Cargando…
SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR was similar
The World Health Organization has declared the widespread spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated disease (COVID-19) a public health emergency. The standard gold test for detecting the virus is the RT-PCR, performed from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. However, this test may be uncomfortable for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204591 |
_version_ | 1784826905890914304 |
---|---|
author | Guimarães, Taísa Coelho Marques, Barbara Bruno Fagundes Tinoco, Justine Monteiro Monnerat Porto, Luís Cristóvão Moraes Sobrino Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto Fischer, Ricardo Guimarães |
author_facet | Guimarães, Taísa Coelho Marques, Barbara Bruno Fagundes Tinoco, Justine Monteiro Monnerat Porto, Luís Cristóvão Moraes Sobrino Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto Fischer, Ricardo Guimarães |
author_sort | Guimarães, Taísa Coelho |
collection | PubMed |
description | The World Health Organization has declared the widespread spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated disease (COVID-19) a public health emergency. The standard gold test for detecting the virus is the RT-PCR, performed from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. However, this test may be uncomfortable for the patient and requires specific training and attire from the health professional responsible for collecting the sample. Therefore, the search for alternative ways to collect samples that may be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 is relevant. This study aimed to compare the results obtained from NPS and saliva samples. NPS and saliva samples were collected from 189 symptomatic outpatients suspected of COVID-19, who came to Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic. RNA extraction was performed using the Bio-Gene DNA/RNA Viral Extraction kit (Bioclin®). Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reactions used the Molecular SARS-CoV-2 (E / RP) kit (Bio-Manguinhos). The results indicated that 142 showed a non-detectable result (ND), while 47 showed a detectable result (D). Among the 142 "ND", 137 (94.4%) saliva samples obtained the same result, while 5 samples (3.4%) were "D". Among the 47 "D" swab samples, 35 (74.4%) showed the same result in the saliva samples. The sensitivity of the saliva test was 0.74 and the specificity was 0.97. The positive predictive value was 0.88 while the negative predictive value was 0.92. The results showed that detection of Sars-CoV-2 using saliva samples showed high sensitivity and specificity compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9645155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96451552022-11-14 SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR was similar Guimarães, Taísa Coelho Marques, Barbara Bruno Fagundes Tinoco, Justine Monteiro Monnerat Porto, Luís Cristóvão Moraes Sobrino Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto Fischer, Ricardo Guimarães Braz Dent J Article The World Health Organization has declared the widespread spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated disease (COVID-19) a public health emergency. The standard gold test for detecting the virus is the RT-PCR, performed from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. However, this test may be uncomfortable for the patient and requires specific training and attire from the health professional responsible for collecting the sample. Therefore, the search for alternative ways to collect samples that may be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 is relevant. This study aimed to compare the results obtained from NPS and saliva samples. NPS and saliva samples were collected from 189 symptomatic outpatients suspected of COVID-19, who came to Piquet Carneiro Polyclinic. RNA extraction was performed using the Bio-Gene DNA/RNA Viral Extraction kit (Bioclin®). Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reactions used the Molecular SARS-CoV-2 (E / RP) kit (Bio-Manguinhos). The results indicated that 142 showed a non-detectable result (ND), while 47 showed a detectable result (D). Among the 142 "ND", 137 (94.4%) saliva samples obtained the same result, while 5 samples (3.4%) were "D". Among the 47 "D" swab samples, 35 (74.4%) showed the same result in the saliva samples. The sensitivity of the saliva test was 0.74 and the specificity was 0.97. The positive predictive value was 0.88 while the negative predictive value was 0.92. The results showed that detection of Sars-CoV-2 using saliva samples showed high sensitivity and specificity compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9645155/ /pubmed/35508038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204591 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Article Guimarães, Taísa Coelho Marques, Barbara Bruno Fagundes Tinoco, Justine Monteiro Monnerat Porto, Luís Cristóvão Moraes Sobrino Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto Fischer, Ricardo Guimarães SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR was similar |
title | SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR
was similar |
title_full | SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR
was similar |
title_fullStr | SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR
was similar |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR
was similar |
title_short | SARS-COV-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using RT-PCR
was similar |
title_sort | sars-cov-2 detection in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs using rt-pcr
was similar |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guimaraestaisacoelho sarscov2detectioninsalivaandnasopharyngealswabsusingrtpcrwassimilar AT marquesbarbarabrunofagundes sarscov2detectioninsalivaandnasopharyngealswabsusingrtpcrwassimilar AT tinocojustinemonteiromonnerat sarscov2detectioninsalivaandnasopharyngealswabsusingrtpcrwassimilar AT portoluiscristovaomoraessobrino sarscov2detectioninsalivaandnasopharyngealswabsusingrtpcrwassimilar AT tinocoeduardomunizbarretto sarscov2detectioninsalivaandnasopharyngealswabsusingrtpcrwassimilar AT fischerricardoguimaraes sarscov2detectioninsalivaandnasopharyngealswabsusingrtpcrwassimilar |