Cargando…

Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants

BACKGROUND: Bluetongue (BT) is a disease of concern to animal breeders, so the question on their minds is whether they can predict the risk of the disease before it occurs. The main objective of this study is to enhance the accuracy of BT risk prediction by relying on machine learning (ML) approache...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouda, Hagar F., Hassan, Fardos A. M., El-Araby, Eman E., Moawed, Sherif A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z
_version_ 1784826760625389568
author Gouda, Hagar F.
Hassan, Fardos A. M.
El-Araby, Eman E.
Moawed, Sherif A.
author_facet Gouda, Hagar F.
Hassan, Fardos A. M.
El-Araby, Eman E.
Moawed, Sherif A.
author_sort Gouda, Hagar F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bluetongue (BT) is a disease of concern to animal breeders, so the question on their minds is whether they can predict the risk of the disease before it occurs. The main objective of this study is to enhance the accuracy of BT risk prediction by relying on machine learning (ML) approaches to help in fulfilling this inquiry. Several risk factors of BT that affect the occurrence and magnitude of animal infection with the virus have been reported globally. Additionally, risk factors, such as sex, age, species, and season, unevenly affect animal health and welfare. Therefore, the seroprevalence study data of 233 apparently healthy animals (125 sheep and 108 goats) from five different provinces in Egypt were used to analyze and compare the performance of the algorithms in predicting BT risk. RESULTS: Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and a feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) were used to develop predictive BT risk models and compare their performance to the base model (LR). Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), precision, and F1 score. The results indicated that RF performed better than other models, with an AUC score of 81%, ANN of 79.6%, and DT of 72.85%. In terms of performance and prediction, LR showed a much lower value (AUC = 69%). Upon further observation of the results, it was discovered that age and season were the most important predictor variables reported in classification and prediction. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can be utilized to predict and control BT risk factors in sheep and goats, with better diagnostic discrimination in terms of accuracy, TPR, FNR, FPR, and precision of ML models over traditional and commonly used LR models. Our findings advocate that the implementation of ML algorithms, mainly RF, in farm decision making and prediction is a promising technique for analyzing cross-section studies, providing adequate predictive power and significant competence in identifying and ranking predictors representing potential risk factors for BT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9644523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96445232022-11-15 Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants Gouda, Hagar F. Hassan, Fardos A. M. El-Araby, Eman E. Moawed, Sherif A. BMC Vet Res Research BACKGROUND: Bluetongue (BT) is a disease of concern to animal breeders, so the question on their minds is whether they can predict the risk of the disease before it occurs. The main objective of this study is to enhance the accuracy of BT risk prediction by relying on machine learning (ML) approaches to help in fulfilling this inquiry. Several risk factors of BT that affect the occurrence and magnitude of animal infection with the virus have been reported globally. Additionally, risk factors, such as sex, age, species, and season, unevenly affect animal health and welfare. Therefore, the seroprevalence study data of 233 apparently healthy animals (125 sheep and 108 goats) from five different provinces in Egypt were used to analyze and compare the performance of the algorithms in predicting BT risk. RESULTS: Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and a feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) were used to develop predictive BT risk models and compare their performance to the base model (LR). Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), precision, and F1 score. The results indicated that RF performed better than other models, with an AUC score of 81%, ANN of 79.6%, and DT of 72.85%. In terms of performance and prediction, LR showed a much lower value (AUC = 69%). Upon further observation of the results, it was discovered that age and season were the most important predictor variables reported in classification and prediction. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can be utilized to predict and control BT risk factors in sheep and goats, with better diagnostic discrimination in terms of accuracy, TPR, FNR, FPR, and precision of ML models over traditional and commonly used LR models. Our findings advocate that the implementation of ML algorithms, mainly RF, in farm decision making and prediction is a promising technique for analyzing cross-section studies, providing adequate predictive power and significant competence in identifying and ranking predictors representing potential risk factors for BT. BioMed Central 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9644523/ /pubmed/36348478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gouda, Hagar F.
Hassan, Fardos A. M.
El-Araby, Eman E.
Moawed, Sherif A.
Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_full Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_fullStr Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_short Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_sort comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z
work_keys_str_mv AT goudahagarf comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants
AT hassanfardosam comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants
AT elarabyemane comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants
AT moawedsherifa comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants