Cargando…
Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography
Artificial intelligence (AI) is limited to teeth and periodontal disease in the dental field, and is used for diagnosis assistance or data analysis, and there has been no research conducted in actual clinical situations. So, we created an environment similar to actual clinical practice and conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22595-1 |
_version_ | 1784827249519755264 |
---|---|
author | Song, Yool Bin Jeong, Ho-Gul Kim, Changgyun Kim, Donghyun Kim, Jaeyeon Kim, Hyung Jun Park, Wonse |
author_facet | Song, Yool Bin Jeong, Ho-Gul Kim, Changgyun Kim, Donghyun Kim, Jaeyeon Kim, Hyung Jun Park, Wonse |
author_sort | Song, Yool Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence (AI) is limited to teeth and periodontal disease in the dental field, and is used for diagnosis assistance or data analysis, and there has been no research conducted in actual clinical situations. So, we created an environment similar to actual clinical practice and conducted research by selecting three of the soft tissue diseases (carotid artery calcification, lymph node calcification, and sialolith) that are difficult for general dentists to see. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and reading time are evaluated using panoramic images and AI. A total of 20,000 panoramic images including three diseases were used to develop and train a fast R-CNN model. To compare the performance of the developed model, two oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMRs) and two general dentists (GDs) read 352 images, excluding the panoramic images used in development for soft tissue calcification diagnosis. On the first visit, the observers read images without AI; on the second visit, the same observers used AI to read the same image. The diagnostic accuracy and specificity for soft tissue calcification of AI were high from 0.727 to 0.926 and from 0.171 to 1.000, whereas the sensitivity for lymph node calcification and sialolith were low at 0.250 and 0.188, respectively. The reading time of AI increased in the GD group (619 to 1049) and decreased in the OMR group (1347 to 1372). In addition, reading scores increased in both groups (GD from 11.4 to 39.8 and OMR from 3.4 to 10.8). Using AI, although the detection sensitivity of sialolith and lymph node calcification was lower than that of carotid artery calcification, the total reading time of the OMR specialists was reduced and the GDs reading accuracy was improved. The AI used in this study helped to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the GD group, who were not familiar with the soft tissue calcification diagnosis, but more data sets are needed to improve the detection performance of the two diseases with low sensitivity of AI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9646809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96468092022-11-15 Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography Song, Yool Bin Jeong, Ho-Gul Kim, Changgyun Kim, Donghyun Kim, Jaeyeon Kim, Hyung Jun Park, Wonse Sci Rep Article Artificial intelligence (AI) is limited to teeth and periodontal disease in the dental field, and is used for diagnosis assistance or data analysis, and there has been no research conducted in actual clinical situations. So, we created an environment similar to actual clinical practice and conducted research by selecting three of the soft tissue diseases (carotid artery calcification, lymph node calcification, and sialolith) that are difficult for general dentists to see. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and reading time are evaluated using panoramic images and AI. A total of 20,000 panoramic images including three diseases were used to develop and train a fast R-CNN model. To compare the performance of the developed model, two oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMRs) and two general dentists (GDs) read 352 images, excluding the panoramic images used in development for soft tissue calcification diagnosis. On the first visit, the observers read images without AI; on the second visit, the same observers used AI to read the same image. The diagnostic accuracy and specificity for soft tissue calcification of AI were high from 0.727 to 0.926 and from 0.171 to 1.000, whereas the sensitivity for lymph node calcification and sialolith were low at 0.250 and 0.188, respectively. The reading time of AI increased in the GD group (619 to 1049) and decreased in the OMR group (1347 to 1372). In addition, reading scores increased in both groups (GD from 11.4 to 39.8 and OMR from 3.4 to 10.8). Using AI, although the detection sensitivity of sialolith and lymph node calcification was lower than that of carotid artery calcification, the total reading time of the OMR specialists was reduced and the GDs reading accuracy was improved. The AI used in this study helped to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the GD group, who were not familiar with the soft tissue calcification diagnosis, but more data sets are needed to improve the detection performance of the two diseases with low sensitivity of AI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9646809/ /pubmed/36352043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22595-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Song, Yool Bin Jeong, Ho-Gul Kim, Changgyun Kim, Donghyun Kim, Jaeyeon Kim, Hyung Jun Park, Wonse Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
title | Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
title_full | Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
title_fullStr | Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
title_short | Comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
title_sort | comparison of detection performance of soft tissue calcifications using artificial intelligence in panoramic radiography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22595-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songyoolbin comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography AT jeonghogul comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography AT kimchanggyun comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography AT kimdonghyun comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography AT kimjaeyeon comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography AT kimhyungjun comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography AT parkwonse comparisonofdetectionperformanceofsofttissuecalcificationsusingartificialintelligenceinpanoramicradiography |