoinformhealthservicedeliveryasystematicreview |