Cargando…

Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?

BACKGROUND: Recent research shows that genetic selection has high potential to reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases in livestock. However, like all interventions that target infectious diseases, genetic selection of livestock can exert selection pressure on pathogen populations. Such selecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hulst, Andries D., Bijma, Piter, De Jong, Mart C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00764-0
_version_ 1784826776262803456
author Hulst, Andries D.
Bijma, Piter
De Jong, Mart C. M.
author_facet Hulst, Andries D.
Bijma, Piter
De Jong, Mart C. M.
author_sort Hulst, Andries D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent research shows that genetic selection has high potential to reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases in livestock. However, like all interventions that target infectious diseases, genetic selection of livestock can exert selection pressure on pathogen populations. Such selection on the pathogen may lead to escape strategies and reduce the effect of selection of livestock for disease resistance. Thus, to successfully breed livestock for lower disease prevalence, it is essential to develop strategies that prevent the invasion of pathogen mutants that escape host resistance. Here we investigate the conditions under which such “escape mutants” can replace wild-type pathogens in a closed livestock population using a mathematical model of disease transmission. RESULTS: Assuming a single gene that confers sufficient resistance, results show that genetic selection for resistance in livestock typically leads to an “invasion window” within which an escape mutant of the pathogen can invade. The bounds of the invasion window are determined by the frequency of resistant hosts in the population. The lower bound occurs when the escape mutant has an advantage over the wild-type pathogen in the population. The upper bound occurs when local eradication of the pathogen is expected. The invasion window is smallest when host resistance is strong and when infection with the wild-type pathogen provides cross immunity to infection with the escape mutant. CONCLUSIONS: To minimise opportunities for pathogens to adapt, under the assumptions of our model, the aim of disease control through genetic selection should be to achieve herd-level eradication of the infection faster than the rate of emergence of escape mutants of the pathogen. Especially for microparasitic infections, this could be achieved by placing animals into herds according to their genetic resistance, such that these herds stay completely out of the invasion window. In contrast to classical breeding theory, our model suggests that multi-trait selection with gradual improvement of each trait of the breeding goal might not be the best strategy when resistance to infectious disease is part of the breeding goal. Temporally, combining genetic selection with other interventions helps to make the invasion window smaller, and thereby reduces the risk of invasion of escape mutants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9644597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96445972022-11-15 Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases? Hulst, Andries D. Bijma, Piter De Jong, Mart C. M. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent research shows that genetic selection has high potential to reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases in livestock. However, like all interventions that target infectious diseases, genetic selection of livestock can exert selection pressure on pathogen populations. Such selection on the pathogen may lead to escape strategies and reduce the effect of selection of livestock for disease resistance. Thus, to successfully breed livestock for lower disease prevalence, it is essential to develop strategies that prevent the invasion of pathogen mutants that escape host resistance. Here we investigate the conditions under which such “escape mutants” can replace wild-type pathogens in a closed livestock population using a mathematical model of disease transmission. RESULTS: Assuming a single gene that confers sufficient resistance, results show that genetic selection for resistance in livestock typically leads to an “invasion window” within which an escape mutant of the pathogen can invade. The bounds of the invasion window are determined by the frequency of resistant hosts in the population. The lower bound occurs when the escape mutant has an advantage over the wild-type pathogen in the population. The upper bound occurs when local eradication of the pathogen is expected. The invasion window is smallest when host resistance is strong and when infection with the wild-type pathogen provides cross immunity to infection with the escape mutant. CONCLUSIONS: To minimise opportunities for pathogens to adapt, under the assumptions of our model, the aim of disease control through genetic selection should be to achieve herd-level eradication of the infection faster than the rate of emergence of escape mutants of the pathogen. Especially for microparasitic infections, this could be achieved by placing animals into herds according to their genetic resistance, such that these herds stay completely out of the invasion window. In contrast to classical breeding theory, our model suggests that multi-trait selection with gradual improvement of each trait of the breeding goal might not be the best strategy when resistance to infectious disease is part of the breeding goal. Temporally, combining genetic selection with other interventions helps to make the invasion window smaller, and thereby reduces the risk of invasion of escape mutants. BioMed Central 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9644597/ /pubmed/36348272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00764-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hulst, Andries D.
Bijma, Piter
De Jong, Mart C. M.
Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
title Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
title_full Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
title_fullStr Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
title_full_unstemmed Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
title_short Can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
title_sort can breeders prevent pathogen adaptation when selecting for increased resistance to infectious diseases?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36348272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00764-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hulstandriesd canbreederspreventpathogenadaptationwhenselectingforincreasedresistancetoinfectiousdiseases
AT bijmapiter canbreederspreventpathogenadaptationwhenselectingforincreasedresistancetoinfectiousdiseases
AT dejongmartcm canbreederspreventpathogenadaptationwhenselectingforincreasedresistancetoinfectiousdiseases