Cargando…

Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND: Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eng, L., Brual, J., Nagee, A., Mok, S., Fazelzad, R., Chaiton, M., Saunders, D.P., Mittmann, N., Truscott, R., Liu, G., Bradbury, P.A., Evans, W.K., Papadakos, J., Giuliani, M.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36356412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100605
_version_ 1784827220541308928
author Eng, L.
Brual, J.
Nagee, A.
Mok, S.
Fazelzad, R.
Chaiton, M.
Saunders, D.P.
Mittmann, N.
Truscott, R.
Liu, G.
Bradbury, P.A.
Evans, W.K.
Papadakos, J.
Giuliani, M.E.
author_facet Eng, L.
Brual, J.
Nagee, A.
Mok, S.
Fazelzad, R.
Chaiton, M.
Saunders, D.P.
Mittmann, N.
Truscott, R.
Liu, G.
Bradbury, P.A.
Evans, W.K.
Papadakos, J.
Giuliani, M.E.
author_sort Eng, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life. RESULTS: A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants’ tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9646674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96466742022-11-15 Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review Eng, L. Brual, J. Nagee, A. Mok, S. Fazelzad, R. Chaiton, M. Saunders, D.P. Mittmann, N. Truscott, R. Liu, G. Bradbury, P.A. Evans, W.K. Papadakos, J. Giuliani, M.E. ESMO Open Review BACKGROUND: Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life. RESULTS: A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants’ tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies. Elsevier 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9646674/ /pubmed/36356412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100605 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Eng, L.
Brual, J.
Nagee, A.
Mok, S.
Fazelzad, R.
Chaiton, M.
Saunders, D.P.
Mittmann, N.
Truscott, R.
Liu, G.
Bradbury, P.A.
Evans, W.K.
Papadakos, J.
Giuliani, M.E.
Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
title Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
title_full Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
title_short Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
title_sort reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36356412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100605
work_keys_str_mv AT engl reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT brualj reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT nageea reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT moks reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT fazelzadr reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT chaitonm reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT saundersdp reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT mittmannn reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT truscottr reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT liug reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT bradburypa reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT evanswk reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT papadakosj reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview
AT giulianime reportingoftobaccouseandtobaccorelatedanalysesincancercooperativegroupclinicaltrialsasystematicscopingreview