Cargando…

Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle. This was a single-center retrospective study. Fourteen patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a 22-gauge f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takahashi, Koji, Ohyama, Hiroshi, Ouchi, Mayu, Kan, Motoyasu, Nagashima, Hiroki, Iino, Yotaro, Kusakabe, Yuko, Okitsu, Kohichiroh, Ohno, Izumi, Takiguchi, Yuichi, Kato, Naoya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031545
_version_ 1784827182308130816
author Takahashi, Koji
Ohyama, Hiroshi
Ouchi, Mayu
Kan, Motoyasu
Nagashima, Hiroki
Iino, Yotaro
Kusakabe, Yuko
Okitsu, Kohichiroh
Ohno, Izumi
Takiguchi, Yuichi
Kato, Naoya
author_facet Takahashi, Koji
Ohyama, Hiroshi
Ouchi, Mayu
Kan, Motoyasu
Nagashima, Hiroki
Iino, Yotaro
Kusakabe, Yuko
Okitsu, Kohichiroh
Ohno, Izumi
Takiguchi, Yuichi
Kato, Naoya
author_sort Takahashi, Koji
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle. This was a single-center retrospective study. Fourteen patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle were examined. Fourteen eligible patients were included in this study. The age of patients ranged from 55 to 93 years, with a median of 76 years. Of patients with existing underlying diseases, there were 8 cases of pancreatic cancer (57.1%), 2 cases of metastatic liver tumor (14.3%), 2 cases of bile duct stones (14.3%), 1 case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (7.1%), and 1 case of gallbladder cancer (7.1%). Regarding gastrointestinal anatomy, there were 11 cases (78.6%) of normal and 3 cases (21.4%) of gastric resection with Roux-en-Y. Reasons for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy were duodenal obstruction in 7 cases (50.0%), surgically altered anatomy in 3 cases (21.4%), and 4 cases (28.6%) of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Technical success was achieved in 11 cases (78.6%). Subsequently, 11 cases of technical success were analyzed. There were 5 cases of puncturing B2 (45.5%). The puncture bile duct diameter ranged from 3.1 to 5.7 mm, with a median of 4.4 mm. endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade procedures was combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in 2 cases (18.2%). Clinical success was achieved in all the cases. The procedure time ranged from 15 to 93 minutes, with a median duration of 35 minutes. Regarding the type of stent placed in hepaticogastrostomy, a plastic stent was placed in 10 cases (90.9%) and a metal stent was placed in 1 case (9.1%). Early adverse events occurred in 4 cases (36.4%), and all of these cases developed biliary peritonitis, late adverse events occurred in 1 case (9.1%), this was biloma. A change to a 0.025-inch guidewire during the procedure was required in 8 cases (72.7%). Esophageal puncture was not performed. endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle is effective. However, in 72.7% of the cases started using the 0.018-inch guidewire, the guidewire was exchanged for a 0.025-inch guidewire during procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9646514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96465142022-11-14 Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle Takahashi, Koji Ohyama, Hiroshi Ouchi, Mayu Kan, Motoyasu Nagashima, Hiroki Iino, Yotaro Kusakabe, Yuko Okitsu, Kohichiroh Ohno, Izumi Takiguchi, Yuichi Kato, Naoya Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle. This was a single-center retrospective study. Fourteen patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle were examined. Fourteen eligible patients were included in this study. The age of patients ranged from 55 to 93 years, with a median of 76 years. Of patients with existing underlying diseases, there were 8 cases of pancreatic cancer (57.1%), 2 cases of metastatic liver tumor (14.3%), 2 cases of bile duct stones (14.3%), 1 case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (7.1%), and 1 case of gallbladder cancer (7.1%). Regarding gastrointestinal anatomy, there were 11 cases (78.6%) of normal and 3 cases (21.4%) of gastric resection with Roux-en-Y. Reasons for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy were duodenal obstruction in 7 cases (50.0%), surgically altered anatomy in 3 cases (21.4%), and 4 cases (28.6%) of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Technical success was achieved in 11 cases (78.6%). Subsequently, 11 cases of technical success were analyzed. There were 5 cases of puncturing B2 (45.5%). The puncture bile duct diameter ranged from 3.1 to 5.7 mm, with a median of 4.4 mm. endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade procedures was combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in 2 cases (18.2%). Clinical success was achieved in all the cases. The procedure time ranged from 15 to 93 minutes, with a median duration of 35 minutes. Regarding the type of stent placed in hepaticogastrostomy, a plastic stent was placed in 10 cases (90.9%) and a metal stent was placed in 1 case (9.1%). Early adverse events occurred in 4 cases (36.4%), and all of these cases developed biliary peritonitis, late adverse events occurred in 1 case (9.1%), this was biloma. A change to a 0.025-inch guidewire during the procedure was required in 8 cases (72.7%). Esophageal puncture was not performed. endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle is effective. However, in 72.7% of the cases started using the 0.018-inch guidewire, the guidewire was exchanged for a 0.025-inch guidewire during procedure. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9646514/ /pubmed/36343043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031545 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 4500
Takahashi, Koji
Ohyama, Hiroshi
Ouchi, Mayu
Kan, Motoyasu
Nagashima, Hiroki
Iino, Yotaro
Kusakabe, Yuko
Okitsu, Kohichiroh
Ohno, Izumi
Takiguchi, Yuichi
Kato, Naoya
Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
title Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
title_full Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
title_fullStr Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
title_short Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
title_sort feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031545
work_keys_str_mv AT takahashikoji feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT ohyamahiroshi feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT ouchimayu feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT kanmotoyasu feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT nagashimahiroki feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT iinoyotaro feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT kusakabeyuko feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT okitsukohichiroh feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT ohnoizumi feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT takiguchiyuichi feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle
AT katonaoya feasibilityofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyusinga22gaugeneedle