Cargando…

Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of testing binocular visual acuity using the automated acuity card procedure (AACP)—a new automated method that uses an eye-tracking system. We included participants aged 5 to 36 months old. Binocular grating acuity was tested using the AACP an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Jing, Yang, Bikun, Li, Xiaoqing, Cui, Jinshi, Wang, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.8
_version_ 1784826951277477888
author Wen, Jing
Yang, Bikun
Li, Xiaoqing
Cui, Jinshi
Wang, Li
author_facet Wen, Jing
Yang, Bikun
Li, Xiaoqing
Cui, Jinshi
Wang, Li
author_sort Wen, Jing
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of testing binocular visual acuity using the automated acuity card procedure (AACP)—a new automated method that uses an eye-tracking system. We included participants aged 5 to 36 months old. Binocular grating acuity was tested using the AACP and Teller Acuity Cards (TACs) with a uniform testing distance (55 cm) in random order. Electronic stimuli in the AACP were similar in size and form to TACII and roughly equivalent to the printed TACII stimuli. The AACP tracked the participant's gaze from the recorded image sequences and automatically determined the grating acuity. Differentiation, correlation, and consistency were compared between the AACP and TACs. Ultimately, 77.11% (155/201) of participants completed both tests. Fewer participants failed the TAC test than the AACP (15 [7.46%] vs. 31 [15.42%]). The average duration of the AACP (median interquartile range [IQR] = 60 [IQR = 41] seconds) was significantly shorter than that of the TAC (median [IQR], 185 [IQR = 66] seconds, p < 0.001). AACP and TAC visual acuities were robustly correlated (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots revealed a mean difference between AACP and TAC visual acuities of 0.10 cycles per degree (cpd; 95% limits of agreement = 7.70 cpd). Both the AACP and TACs indicated improved visual acuity with age progression (both, p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the tests. Electronic stimuli were presented using the AACP yielded clinically useful data on grating acuity in infants and toddlers. AACP performance was comparable to that of TACs, the current clinical gold standard for assessing infant vision regarding testability, reliability, and accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9645362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96453622022-11-15 Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system Wen, Jing Yang, Bikun Li, Xiaoqing Cui, Jinshi Wang, Li J Vis Article The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of testing binocular visual acuity using the automated acuity card procedure (AACP)—a new automated method that uses an eye-tracking system. We included participants aged 5 to 36 months old. Binocular grating acuity was tested using the AACP and Teller Acuity Cards (TACs) with a uniform testing distance (55 cm) in random order. Electronic stimuli in the AACP were similar in size and form to TACII and roughly equivalent to the printed TACII stimuli. The AACP tracked the participant's gaze from the recorded image sequences and automatically determined the grating acuity. Differentiation, correlation, and consistency were compared between the AACP and TACs. Ultimately, 77.11% (155/201) of participants completed both tests. Fewer participants failed the TAC test than the AACP (15 [7.46%] vs. 31 [15.42%]). The average duration of the AACP (median interquartile range [IQR] = 60 [IQR = 41] seconds) was significantly shorter than that of the TAC (median [IQR], 185 [IQR = 66] seconds, p < 0.001). AACP and TAC visual acuities were robustly correlated (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots revealed a mean difference between AACP and TAC visual acuities of 0.10 cycles per degree (cpd; 95% limits of agreement = 7.70 cpd). Both the AACP and TACs indicated improved visual acuity with age progression (both, p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the tests. Electronic stimuli were presented using the AACP yielded clinically useful data on grating acuity in infants and toddlers. AACP performance was comparable to that of TACs, the current clinical gold standard for assessing infant vision regarding testability, reliability, and accuracy. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9645362/ /pubmed/36331256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.8 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Wen, Jing
Yang, Bikun
Li, Xiaoqing
Cui, Jinshi
Wang, Li
Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
title Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
title_full Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
title_fullStr Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
title_full_unstemmed Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
title_short Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
title_sort automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36331256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.8
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjing automatedassessmentofgratingacuityininfantsandtoddlersusinganeyetrackingsystem
AT yangbikun automatedassessmentofgratingacuityininfantsandtoddlersusinganeyetrackingsystem
AT lixiaoqing automatedassessmentofgratingacuityininfantsandtoddlersusinganeyetrackingsystem
AT cuijinshi automatedassessmentofgratingacuityininfantsandtoddlersusinganeyetrackingsystem
AT wangli automatedassessmentofgratingacuityininfantsandtoddlersusinganeyetrackingsystem