Cargando…
Characteristics and recovery methods of studies falsely excluded during literature screening—a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Due to the growing need to provide evidence syntheses under time constraints, researchers have begun focusing on the exploration of rapid review methods, which often employ single-reviewer literature screening. However, single-reviewer screening misses, on average, 13% of relevant studie...
Autores principales: | Affengruber, Lisa, Dobrescu, Andreea, Persad, Emma, Klerings, Irma, Wagner, Gernot, Sommer, Isolde, Gartlehner, Gerald |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02109-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study
por: Gartlehner, Gerald, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews
por: Affengruber, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Effectiveness of interventions for the remediation of lead-contaminated soil to prevent or reduce lead exposure - A systematic review
por: Dobrescu, Andreea-Iulia, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID‐19: a rapid review
por: Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Risk of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Angiography with Carbon Dioxide Compared to Iodine-Containing Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Wagner, Gernot, et al.
Publicado: (2022)