Cargando…

Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak

Endophytic fungi occupy various ecological niches, which reinforces their diversity. As few studies have investigated the endophytic fungi of alpine conifers, we focused on four species of alpine conifers in this study—Abies nephrolepis, Pinus pumila, Taxus cuspidata var. nana, and Thuja koraiensis—...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eo, Ju-Kyeong, Eom, Ahn-Heum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36404901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2022.2135832
_version_ 1784826929749164032
author Eo, Ju-Kyeong
Eom, Ahn-Heum
author_facet Eo, Ju-Kyeong
Eom, Ahn-Heum
author_sort Eo, Ju-Kyeong
collection PubMed
description Endophytic fungi occupy various ecological niches, which reinforces their diversity. As few studies have investigated the endophytic fungi of alpine conifers, we focused on four species of alpine conifers in this study—Abies nephrolepis, Pinus pumila, Taxus cuspidata var. nana, and Thuja koraiensis—and examined them for endophytic fungi. A total of 108 endophytic fungi were isolated. There were four taxa in A. nephrolepis, 12 in P. pumila, 18 in T. cuspidata var. nana, and 17 in T. koraiensis; these were divided into five classes: Agaricomycetes (3.2%), Dothideomycetes (29.0%), Leotiomycetes (15.0%), Sordariomycetes (41.9%), and Orbiliomycetes (1.6%). The most prevalent fungi were Sydowia polyspora (22.7%) and Xylariaceae sp. (22.7%) in P. pumila, Phomopsis juglandina (16.1%) in T. cuspidata var. nana, and Thuja-endophytes sp. 1 (70.0%) in T. koraiensis. However, there was no dominant species growing in A. nephrolepis. Some host plants were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. We obtained 4618 reads for A. nephrolepis and 2268 reads for T. koraiensis. At the genus level, the top three endophytic fungi were Ophiostomataceae_uc (64.6%), Nectriaceae_uc (15.5%), and unclassified organism (18.0%) in A. nephrolepis and Nectriaceae_uc (41.9%), Ophiostomataceae_uc (41.8%), and Magnaporthaceae_uc (9.2%) in T. koraiensis. Our results show that there are different communities of endophytic fungi among different host plants, even if the host plants are in the same region. Such ecological niches are important in terms of the ecological restoration of alpine conifers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9645271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96452712022-11-18 Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak Eo, Ju-Kyeong Eom, Ahn-Heum Mycobiology Research Articles Endophytic fungi occupy various ecological niches, which reinforces their diversity. As few studies have investigated the endophytic fungi of alpine conifers, we focused on four species of alpine conifers in this study—Abies nephrolepis, Pinus pumila, Taxus cuspidata var. nana, and Thuja koraiensis—and examined them for endophytic fungi. A total of 108 endophytic fungi were isolated. There were four taxa in A. nephrolepis, 12 in P. pumila, 18 in T. cuspidata var. nana, and 17 in T. koraiensis; these were divided into five classes: Agaricomycetes (3.2%), Dothideomycetes (29.0%), Leotiomycetes (15.0%), Sordariomycetes (41.9%), and Orbiliomycetes (1.6%). The most prevalent fungi were Sydowia polyspora (22.7%) and Xylariaceae sp. (22.7%) in P. pumila, Phomopsis juglandina (16.1%) in T. cuspidata var. nana, and Thuja-endophytes sp. 1 (70.0%) in T. koraiensis. However, there was no dominant species growing in A. nephrolepis. Some host plants were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. We obtained 4618 reads for A. nephrolepis and 2268 reads for T. koraiensis. At the genus level, the top three endophytic fungi were Ophiostomataceae_uc (64.6%), Nectriaceae_uc (15.5%), and unclassified organism (18.0%) in A. nephrolepis and Nectriaceae_uc (41.9%), Ophiostomataceae_uc (41.8%), and Magnaporthaceae_uc (9.2%) in T. koraiensis. Our results show that there are different communities of endophytic fungi among different host plants, even if the host plants are in the same region. Such ecological niches are important in terms of the ecological restoration of alpine conifers. Taylor & Francis 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9645271/ /pubmed/36404901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2022.2135832 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Korean Society of Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Eo, Ju-Kyeong
Eom, Ahn-Heum
Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak
title Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak
title_full Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak
title_fullStr Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak
title_full_unstemmed Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak
title_short Community of Endophytic Fungi from Alpine Conifers on Mt. Seorak
title_sort community of endophytic fungi from alpine conifers on mt. seorak
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36404901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2022.2135832
work_keys_str_mv AT eojukyeong communityofendophyticfungifromalpineconifersonmtseorak
AT eomahnheum communityofendophyticfungifromalpineconifersonmtseorak