Cargando…

Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis

The Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT) project is intended to provide new insights into the relevant utility attributes regarding therapy choices for malignant primary and secondary liver tumors from the perspective of those who are involved in the decision-mak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hensen, Bennet, Winkelmann, Carolin, Wacker, Frank K., Vogt, Bodo, Dewald, Cornelia L. A., Neumann, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23097-w
_version_ 1784827248559259648
author Hensen, Bennet
Winkelmann, Carolin
Wacker, Frank K.
Vogt, Bodo
Dewald, Cornelia L. A.
Neumann, Thomas
author_facet Hensen, Bennet
Winkelmann, Carolin
Wacker, Frank K.
Vogt, Bodo
Dewald, Cornelia L. A.
Neumann, Thomas
author_sort Hensen, Bennet
collection PubMed
description The Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT) project is intended to provide new insights into the relevant utility attributes regarding therapy choices for malignant primary and secondary liver tumors from the perspective of those who are involved in the decision-making process. It addresses the potential value of taking patients’ expectations and preferences into account during the decision-making and, when possible, adapting therapies according to these preferences. Specifically, it is intended to identify the relevant clinical attributes that influence the patients’, medical laymen’s, and medical professionals’ decisions and compare the three groups’ preferences. We conducted maximum difference (MaxDiff) scaling among 261 participants (75 physicians, 97 patients with hepatic malignancies, and 89 medical laymen) to rank the importance of 14 attributes previously identified through a literature review. We evaluated the MaxDiff data using count analysis and hierarchical Bayes estimation (HB). Physicians, patients, and medical laymen assessed the same 7 attributes as the most important: probability (certainty) of a complete removal of the tumor, probability of reoccurrence of the disease, pathological evidence of tumor removal, possible complications during the medical intervention, welfare after the medical intervention, duration and intensity of the pain, and degree of difficulty of the medical intervention. The cumulative relative importance of these 7 attributes was 88.3%. Our results show that the physicians’, patients’, and medical laymen’s preferences were very similar and stable. Trial registration DRKS-ID of the study: DRKS00013304, Date of Registration in DRKS: 2017/11/16.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9646805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96468052022-11-15 Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis Hensen, Bennet Winkelmann, Carolin Wacker, Frank K. Vogt, Bodo Dewald, Cornelia L. A. Neumann, Thomas Sci Rep Article The Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT) project is intended to provide new insights into the relevant utility attributes regarding therapy choices for malignant primary and secondary liver tumors from the perspective of those who are involved in the decision-making process. It addresses the potential value of taking patients’ expectations and preferences into account during the decision-making and, when possible, adapting therapies according to these preferences. Specifically, it is intended to identify the relevant clinical attributes that influence the patients’, medical laymen’s, and medical professionals’ decisions and compare the three groups’ preferences. We conducted maximum difference (MaxDiff) scaling among 261 participants (75 physicians, 97 patients with hepatic malignancies, and 89 medical laymen) to rank the importance of 14 attributes previously identified through a literature review. We evaluated the MaxDiff data using count analysis and hierarchical Bayes estimation (HB). Physicians, patients, and medical laymen assessed the same 7 attributes as the most important: probability (certainty) of a complete removal of the tumor, probability of reoccurrence of the disease, pathological evidence of tumor removal, possible complications during the medical intervention, welfare after the medical intervention, duration and intensity of the pain, and degree of difficulty of the medical intervention. The cumulative relative importance of these 7 attributes was 88.3%. Our results show that the physicians’, patients’, and medical laymen’s preferences were very similar and stable. Trial registration DRKS-ID of the study: DRKS00013304, Date of Registration in DRKS: 2017/11/16. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9646805/ /pubmed/36351993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23097-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hensen, Bennet
Winkelmann, Carolin
Wacker, Frank K.
Vogt, Bodo
Dewald, Cornelia L. A.
Neumann, Thomas
Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
title Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
title_full Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
title_fullStr Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
title_short Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
title_sort identification of relevant attributes for liver cancer therapies (iralct): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23097-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hensenbennet identificationofrelevantattributesforlivercancertherapiesiralctamaximumdifferencescalinganalysis
AT winkelmanncarolin identificationofrelevantattributesforlivercancertherapiesiralctamaximumdifferencescalinganalysis
AT wackerfrankk identificationofrelevantattributesforlivercancertherapiesiralctamaximumdifferencescalinganalysis
AT vogtbodo identificationofrelevantattributesforlivercancertherapiesiralctamaximumdifferencescalinganalysis
AT dewaldcorneliala identificationofrelevantattributesforlivercancertherapiesiralctamaximumdifferencescalinganalysis
AT neumannthomas identificationofrelevantattributesforlivercancertherapiesiralctamaximumdifferencescalinganalysis