Cargando…
Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study
This study evaluated osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and biphasic ceramic based on hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) in rat tibias. Noncritical bone defects were made in the tibias of 28 rats that were randomly assigned to 2 groups: DBB: DBB...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204378 |
_version_ | 1784826901876965376 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Vithor Xavier Resende Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio, Elcio de Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Vithor Xavier Resende Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio, Elcio de Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Vithor Xavier Resende |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and biphasic ceramic based on hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) in rat tibias. Noncritical bone defects were made in the tibias of 28 rats that were randomly assigned to 2 groups: DBB: DBB-filled defects and HA/TCP: HA/TCP-filled defects. Bone defects were made in the tibias bilaterally and filled with biomaterials. After 60 days, the implants were inserted, and the animals were euthanized 15 and 45 days after the implants were installed. Osseointegration was evaluated by biomechanical, microtomographic and histometric analysis. Implants installed in the defects filled with DBB presented higher removal torque forces (2.33 ± 0.51 Ncm vs. 1.50 ± 0.54 Ncm) and mineralized tissue volume around implants at 15 days (34.96 ± 3.68 % vs. 25.61 ± 2.95 %) and greater bone-implant contact (20.87 ± 8.28 % vs. 11.52 ± 7.42 %) and bone area within implant threads (26.83 ± 12.35 % vs. 11.98 ± 7.56 %) at 45 days compared to the measurements of implants in areas grafted with HA/TCP. Implants installed in defects in areas grafted with DBB had a better osseointegration pattern than implants placed in defects in areas grafted with HA/TCP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9645139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96451392022-11-14 Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study de Oliveira, Vithor Xavier Resende Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio, Elcio de Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes Braz Dent J Article This study evaluated osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and biphasic ceramic based on hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) in rat tibias. Noncritical bone defects were made in the tibias of 28 rats that were randomly assigned to 2 groups: DBB: DBB-filled defects and HA/TCP: HA/TCP-filled defects. Bone defects were made in the tibias bilaterally and filled with biomaterials. After 60 days, the implants were inserted, and the animals were euthanized 15 and 45 days after the implants were installed. Osseointegration was evaluated by biomechanical, microtomographic and histometric analysis. Implants installed in the defects filled with DBB presented higher removal torque forces (2.33 ± 0.51 Ncm vs. 1.50 ± 0.54 Ncm) and mineralized tissue volume around implants at 15 days (34.96 ± 3.68 % vs. 25.61 ± 2.95 %) and greater bone-implant contact (20.87 ± 8.28 % vs. 11.52 ± 7.42 %) and bone area within implant threads (26.83 ± 12.35 % vs. 11.98 ± 7.56 %) at 45 days compared to the measurements of implants in areas grafted with HA/TCP. Implants installed in defects in areas grafted with DBB had a better osseointegration pattern than implants placed in defects in areas grafted with HA/TCP. Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9645139/ /pubmed/35262548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204378 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Article de Oliveira, Vithor Xavier Resende Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio, Elcio de Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study |
title | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different
osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study |
title_full | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different
osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different
osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different
osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study |
title_short | Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different
osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study |
title_sort | comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different
osteoconductive biomaterials. preclinical study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiravithorxavierresende comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdifferentosteoconductivebiomaterialspreclinicalstudy AT pinottifelipeeduardo comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdifferentosteoconductivebiomaterialspreclinicalstudy AT marcantoniorosemaryadrianachierici comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdifferentosteoconductivebiomaterialspreclinicalstudy AT marcantonioelcio comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdifferentosteoconductivebiomaterialspreclinicalstudy AT deoliveiraguilhermejosepimentellopes comparisonofosseointegrationinareasgraftedwithdifferentosteoconductivebiomaterialspreclinicalstudy |