Cargando…
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
Strong prognostic biomarkers are lacking regarding the stratification of treatment and surveillance regimens in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in plasma (suPAR) compared to evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21175-7 |
_version_ | 1784827023496052736 |
---|---|
author | Risør, Louise Madeleine Binderup, Tina Fosbøl, Marie Øbro Andersen, Kim Francis Loft, Annika Friborg, Jeppe Kjaer, Andreas |
author_facet | Risør, Louise Madeleine Binderup, Tina Fosbøl, Marie Øbro Andersen, Kim Francis Loft, Annika Friborg, Jeppe Kjaer, Andreas |
author_sort | Risør, Louise Madeleine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Strong prognostic biomarkers are lacking regarding the stratification of treatment and surveillance regimens in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in plasma (suPAR) compared to evaluation by uPAR-positron-emission-tomography (PET) in HNSCC patients. Plasma from 19 controls and 49 HNSCC patients referred to curatively intended radiotherapy (2017–2021) was collected pre-treatment and post-treatment (n = 37). Information on uPAR-PET was available from previous evaluation. Patient median suPAR was significantly higher pre- and post-treatment compared to controls (p = 0.013, p = 0.003) and increased significantly during radiotherapy (p = 0.003). Pre-treatment suPAR did not predict survival outcomes. Post-treatment suPAR significantly predicted RFS (HR = 6.67 (95% CI 1.44–30.9) p = 0.015), but not OS (HR = 3.29 (95% CI 0.882–12.3) p = 0.076) in univariate analysis. RFS prediction was maintained for post-treatment suPAR in multivariate analysis, including TNM-stage (HR = 6.62 (95% CI 1.40–31.4) p = 0.017). Pre-treatment uPAR-PET/CT and post-treatment suPAR was available in 24 patients. High uPAR-estimates on both modalities was significantly associated with poor RFS compared to patients with low uPAR-estimates (log-rank, p = 0.008). Patients with discordant uPAR-estimates (one-low/one-high) were at intermediate risk, although non-significant (p = 0.131). In conclusion, pre-treatment suPAR did not predict RFS or OS. Pre-treatment uPAR-PET and post-treatment suPAR predicted RFS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9645757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96457572022-11-14 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients Risør, Louise Madeleine Binderup, Tina Fosbøl, Marie Øbro Andersen, Kim Francis Loft, Annika Friborg, Jeppe Kjaer, Andreas Sci Rep Article Strong prognostic biomarkers are lacking regarding the stratification of treatment and surveillance regimens in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in plasma (suPAR) compared to evaluation by uPAR-positron-emission-tomography (PET) in HNSCC patients. Plasma from 19 controls and 49 HNSCC patients referred to curatively intended radiotherapy (2017–2021) was collected pre-treatment and post-treatment (n = 37). Information on uPAR-PET was available from previous evaluation. Patient median suPAR was significantly higher pre- and post-treatment compared to controls (p = 0.013, p = 0.003) and increased significantly during radiotherapy (p = 0.003). Pre-treatment suPAR did not predict survival outcomes. Post-treatment suPAR significantly predicted RFS (HR = 6.67 (95% CI 1.44–30.9) p = 0.015), but not OS (HR = 3.29 (95% CI 0.882–12.3) p = 0.076) in univariate analysis. RFS prediction was maintained for post-treatment suPAR in multivariate analysis, including TNM-stage (HR = 6.62 (95% CI 1.40–31.4) p = 0.017). Pre-treatment uPAR-PET/CT and post-treatment suPAR was available in 24 patients. High uPAR-estimates on both modalities was significantly associated with poor RFS compared to patients with low uPAR-estimates (log-rank, p = 0.008). Patients with discordant uPAR-estimates (one-low/one-high) were at intermediate risk, although non-significant (p = 0.131). In conclusion, pre-treatment suPAR did not predict RFS or OS. Pre-treatment uPAR-PET and post-treatment suPAR predicted RFS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9645757/ /pubmed/36352036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21175-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Risør, Louise Madeleine Binderup, Tina Fosbøl, Marie Øbro Andersen, Kim Francis Loft, Annika Friborg, Jeppe Kjaer, Andreas Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
title | Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
title_full | Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
title_short | Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
title_sort | urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (upar) assessed by liquid biopsies and pet/ct for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21175-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT risørlouisemadeleine urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients AT binderuptina urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients AT fosbølmarieøbro urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients AT andersenkimfrancis urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients AT loftannika urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients AT friborgjeppe urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients AT kjaerandreas urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients |