Cargando…
Legitimacy—not Justice—and the Case for Judicial Review
Sceptics of judicial review—from Jeremy Waldron to those in the Judicial Power Project—have tended to attribute to their opponents an erroneous prioritisation of ‘justice’ over ‘legitimacy’. They claim that those who make the case for judicial review do so on the grounds that ‘judges know best’, and...
Autor principal: | Hickey, Tom |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac009 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How Interpersonal Justice Shapes Legitimacy Perceptions: The Role of Interpersonal Justice Trajectories and Current Experience
por: Liang, Juan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Value Alignment and Public Perceived Legitimacy of the European Union and the Court of Justice
por: Grosfeld, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Beyond Justice Perceptions: The Role of Interpersonal Justice Trajectories and Social Class in Perceived Legitimacy of Authority Figures
por: Liang, Juan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
(In)justice in academia: procedural fairness, students’ academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities
por: Główczewski, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Judicial demand of medications through the Federal Justice of the State of Paraná
por: Nisihara, Renato Mitsunori, et al.
Publicado: (2017)