Cargando…
Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants
The longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation is determined by the stability of the implant and abutment interfaces. True morse taper connections on dental restorations have been effective, however activation force still empirical. This work compared the activation strength and internal contact of Mors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202205084 |
_version_ | 1784826909347020800 |
---|---|
author | dos Santos, Angelo Marcelo Tirado Stabile, Glaykon Alex Vitti Felizardo, Klissia Romero dos Santos, Sérgio Eduardo Ramos Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil Gonini, Alcides Gonini Lopes, Murilo Baena |
author_facet | dos Santos, Angelo Marcelo Tirado Stabile, Glaykon Alex Vitti Felizardo, Klissia Romero dos Santos, Sérgio Eduardo Ramos Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil Gonini, Alcides Gonini Lopes, Murilo Baena |
author_sort | dos Santos, Angelo Marcelo Tirado |
collection | PubMed |
description | The longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation is determined by the stability of the implant and abutment interfaces. True morse taper connections on dental restorations have been effective, however activation force still empirical. This work compared the activation strength and internal contact of Morse taper system according to the removal force. Eighty sets, composed of implants and prosthetic abutments, were evaluated with different internal contact areas; 15.12mm(2) (G3.3) and 21.25mm(2) (G4.3). The specimens were activated at 0° and 30°, with loads of 10, 20, 40 and 60N. The specimens were submitted to tensile test and the data to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α=0.05). Representative specimens were examined under SEM. Removal force of G3.3 (2.15±1.33MPa) did not differed to G4.3 (1.99±1.03MPa). The activation at 0º (2.95±0.98MPa) statistically differed to 30º (1.19±0.54MPa). The 60N load was statistically superior for G3.3 and there was no statistical difference between 20N to 60N in G4.3. The values of 10N at 30(o) and 20N at the long axis of the morse taper implant, independent of the frictional contact area showed the best settlement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9645169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96451692022-11-14 Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants dos Santos, Angelo Marcelo Tirado Stabile, Glaykon Alex Vitti Felizardo, Klissia Romero dos Santos, Sérgio Eduardo Ramos Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil Gonini, Alcides Gonini Lopes, Murilo Baena Braz Dent J Article The longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation is determined by the stability of the implant and abutment interfaces. True morse taper connections on dental restorations have been effective, however activation force still empirical. This work compared the activation strength and internal contact of Morse taper system according to the removal force. Eighty sets, composed of implants and prosthetic abutments, were evaluated with different internal contact areas; 15.12mm(2) (G3.3) and 21.25mm(2) (G4.3). The specimens were activated at 0° and 30°, with loads of 10, 20, 40 and 60N. The specimens were submitted to tensile test and the data to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α=0.05). Representative specimens were examined under SEM. Removal force of G3.3 (2.15±1.33MPa) did not differed to G4.3 (1.99±1.03MPa). The activation at 0º (2.95±0.98MPa) statistically differed to 30º (1.19±0.54MPa). The 60N load was statistically superior for G3.3 and there was no statistical difference between 20N to 60N in G4.3. The values of 10N at 30(o) and 20N at the long axis of the morse taper implant, independent of the frictional contact area showed the best settlement. Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9645169/ /pubmed/36287501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202205084 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Article dos Santos, Angelo Marcelo Tirado Stabile, Glaykon Alex Vitti Felizardo, Klissia Romero dos Santos, Sérgio Eduardo Ramos Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil Gonini, Alcides Gonini Lopes, Murilo Baena Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants |
title | Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants |
title_full | Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants |
title_short | Evaluation of Removal Force in Prosthetic Components of Morse Taper Dental Implants |
title_sort | evaluation of removal force in prosthetic components of morse taper dental implants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202205084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dossantosangelomarcelotirado evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT stabileglaykonalexvitti evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT felizardoklissiaromero evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT dossantossergioeduardoramos evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT bergersandrinebittencourt evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT guiraldoricardodanil evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT goninialcidesgonini evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants AT lopesmurilobaena evaluationofremovalforceinprostheticcomponentsofmorsetaperdentalimplants |