Cargando…

Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Scalp acupuncture (SA) is a new acupuncture method that connects head acupoints and aculines, and many systematic reviews (SRs) have been published on its use against neuropsychiatric diseases. However, no overview of SRs on the effectiveness of SA in stroke recovery has been conducted. Therefore, o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sun-Young, Kim, Hyun-Tae, Heo, In, Hwang, Man-Suk, Hwang, Eui-Hyoung, Shin, Byung-Cheul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031472
_version_ 1784827195652308992
author Park, Sun-Young
Kim, Hyun-Tae
Heo, In
Hwang, Man-Suk
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
Shin, Byung-Cheul
author_facet Park, Sun-Young
Kim, Hyun-Tae
Heo, In
Hwang, Man-Suk
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
Shin, Byung-Cheul
author_sort Park, Sun-Young
collection PubMed
description Scalp acupuncture (SA) is a new acupuncture method that connects head acupoints and aculines, and many systematic reviews (SRs) have been published on its use against neuropsychiatric diseases. However, no overview of SRs on the effectiveness of SA in stroke recovery has been conducted. Therefore, our overview aims to evaluate the methodological bias and reliability of the conclusions of SRs regarding SA for stroke recovery and help clinical decision-makers translate this research into clinical policy and practice. METHODS: We will consider SRs and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of SA on stroke recovery. Two reviewers will identify relevant studies, extract data information, and assess the methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses report checklist will also be included in the study to assess the quality of the reports. We will use evaluations of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation of the authors of the included SRs. The Risk of Bias in Systematic Review tool will be used to assess the risk of bias of SRs. The screening of SRs, eligibility evaluation, data extraction, methodological quality, and quality of evidence will be conducted by independent reviewers in pairs. The outcomes of interest include the Modified Edinburgh–Scandinavian Stroke Scale, Ability of Daily Living, Functional Independence Measure, Barthel index, Fugl–Meyer assessment, clinical effective rate, and adverse events. Data will be extracted using predefined forms designed to summarize the important characteristics of each review. The evidence will be a descriptive synthesis of the type and content of the intervention and the results reported. RESULTS: The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: We expect to organize evidence from multiple SRs on the effectiveness of SA for stroke recovery and synthesize the findings in an accessible and useful documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9646568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96465682022-11-14 Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis Park, Sun-Young Kim, Hyun-Tae Heo, In Hwang, Man-Suk Hwang, Eui-Hyoung Shin, Byung-Cheul Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 Scalp acupuncture (SA) is a new acupuncture method that connects head acupoints and aculines, and many systematic reviews (SRs) have been published on its use against neuropsychiatric diseases. However, no overview of SRs on the effectiveness of SA in stroke recovery has been conducted. Therefore, our overview aims to evaluate the methodological bias and reliability of the conclusions of SRs regarding SA for stroke recovery and help clinical decision-makers translate this research into clinical policy and practice. METHODS: We will consider SRs and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of SA on stroke recovery. Two reviewers will identify relevant studies, extract data information, and assess the methodological quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses report checklist will also be included in the study to assess the quality of the reports. We will use evaluations of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation of the authors of the included SRs. The Risk of Bias in Systematic Review tool will be used to assess the risk of bias of SRs. The screening of SRs, eligibility evaluation, data extraction, methodological quality, and quality of evidence will be conducted by independent reviewers in pairs. The outcomes of interest include the Modified Edinburgh–Scandinavian Stroke Scale, Ability of Daily Living, Functional Independence Measure, Barthel index, Fugl–Meyer assessment, clinical effective rate, and adverse events. Data will be extracted using predefined forms designed to summarize the important characteristics of each review. The evidence will be a descriptive synthesis of the type and content of the intervention and the results reported. RESULTS: The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: We expect to organize evidence from multiple SRs on the effectiveness of SA for stroke recovery and synthesize the findings in an accessible and useful documentation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9646568/ /pubmed/36343045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031472 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 3800
Park, Sun-Young
Kim, Hyun-Tae
Heo, In
Hwang, Man-Suk
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
Shin, Byung-Cheul
Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
title Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
title_full Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
title_short Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
title_sort scalp acupuncture for stroke: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36343045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031472
work_keys_str_mv AT parksunyoung scalpacupunctureforstrokeaprotocolforanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysis
AT kimhyuntae scalpacupunctureforstrokeaprotocolforanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysis
AT heoin scalpacupunctureforstrokeaprotocolforanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysis
AT hwangmansuk scalpacupunctureforstrokeaprotocolforanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysis
AT hwangeuihyoung scalpacupunctureforstrokeaprotocolforanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysis
AT shinbyungcheul scalpacupunctureforstrokeaprotocolforanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysis