Cargando…

Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics

Button-press measures of response time (RT) and accuracy have long served a central role in psychological research. However, RT and accuracy provide limited insight into how cognitive processes unfold over time. To address this limitation, researchers have used hand-tracking techniques to investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Katie Ann, Morrison, Samara, Henderson, Annette M. E., Erb, Christopher D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20579-9
_version_ 1784827246813380608
author Smith, Katie Ann
Morrison, Samara
Henderson, Annette M. E.
Erb, Christopher D.
author_facet Smith, Katie Ann
Morrison, Samara
Henderson, Annette M. E.
Erb, Christopher D.
author_sort Smith, Katie Ann
collection PubMed
description Button-press measures of response time (RT) and accuracy have long served a central role in psychological research. However, RT and accuracy provide limited insight into how cognitive processes unfold over time. To address this limitation, researchers have used hand-tracking techniques to investigate how cognitive processes unfold over the course of a response, are modulated by recent experience, and function across the lifespan. Despite the efficacy of these techniques for investigating a wide range of psychological phenomena, widespread adoption of hand-tracking techniques within the field is hindered by a range of factors, including equipment costs and the use of specialized software. Here, we demonstrate that the behavioral dynamics previously observed with specialized motion-tracking equipment in an Eriksen flanker task can be captured with an affordable, portable, and easy-to-assemble response box. Six-to-eight-year-olds and adults (N = 90) completed a computerized version of the flanker task by pressing and holding a central button until a stimulus array appeared. Participants then responded by releasing the central button and reaching to press one of two response buttons. This method allowed RT to be separated into initiation time (when the central button was released) and movement time (time elapsed between initiation and completion of the response). Consistent with previous research using motion-tracking techniques, initiation times and movement times revealed distinct patterns of effects across trials and between age groups, indicating that the method used in the current study presents a simple solution for researchers from across the psychological and brain sciences looking to move beyond RTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9646795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96467952022-11-15 Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics Smith, Katie Ann Morrison, Samara Henderson, Annette M. E. Erb, Christopher D. Sci Rep Article Button-press measures of response time (RT) and accuracy have long served a central role in psychological research. However, RT and accuracy provide limited insight into how cognitive processes unfold over time. To address this limitation, researchers have used hand-tracking techniques to investigate how cognitive processes unfold over the course of a response, are modulated by recent experience, and function across the lifespan. Despite the efficacy of these techniques for investigating a wide range of psychological phenomena, widespread adoption of hand-tracking techniques within the field is hindered by a range of factors, including equipment costs and the use of specialized software. Here, we demonstrate that the behavioral dynamics previously observed with specialized motion-tracking equipment in an Eriksen flanker task can be captured with an affordable, portable, and easy-to-assemble response box. Six-to-eight-year-olds and adults (N = 90) completed a computerized version of the flanker task by pressing and holding a central button until a stimulus array appeared. Participants then responded by releasing the central button and reaching to press one of two response buttons. This method allowed RT to be separated into initiation time (when the central button was released) and movement time (time elapsed between initiation and completion of the response). Consistent with previous research using motion-tracking techniques, initiation times and movement times revealed distinct patterns of effects across trials and between age groups, indicating that the method used in the current study presents a simple solution for researchers from across the psychological and brain sciences looking to move beyond RTs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9646795/ /pubmed/36351962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20579-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Katie Ann
Morrison, Samara
Henderson, Annette M. E.
Erb, Christopher D.
Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
title Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
title_full Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
title_fullStr Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
title_short Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
title_sort moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20579-9
work_keys_str_mv AT smithkatieann movingbeyondresponsetimeswithaccessiblemeasuresofmanualdynamics
AT morrisonsamara movingbeyondresponsetimeswithaccessiblemeasuresofmanualdynamics
AT hendersonannetteme movingbeyondresponsetimeswithaccessiblemeasuresofmanualdynamics
AT erbchristopherd movingbeyondresponsetimeswithaccessiblemeasuresofmanualdynamics