Cargando…

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients

Strong prognostic biomarkers are lacking regarding the stratification of treatment and surveillance regimens in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in plasma (suPAR) compared to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Risør, Louise Madeleine, Binderup, Tina, Fosbøl, Marie Øbro, Andersen, Kim Francis, Loft, Annika, Friborg, Jeppe, Kjaer, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21175-7
_version_ 1784827023496052736
author Risør, Louise Madeleine
Binderup, Tina
Fosbøl, Marie Øbro
Andersen, Kim Francis
Loft, Annika
Friborg, Jeppe
Kjaer, Andreas
author_facet Risør, Louise Madeleine
Binderup, Tina
Fosbøl, Marie Øbro
Andersen, Kim Francis
Loft, Annika
Friborg, Jeppe
Kjaer, Andreas
author_sort Risør, Louise Madeleine
collection PubMed
description Strong prognostic biomarkers are lacking regarding the stratification of treatment and surveillance regimens in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in plasma (suPAR) compared to evaluation by uPAR-positron-emission-tomography (PET) in HNSCC patients. Plasma from 19 controls and 49 HNSCC patients referred to curatively intended radiotherapy (2017–2021) was collected pre-treatment and post-treatment (n = 37). Information on uPAR-PET was available from previous evaluation. Patient median suPAR was significantly higher pre- and post-treatment compared to controls (p = 0.013, p = 0.003) and increased significantly during radiotherapy (p = 0.003). Pre-treatment suPAR did not predict survival outcomes. Post-treatment suPAR significantly predicted RFS (HR = 6.67 (95% CI 1.44–30.9) p = 0.015), but not OS (HR = 3.29 (95% CI 0.882–12.3) p = 0.076) in univariate analysis. RFS prediction was maintained for post-treatment suPAR in multivariate analysis, including TNM-stage (HR = 6.62 (95% CI 1.40–31.4) p = 0.017). Pre-treatment uPAR-PET/CT and post-treatment suPAR was available in 24 patients. High uPAR-estimates on both modalities was significantly associated with poor RFS compared to patients with low uPAR-estimates (log-rank, p = 0.008). Patients with discordant uPAR-estimates (one-low/one-high) were at intermediate risk, although non-significant (p = 0.131). In conclusion, pre-treatment suPAR did not predict RFS or OS. Pre-treatment uPAR-PET and post-treatment suPAR predicted RFS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9645757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96457572022-11-14 Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients Risør, Louise Madeleine Binderup, Tina Fosbøl, Marie Øbro Andersen, Kim Francis Loft, Annika Friborg, Jeppe Kjaer, Andreas Sci Rep Article Strong prognostic biomarkers are lacking regarding the stratification of treatment and surveillance regimens in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in plasma (suPAR) compared to evaluation by uPAR-positron-emission-tomography (PET) in HNSCC patients. Plasma from 19 controls and 49 HNSCC patients referred to curatively intended radiotherapy (2017–2021) was collected pre-treatment and post-treatment (n = 37). Information on uPAR-PET was available from previous evaluation. Patient median suPAR was significantly higher pre- and post-treatment compared to controls (p = 0.013, p = 0.003) and increased significantly during radiotherapy (p = 0.003). Pre-treatment suPAR did not predict survival outcomes. Post-treatment suPAR significantly predicted RFS (HR = 6.67 (95% CI 1.44–30.9) p = 0.015), but not OS (HR = 3.29 (95% CI 0.882–12.3) p = 0.076) in univariate analysis. RFS prediction was maintained for post-treatment suPAR in multivariate analysis, including TNM-stage (HR = 6.62 (95% CI 1.40–31.4) p = 0.017). Pre-treatment uPAR-PET/CT and post-treatment suPAR was available in 24 patients. High uPAR-estimates on both modalities was significantly associated with poor RFS compared to patients with low uPAR-estimates (log-rank, p = 0.008). Patients with discordant uPAR-estimates (one-low/one-high) were at intermediate risk, although non-significant (p = 0.131). In conclusion, pre-treatment suPAR did not predict RFS or OS. Pre-treatment uPAR-PET and post-treatment suPAR predicted RFS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9645757/ /pubmed/36352036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21175-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Risør, Louise Madeleine
Binderup, Tina
Fosbøl, Marie Øbro
Andersen, Kim Francis
Loft, Annika
Friborg, Jeppe
Kjaer, Andreas
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
title Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
title_full Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
title_fullStr Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
title_short Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) assessed by liquid biopsies and PET/CT for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
title_sort urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (upar) assessed by liquid biopsies and pet/ct for prognostication in head and neck cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21175-7
work_keys_str_mv AT risørlouisemadeleine urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT binderuptina urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT fosbølmarieøbro urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT andersenkimfrancis urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT loftannika urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT friborgjeppe urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT kjaerandreas urokinasetypeplasminogenactivatorreceptoruparassessedbyliquidbiopsiesandpetctforprognosticationinheadandneckcancerpatients