Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys

Data from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients. OBJECTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anhang Price, Rebecca, Quigley, Denise D., Hargraves, J. Lee, Sorra, Joann, Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U., Hays, Ron D., Cleary, Paul D., Brown, Julie, Elliott, Marc N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784
_version_ 1784826987536187392
author Anhang Price, Rebecca
Quigley, Denise D.
Hargraves, J. Lee
Sorra, Joann
Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U.
Hays, Ron D.
Cleary, Paul D.
Brown, Julie
Elliott, Marc N.
author_facet Anhang Price, Rebecca
Quigley, Denise D.
Hargraves, J. Lee
Sorra, Joann
Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U.
Hays, Ron D.
Cleary, Paul D.
Brown, Julie
Elliott, Marc N.
author_sort Anhang Price, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Data from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients. OBJECTIVE: Review evidence on survey administration strategies to improve response rates and representativeness of patient surveys. RESEARCH DESIGN: Systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Forty peer-reviewed randomized experiments of administration protocols for patient experience surveys. RESULTS: Mail administration with telephone follow-up provides a median response rate benefit of 13% compared with mail-only or telephone-only. While surveys administered only by web typically result in lower response rates than those administered by mail or telephone (median difference in response rate: −21%, range: −44%, 0%), the limited evidence for a sequential web-mail-telephone mode suggests a potential response rate benefit over sequential mail-telephone (median: 4%, range: 2%, 5%). Telephone-only and sequential mixed modes including telephone may yield better representation across patient subgroups by age, insurance type, and race/ethnicity. Monetary incentives are associated with large increases in response rates (median increase: 12%, range: 7%, 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential mixed-mode administration yields higher patient survey response rates than a single mode. Including telephone in sequential mixed-mode administration improves response among those with historically lower response rates; including web in mixed-mode administration may increase response at lower cost. Other promising strategies to improve response rates include in-person survey administration during hospital discharge, incentives, minimizing survey language complexity, and prenotification before survey administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9645551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96455512022-11-14 A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys Anhang Price, Rebecca Quigley, Denise D. Hargraves, J. Lee Sorra, Joann Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U. Hays, Ron D. Cleary, Paul D. Brown, Julie Elliott, Marc N. Med Care Original Articles Data from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients. OBJECTIVE: Review evidence on survey administration strategies to improve response rates and representativeness of patient surveys. RESEARCH DESIGN: Systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Forty peer-reviewed randomized experiments of administration protocols for patient experience surveys. RESULTS: Mail administration with telephone follow-up provides a median response rate benefit of 13% compared with mail-only or telephone-only. While surveys administered only by web typically result in lower response rates than those administered by mail or telephone (median difference in response rate: −21%, range: −44%, 0%), the limited evidence for a sequential web-mail-telephone mode suggests a potential response rate benefit over sequential mail-telephone (median: 4%, range: 2%, 5%). Telephone-only and sequential mixed modes including telephone may yield better representation across patient subgroups by age, insurance type, and race/ethnicity. Monetary incentives are associated with large increases in response rates (median increase: 12%, range: 7%, 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential mixed-mode administration yields higher patient survey response rates than a single mode. Including telephone in sequential mixed-mode administration improves response among those with historically lower response rates; including web in mixed-mode administration may increase response at lower cost. Other promising strategies to improve response rates include in-person survey administration during hospital discharge, incentives, minimizing survey language complexity, and prenotification before survey administration. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9645551/ /pubmed/36260705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Anhang Price, Rebecca
Quigley, Denise D.
Hargraves, J. Lee
Sorra, Joann
Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U.
Hays, Ron D.
Cleary, Paul D.
Brown, Julie
Elliott, Marc N.
A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
title A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
title_full A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
title_short A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
title_sort systematic review of strategies to enhance response rates and representativeness of patient experience surveys
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784
work_keys_str_mv AT anhangpricerebecca asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT quigleydenised asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT hargravesjlee asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT sorrajoann asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT becerraornelasalejandrou asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT haysrond asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT clearypauld asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT brownjulie asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT elliottmarcn asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT anhangpricerebecca systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT quigleydenised systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT hargravesjlee systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT sorrajoann systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT becerraornelasalejandrou systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT haysrond systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT clearypauld systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT brownjulie systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys
AT elliottmarcn systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys