Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys
Data from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients. OBJECTI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784 |
_version_ | 1784826987536187392 |
---|---|
author | Anhang Price, Rebecca Quigley, Denise D. Hargraves, J. Lee Sorra, Joann Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U. Hays, Ron D. Cleary, Paul D. Brown, Julie Elliott, Marc N. |
author_facet | Anhang Price, Rebecca Quigley, Denise D. Hargraves, J. Lee Sorra, Joann Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U. Hays, Ron D. Cleary, Paul D. Brown, Julie Elliott, Marc N. |
author_sort | Anhang Price, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients. OBJECTIVE: Review evidence on survey administration strategies to improve response rates and representativeness of patient surveys. RESEARCH DESIGN: Systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Forty peer-reviewed randomized experiments of administration protocols for patient experience surveys. RESULTS: Mail administration with telephone follow-up provides a median response rate benefit of 13% compared with mail-only or telephone-only. While surveys administered only by web typically result in lower response rates than those administered by mail or telephone (median difference in response rate: −21%, range: −44%, 0%), the limited evidence for a sequential web-mail-telephone mode suggests a potential response rate benefit over sequential mail-telephone (median: 4%, range: 2%, 5%). Telephone-only and sequential mixed modes including telephone may yield better representation across patient subgroups by age, insurance type, and race/ethnicity. Monetary incentives are associated with large increases in response rates (median increase: 12%, range: 7%, 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential mixed-mode administration yields higher patient survey response rates than a single mode. Including telephone in sequential mixed-mode administration improves response among those with historically lower response rates; including web in mixed-mode administration may increase response at lower cost. Other promising strategies to improve response rates include in-person survey administration during hospital discharge, incentives, minimizing survey language complexity, and prenotification before survey administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9645551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96455512022-11-14 A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys Anhang Price, Rebecca Quigley, Denise D. Hargraves, J. Lee Sorra, Joann Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U. Hays, Ron D. Cleary, Paul D. Brown, Julie Elliott, Marc N. Med Care Original Articles Data from surveys of patient care experiences are a cornerstone of public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about survey response rates and how to promote equity by ensuring that responses represent the perspectives of all patients. OBJECTIVE: Review evidence on survey administration strategies to improve response rates and representativeness of patient surveys. RESEARCH DESIGN: Systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Forty peer-reviewed randomized experiments of administration protocols for patient experience surveys. RESULTS: Mail administration with telephone follow-up provides a median response rate benefit of 13% compared with mail-only or telephone-only. While surveys administered only by web typically result in lower response rates than those administered by mail or telephone (median difference in response rate: −21%, range: −44%, 0%), the limited evidence for a sequential web-mail-telephone mode suggests a potential response rate benefit over sequential mail-telephone (median: 4%, range: 2%, 5%). Telephone-only and sequential mixed modes including telephone may yield better representation across patient subgroups by age, insurance type, and race/ethnicity. Monetary incentives are associated with large increases in response rates (median increase: 12%, range: 7%, 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential mixed-mode administration yields higher patient survey response rates than a single mode. Including telephone in sequential mixed-mode administration improves response among those with historically lower response rates; including web in mixed-mode administration may increase response at lower cost. Other promising strategies to improve response rates include in-person survey administration during hospital discharge, incentives, minimizing survey language complexity, and prenotification before survey administration. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9645551/ /pubmed/36260705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Anhang Price, Rebecca Quigley, Denise D. Hargraves, J. Lee Sorra, Joann Becerra-Ornelas, Alejandro U. Hays, Ron D. Cleary, Paul D. Brown, Julie Elliott, Marc N. A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys |
title | A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys |
title_sort | systematic review of strategies to enhance response rates and representativeness of patient experience surveys |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anhangpricerebecca asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT quigleydenised asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT hargravesjlee asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT sorrajoann asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT becerraornelasalejandrou asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT haysrond asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT clearypauld asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT brownjulie asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT elliottmarcn asystematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT anhangpricerebecca systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT quigleydenised systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT hargravesjlee systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT sorrajoann systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT becerraornelasalejandrou systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT haysrond systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT clearypauld systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT brownjulie systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys AT elliottmarcn systematicreviewofstrategiestoenhanceresponseratesandrepresentativenessofpatientexperiencesurveys |