Cargando…

Effect of surrounded shade and specimen`s thickness on color adjustment potential of a single-shade composite

This study evaluated the effect of surrounded shade and specimens` thickness on the color adjustment potential (CAP) of a single-shade composite. The composite Vittra APS Unique was surrounded (dual specimens) or not (simple specimens) by a control composite (shade A1, A2, or A3). Simple specimens o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barros, Mariana Silva, Silva, Paula Fernanda Damasceno, Santana, Márcia Luciana Carregosa, de Bragança, Rafaella Mariana Fontes, Faria-e-Silva, André Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204973
Descripción
Sumario:This study evaluated the effect of surrounded shade and specimens` thickness on the color adjustment potential (CAP) of a single-shade composite. The composite Vittra APS Unique was surrounded (dual specimens) or not (simple specimens) by a control composite (shade A1, A2, or A3). Simple specimens of the control composite were also confectioned. Opacity and whiteness index for dentistry (WI(D)) were calculated for simple specimens. Color differences between the simple (ΔE*(SIMPLE))/ dual specimens (ΔE*(DUAL)) and the controls were calculated. CAP was calculated based on the ratio between ΔE* (SIMPLE) and ΔE* (DUAL). The tested composite presented lower opacity (53 to 62% vs. 80 to 93%) and higher WI(D) (≈ 42 vs. 18 to 32) than controls. Irrespective of the specimens’ thickness (1.0/ 1.5 mm), the lowest values of ΔE* (SIMPLE) (11.1/ 10.8) and ΔE*(DUAL) (7.2/ 6.1) were observed using the surrounding shade A1. The shade A3 yielded higher ΔE*(SIMPLE) (16.4/ 17.1) and ΔE* (DUAL) (11.3/ 12.3) than the A2 (ΔE*(SIMPLE) = 13.4/ 14.6; and ΔE* (DUAL) = 9.7/ 10.3). The specimen`s thickness significantly affected the CAP (0.35 and 0.44 for 1.0 and 1.5 mm, respectively) only for shade A1, which had the highest CAP values. The shade A3 resulted in higher CAP values (0.31) than A2 (0.27) when 1.0-mm thick specimens were used, but similar values were observed for 1.5 thick specimens (≈ 0.29). In conclusion, both surrounding shade and specimen thickness can affect the CAP of a single-shade resin composite.