Cargando…

Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model

BACKGROUND: In 2019 daily liquid methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone were primary opioid agonist treatments for correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia. However, both had significant potential for diversion to other patients, and their daily administration was resource intensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ling, R., White, B., Roberts, J., Cretikos, M., Howard, M. V., Haber, P. S., Lintzeris, N., Reeves, P., Dunlop, A. J., Searles, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8
_version_ 1784826768709910528
author Ling, R.
White, B.
Roberts, J.
Cretikos, M.
Howard, M. V.
Haber, P. S.
Lintzeris, N.
Reeves, P.
Dunlop, A. J.
Searles, A.
author_facet Ling, R.
White, B.
Roberts, J.
Cretikos, M.
Howard, M. V.
Haber, P. S.
Lintzeris, N.
Reeves, P.
Dunlop, A. J.
Searles, A.
author_sort Ling, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2019 daily liquid methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone were primary opioid agonist treatments for correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia. However, both had significant potential for diversion to other patients, and their daily administration was resource intensive. An alternative treatment in the form of subcutaneous depot buprenorphine became a viable option following a safety trial in 2020 – the UNLOC-T study. Depot preparation demonstrated advantages over current treatments as more difficult to divert and requiring fewer administrations. This paper reports the results of economic modelling of staffing costs in medication administration comparing depot buprenorphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine provision in UNLOC-T trial facilities. METHODS: The costing study adopted a micro-costing approach involving the synthesis of cost data from the UNLOC-T clinical trial as well as data collected from Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network records. Labour and materials data were collected during site observations and interviews. Costs were calculated from two payer perspectives: a) the New South Wales (state) government which funds custodial and health services; and b) the Australian Commonwealth government, which pays for medications. The analysis compared the monthly-per-patient cost for each of the three medications in trial-site facilities during July 2019. This was followed by simulation of depot buprenorphine implementation across the study population. Costs associated with medical assessment and reviews were excluded. RESULTS: The monthly-per-patient New South Wales government service costs of depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine were: $151, $379 and $1,529 respectively while Commonwealth government medication costs were $434, $80 and $525. The implementation simulation found that service costs of depot buprenorphine declined as patients transitioned from weekly to monthly administration. Costs of treatment using the other medications increased as patient numbers decreased alongside fixed costs. At 12 months, monthly-per-patient service costs for depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine—which would be completely phased out by month 13—were $92, $530 and $2,162 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Depot buprenorphine was consistently the least costly of the treatment options. Future modelling could allow for dynamic patient populations and downstream impacts for participants and the state health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000942257. Registered 4 June 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9644557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96445572022-11-15 Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model Ling, R. White, B. Roberts, J. Cretikos, M. Howard, M. V. Haber, P. S. Lintzeris, N. Reeves, P. Dunlop, A. J. Searles, A. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: In 2019 daily liquid methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone were primary opioid agonist treatments for correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia. However, both had significant potential for diversion to other patients, and their daily administration was resource intensive. An alternative treatment in the form of subcutaneous depot buprenorphine became a viable option following a safety trial in 2020 – the UNLOC-T study. Depot preparation demonstrated advantages over current treatments as more difficult to divert and requiring fewer administrations. This paper reports the results of economic modelling of staffing costs in medication administration comparing depot buprenorphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine provision in UNLOC-T trial facilities. METHODS: The costing study adopted a micro-costing approach involving the synthesis of cost data from the UNLOC-T clinical trial as well as data collected from Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network records. Labour and materials data were collected during site observations and interviews. Costs were calculated from two payer perspectives: a) the New South Wales (state) government which funds custodial and health services; and b) the Australian Commonwealth government, which pays for medications. The analysis compared the monthly-per-patient cost for each of the three medications in trial-site facilities during July 2019. This was followed by simulation of depot buprenorphine implementation across the study population. Costs associated with medical assessment and reviews were excluded. RESULTS: The monthly-per-patient New South Wales government service costs of depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine were: $151, $379 and $1,529 respectively while Commonwealth government medication costs were $434, $80 and $525. The implementation simulation found that service costs of depot buprenorphine declined as patients transitioned from weekly to monthly administration. Costs of treatment using the other medications increased as patient numbers decreased alongside fixed costs. At 12 months, monthly-per-patient service costs for depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine—which would be completely phased out by month 13—were $92, $530 and $2,162 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Depot buprenorphine was consistently the least costly of the treatment options. Future modelling could allow for dynamic patient populations and downstream impacts for participants and the state health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000942257. Registered 4 June 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8. BioMed Central 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9644557/ /pubmed/36348369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ling, R.
White, B.
Roberts, J.
Cretikos, M.
Howard, M. V.
Haber, P. S.
Lintzeris, N.
Reeves, P.
Dunlop, A. J.
Searles, A.
Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model
title Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model
title_full Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model
title_fullStr Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model
title_full_unstemmed Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model
title_short Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model
title_sort depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in new south wales correctional centres: a costing model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lingr depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT whiteb depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT robertsj depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT cretikosm depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT howardmv depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT haberps depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT lintzerisn depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT reevesp depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT dunlopaj depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel
AT searlesa depotbuprenorphineasanopioidagonisttherapyinnewsouthwalescorrectionalcentresacostingmodel